My Policy Hub

Improving health is our policy

  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact

ACA Now

6102 - Accountability Requirements for Skilled Nursing Facilities and Nursing Facilities

 
Implementation Status 
Statutory Text 

Summary

Effective March 23, 2013, requires SNFs and NFs (under Medicare and Medicaid, respectively) to have in operation a compliance and ethics program to prevent and detect criminal, civil, and administrative violations and to promote quality of care.  Directs the Secretary of HHS to promulgate regulations by March 23, 2012 to this effect, which may include a model compliance program, and that takes into consideration the varying size of the organizations.  Also calls for an evaluation from the Secretary and a subsequent report to Congress delineating such findings by March 23, 2015. Directs the Secretary of HHS to establish a quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program by December 31, 2011 and requires compliance and coordination by the facilities relative to this effort not later than one year upon the date the regulations are promulgated to carry out the QAPI-related provisions.

Implementation Status

 
Summary 
Statutory Text 

Prior to January 2013, CMS in early 2011 issued a final Medicaid and CHIP provider screening rule that outlined a proposed approach and solicitation of comments for this provision as well as section 6401 of the ACA relative to ethics compliance programs.  This provision was also briefly addressed in an interim final rule also released in early 2011 that pertained mostly to section 6113 of the ACA relative to LTC facility closure notification requirements.

CMS reiterated in a subsequent 2011 rule addressing CMPs for NHs (pertaining to section 6111 of the ACA) that this provision would be addressed via separate rulemaking (that, as of December 2012, had yet to be promulgated).

On Feb. 20, CMS implemented changes to its 5-star ratings on the Nursing Home Compare website to incorporate quality metrics for short and long-stay antipsychotic patients; address staffing level computations; and raise the scoring standard for the quality measure performance dimension.

On July 16, CMS released a proposed rule that revises the requirements that long-term care facilities must meet to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The rule addressed this provision of the ACA. Comments are due Sept. 14.

2016

On July 28, CMS released July quarterly reports for Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) through the Nursing Home Compare reporting system, including information on the SNF Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. The agency also released a fact sheet on reporting requirements for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program (SNF QRP).

On Sept. 29, CMS issued a final rule delineating major reforms to Medicare and Medicaid conditions of participation (CoPs) impacting long-term care (LTC) facilities. In particular, the rule stipulates new prohibitions on the use of pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements as a condition of admission to the facility, among other reforms. The rule addresses these provisions of the ACA.

2019

On Aug. 28, House W&M Chairman Richard Neal issued letters to CMS Administrator Seema Verma and DOJ Associate Deputy Attorney General and National Elder Justice Coordinator Antoinette Bacon, requesting information on the oversight of potential cases of abuse and neglect in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).

On Sept. 16, OIG published a report that found that providers improperly billed for emergency ambulance transports from hospitals to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) on 99 percent of the total claim lines billed, yielding an estimated $849,170 in Medicare improper payments.

On Oct. 23, House E&C Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations convened a hearing to question Seema Verma, the Administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), on the Administration’s recent health care priorities. Administrator Verma testified about CMS’s efforts to lower costs and improve quality for beneficiaries through the patients over paperwork initiative and state flexibility to stabilize the individual market. Members questioned her about nursing home program integrity.

On Nov. 22, OIG released an updated interactive map displaying nursing home complaint trends between 2016 and 2018 by state, including the rate and time frame by which the state investigated reported complaints.

 

Statutory Text

 
Implementation Status 
Summary 

SEC. 6102. ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES AND NURSING FACILITIES. Part A of title XI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.), as amended by sections 6002 and 6004, is amended by inserting after section 1128H the following new section: ‘‘SEC. 1128I ø42 U.S.C. 1320a–7j¿. ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES. ‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF FACILITY.—In this section, the term ‘facility’ means— ‘‘(1) a skilled nursing facility (as defined in section 1819(a)); or ‘‘(2) a nursing facility (as defined in section 1919(a)). ‘‘(b) EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE AND ETHICS PROGRAMS.— ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—On or after the date that is 36 months after the date of the enactment of this section, a facility shall, with respect to the entity that operates the facility (in this subparagraph referred to as the ‘operating organization’ or ‘organization’), have in operation a compliance and ethics program that is effective in preventing and detecting criminal, civil, and administrative violations under this Act and in promoting quality of care consistent with regulations developed under paragraph (2). ‘‘(2) DEVELOPMENT OF REGULATIONS.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the date that is 2 years after such date of the enactment, the Secretary, working jointly with the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, shall promulgate regulations for an effective compliance and ethics program for operating organizations, which may include a model compliance program. ‘‘(B) DESIGN OF REGULATIONS.—Such regulations with respect to specific elements or formality of a program shall, in the case of an organization that operates 5 or more facilities, vary with the size of the organization, such that larger organizations should have a more formal program and include established written policies defining the standards and procedures to be followed by its employees. Such requirements may specifically apply to the corporate level management of multi unit nursing home chains. ‘‘(C) EVALUATION.—Not later than 3 years after the date of the promulgation of regulations under this paragraph, the Secretary shall complete an evaluation of the compliance and ethics programs required to be established under this subsection. Such evaluation shall determine if such programs led to changes in deficiency citations, changes in quality performance, or changes in other metrics of patient quality of care. The Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on such evaluation and shall include in such report such recommendations regarding changes in the requirements for such programs as the Secretary determines appropriate. ‘‘(3) REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE AND ETHICS PROGRAMS.—In this subsection, the term ‘compliance and ethics program’ means, with respect to a facility, a program of the operating organization that— ‘‘(A) has been reasonably designed, implemented, and enforced so that it generally will be effective in preventing and detecting criminal, civil, and administrative violations under this Act and in promoting quality of care; and ‘‘(B) includes at least the required components specified in paragraph (4). ‘‘(4) REQUIRED COMPONENTS OF PROGRAM.—The required components of a compliance and ethics program of an operating organization are the following: ‘‘(A) The organization must have established compliance standards and procedures to be followed by its employees and other agents that are reasonably capable of reducing the prospect of criminal, civil, and administrative violations under this Act. ‘‘(B) Specific individuals within high-level personnel of the organization must have been assigned overall responsibility to oversee compliance with such standards and procedures and have sufficient resources and authority to assure such compliance. ‘‘(C) The organization must have used due care not to delegate substantial discretionary authority to individuals whom the organization knew, or should have known through the exercise of due diligence, had a propensity to engage in criminal, civil, and administrative violations under this Act. ‘‘(D) The organization must have taken steps to communicate effectively its standards and procedures to all employees and other agents, such as by requiring participation in training programs or by disseminating publications that explain in a practical manner what is required. ‘‘(E) The organization must have taken reasonable steps to achieve compliance with its standards, such as by utilizing monitoring and auditing systems reasonably designed to detect criminal, civil, and administrative violations under this Act by its employees and other agents and by having in place and publicizing a reporting system whereby employees and other agents could report violations by others within the organization without fear of retribution. ‘‘(F) The standards must have been consistently enforced through appropriate disciplinary mechanisms, including, as appropriate, discipline of individuals responsible for the failure to detect an offense. ‘‘(G) After an offense has been detected, the organization must have taken all reasonable steps to respond appropriately to the offense and to prevent further similar offenses, including any necessary modification to its program to prevent and detect criminal, civil, and administrative violations under this Act. ‘‘(H) The organization must periodically undertake reassessment of its compliance program to identify changes necessary to reflect changes within the organization and its facilities. ‘‘(c) QUALITY ASSURANCE AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than December 31, 2011, the Secretary shall establish and implement a quality assurance and performance improvement program (in this subparagraph referred to as the ‘QAPI program’) for facilities, including multi unit chains of facilities. Under the QAPI program, the Secretary shall establish standards relating to quality assurance and performance improvement with respect to facilities and provide technical assistance to facilities on the development of best practices in order to meet such standards. Not later than 1 year after the date on which the regulations are promulgated under paragraph (2), a facility must submit to the Secretary a plan for the facility to meet such standards and implement such best practices, including how to coordinate the implementation of such plan with quality assessment and assurance activities conducted under sections 1819(b)(1)(B) and 1919(b)(1)(B), as applicable. ‘‘(2) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to carry out this subsection.’’.

Browse ACA Titles

  • I-Quality, Affordable Health Care for all Americans
  • II-Role of Public Programs
  • III-Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Health Care
  • IV-Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving Public Health
  • V-Health Care Workforce
  • VI-Transparency and Program Integrity
  • VII-Improving Access to Innovative Medical Therapies
  • VIII-Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS ACT)
  • IX-Revenue Provisions

ABOUT

  • Home
  • About Policy Hub
  • Free Newsletter
  • Team
  • Mission and Values
  • Contact Us

Contact Us

Impact Health Policy Partners 1301 K Street, NW, Suite 300W
Washington, D.C. 20005

(202) 309-0796
Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 ‐ Impact Health Policy Partners ‐ All Rights Reserved ‐ Privacy Policy ‐ Terms and Conditions ‐ Log in