My Policy Hub

Improving health is our policy

  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact

ACA Now

6301 - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

 
Implementation Status 
Statutory Text 

Summary

As revised by section 10602 of the Senate Manager’s Amendment. Establishes a private, nonprofit entity, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), overseen by a Comptroller General-appointed Board of Governors on which the Directors of the NIH and AHRQ are to reside.  The purpose of PCORI is to assist patients, clinicians, purchasers, and policymakers in making informed health decisions through the advancement of comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER).  CER is the term given to denote research evaluating and comparing health outcomes and the clinical effectiveness, risks, and benefits of two or more medical treatments, services, and items.

Sets forth the duties of PCORI, including identification of national research priorities and to establish and carry out a research agenda.

Directs the Secretary of HHS to make Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP data available to PCORI as appropriate and provided certain privacy safeguards remain intact.

Authorizes PCORI to appoint permanent or ad hoc expert advisory panels as to assist in identifying research priorities and establishing the research project agenda, including an expert panel for clinical trials and another for rare diseases.

Calls upon the Comptroller General to appoint a 15-member methodology committee, and specifies that the Directors of the NIH and AHRQ (or their designees) are to serve on the methodology committee in addition to the 15 appointments.  Requires the methodology committee to, not later than 18 months following PCORI’s establishment, develop and improve the science and methods of CER and produce reports to the Board of Governors in accordance with its responsibilities.

Specifies the manner in which PCORI’s research findings are to be made available to clinicians, patients, and the general public, clarifying that such findings do not constitute practice guidelines, coverage recommendations, payment or policy recommendations.  Further stipulates a host of limitations relative to PCORI’s research findings, that such findings may only be used to make a determination regarding Medicare coverage if such use is through an iterative and transparent process which includes public comment and considers the effect on subpopulations.

Delineates certain annual reporting requirements to the Congress and the President, as well as specifies other transparency-related provisions relative to public comment opportunities and so forth.  Tasks AHRQ, in consultation with NIH, with broadly disseminating PCORI’s research findings.

Establishes a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (“Trust Fund”) funded via transfers from Medicare in proportion to the total expenditures during certain FYs in addition to fees imposed on insured and self-insured health plans.  Also appropriates to the Trust Fund $10 million in FY 2010; $50 million in FY 2011; and $150 million for each of FYs 2012-2019.

Last updated: (October 31, 2016)  

Implementation Status

 
Summary 
Statutory Text 

Prior to January 2013, the GAO made initial (and ongoing) appointments to the PCORI Governing Board and Methodology Committee.  On May 21, 2012, the Board of Governors approved PCORI’s national priorities and research agenda.  A comprehensive listing of past and current funding opportunities is available here.

PCORI continues to move forward in its research endeavors as well as in building its core staffing infrastructure.  With respect to PCORI financing, in December 2012, the IRS issued a final rule to implement the fees imposed on self-insured plans to fund PCORI.

2013

On January 29, 2013, PCORI announced its solicitation of applications to serve on one of its four PCORI Advisory Panels.  Applications to serve on the panels were due March 4. See here for the PCORI Advisory Panels website.

On March 21, 2013, PCORI announced the appointment of Anne C. Beal, MD, MPH, as Chief Officer for Engagement (COE).  Details here.

On March 26, 2013, the PCORI Board of Governors approved 84 people with a broad range of expertise to serve on PCORI’s first four multi-stakeholder Advisory Panels. Details here.

On March 29, 2013, GAO issued a review of the audit of the PCORI financial statements for 2011 and 2012.

On April 23, 2013, PCORI announced two new funding opportunities totaling $68 million to conduct patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) via the development of a National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (NPCCRN).  A major component of this network are Clinical Data Research Networks (CDRNs), or system based networks (such as hospital systems) that have the potential to become an ideal electronic network, without structural impediments, and Patient Powered Research Networks (PPRNs), which are groups of patients interested in forming a research network and in participating in research.  The funding opportunity pertaining to support CDRN development is available here.  With respect to the latter opportunity (available here), PCORI aims to support the initiation and development of up to 18 new or existing PPRNs.  Required letters of intent (LOI) from applicants are due June 19 and complete applications are due September 27.

On April 24, 2013, PCORI announced the appointment of Bryan Luce, PhD, MBA, as PCORI’s first Chief Science Officer, overseeing the development and implementation of PCORI’s patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research agenda.  Details here. To view AHRQ-originating PCORI opportunities, see here.

On May 6, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Board of Governors approved nearly $89 million in funding to support the implementation of 51 new comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) projects.  Also, in a related event, on May 1, AHRQ announced a new funding opportunity entitled, “Closing the Gap in Healthcare Disparities through Dissemination and Implementation of Patient Centered Outcomes Research.”  Letters of intent are due June 14 and applications are due July 31.

In a related event, on May 9, AHRQ issued a new funding opportunity entitled, “Limited Competition:  Enhancing Investments in Comparative Effectiveness Research Resources (R01)” for which letters of intent are due June 7 and applications are due by 5pm ET on June 28.

On a related note, on June 25, AHRQ posted a funding opportunity entitled, “Disseminating Patient Centered Outcomes Research to Improve Healthcare Delivery.”  Letters of intent (LOIs) are due by August 26.  Full applications are due by September 27.

Also, on June 18, PCORI announced the availability of $17 million to fund patient-centered outcomes research projects related to uncontrolled asthma in African-American and Hispanic/Latino populations for which LOIs are due by August 1 and full applications due by September 18.

On June 17, PCORI announced the availability of $1.2M in funding under a “Pipeline to Proposal Awards Initiative” to train groups of patients and non-researchers to be able to partner with clinicians and researchers.  The awards are described in more detail on the PCORI blog.  PCORI is seeking five “intermediate funders” via a Request for Quotes; proposals are due on July 15, 2013.  On June 14, PCORI announced a Falls Injury Prevention partnership with the NIH.

On June 5, PCORI announced a funding opportunity to develop a Coordinating Center to provide technical assistance on specific projects pertaining to implementation of patient-centered CER.   Proposals are due July 31.

On July 16, 2013, the NIH’s National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) recently issued a request for applications (RFA) from researchers for proposal to facilitate a clinical trial to prevent serious injuries occurring from falls among seniors.  Letters of intent (LOIs) are due by October 13, followed by full applications no later than November 13.

Also, on July 29, 2013, PCORI hosted a webinar that included a roundtable discussion and public comment period designed to shape a forthcoming RFP related to developing a Blueprint for the dissemination of comparative-effectiveness research (CER).

In an August 21, 2013, blog post by PCORI executive director Dr. Joe Selby, PCORI indicated that it expects to commit over $400 million in 2013 to support CER.  On August 20, PCORI welcomed newly-appointed AHRQ director, Dr. Richard Kronick, to its board (see here), as well as made other key committee-level appointments (see here).

On August 30, 2013, PCORI released a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting a contractor to develop a Dissemination and Implementation Action Plan.  Questions regarding the solicitation were due by September 16, with the deadline for submissions set at October 25.  On September 10, PCORI announced its approval of $114 million to fund 71 awards to institutions in 20 states plus DC to conduct patient-centered outcomes research.  This latest, third round of patient-centered CER funding adds to the over $300 million in awards approved in 2012, and will be accounted for under the $400 million the Board intends to commit by year-end, PCORI said in a press release.   A Board meeting was also held on September 10.  Also, in mid-September, PCORI announced that it had awarded $243.5 million to support 147 studies geared-toward the organization’s five National Priorities for Research.  See here for more details, including ongoing and upcoming funding opportunities (and key deadlines).  On September 19, GAO announced the appointment of Chair Grayson Norquist, MD and the reappointment of Vice Chair Steven Lipstein, MHA to the PCORI Board of Governors. See here for the PCORI press release.   A Board meeting was held on September 23.  Note also that AHRQ has posted a number of various Patient-Centered Outcomes Research-focused funding opportunities (which do not appear to be funded by the ACA) available here.

On September 30, AHRQ in conjunction with PCORI issued a new funding opportunity for which LOIs are due by November 15 and applications by December 16 entitled, “Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) for Treatment Options in Uterine Fibroids: Developing a Prospective Multi-Center Practice-based Clinical Registry (P50)” (RFA-HS-14-006).

On October 15, PCORI announced the limited availability of “Tier 1” Pipeline to Proposal awards through which PCORI intends to provide “seed money” to support partnership-driven research projects.  Proposals are due December 2.  More information is available here and a webinar is planned for November 13.

During the month of October, PCORI also named Dr. Harold Sox of Dartmouth College’s Geisel School of Medicine as Senior Advisor to PCORI.  On October 22, the GAO issued a notice announcing that it is soliciting applications to fill an opening on the 19-member ACA-established PCORI Board of Governors.  Letters of nomination and resumes are due to the GAO by November 15.  Note also that a PCORI Merit Review Process webinar is planned on October 30.  Details here.

As per a October 28 newsletter, PCORI has made some changes to its three existing funding application cycles to four cycles with new deadlines.  See the PCORI Funding Center for details.

In late October, 2013, PCORI announced new funding cycle dates and names; details here.   On Nov. 20, PCORI announced several developments, including those related to the recent approval of a strategic plan, a Fiscal Year 2014 budget, and a resolution to commit up to $1.03 billion in research funding over the next two fiscal years. PCORI also issued its revised PCORI Methodology Report and approved charters for an advisory panel on rare disease and another on clinical trials. Also, on Dec. 3, the PCORI Board of Governors will convene via public teleconference and webinar to discuss potential approval of research funding announcements related to obesity and care transition. Registration here.

On  December 17, 2013, PCORI approved $191 million in CER projects across the country. Of that amount, $97.3 million was approved to support 53 CER studies (the details of which are here and an interactive awardee map here) and another $93.5 was approved to support 29 clinical research data networks, which together, will form a new National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, or PCORnet, to conduct CER (see here for the latter details). On December 23, PCORI announced $432,100 in seed grants under a pilot initiative that aims to foster partnerships between researchers, patients and others that could culminate in comparative effectiveness studies. Also, PCORI convened a series of meetings in December and January on various topics regarding patient-centered research, the details of which are posted here. For example, on January 14, 2014, the PCORI Board of Governors voted to approve $5 million to fund research that advances Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) within the patient centered framework of PCORI’s mission. The grants will consist of a maximum $500,000 for two years. See here and here for further details. On January 27, 2014, PCORI updated the pre-announcement regarding planned pragmatic clinical studies and large simple trials initiative for which applicants may begin submitting LOIs as early as February 5, 2014. Also, please note upcoming PCORI CER-focused webinars; details here.

2014

On February 4, 2014, GAO announced appointments to PCORI’s Board of Governors. On February 5, PCORI announced the availability of $206 million to support CER projects via the release of 8 respective funding opportunity announcements (FOAs), namely: (1) Pragmatic Clinical Studies and Large Simple Trials – LOIs are due by March 7; applications (if invited to apply) are due by August 8. Details are available here; (2) Effectiveness of Transitional Care – LOIs are due by March 7; applications (if invited to apply) are due by May 6. Details are available here; (3) Obesity Treatment Options Set in Primary Care for Underserved Populations – LOIs are due by March 7; applications (if invited to apply) are due by May 6. Details are available here; (4-8) Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options ($32 million) – details here; Improving Healthcare Systems ($16 million) – details here; Communication and Dissemination Research ($8 million) – details here; Addressing Disparities ($8 million) – details here; and Improving Methods for Conducting Patient-Centered Outcomes Research ($17 million) – details here. With respect to #4-8 FOAs, LOIs are due by March 7; applications are due by May 6. his website contains more details regarding informational applicant Town Hall calls and webinars that pertain to the respective FOAs. On February 13, PCORI hosted webinar regarding the Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards program. On February 25, PCORI’s Board of Governors approved and reapproved a number of new and current appointees to its advisory panels. Details here.

On March 14, 2014, AHRQ released two FOAs to support patient-centered outcomes research in primary care practices – see here and here. A technical assistance conference call is planned for April 24, 2014. LOIs are due by May 23, 2014, followed by applications by July 3, 2014. Additional details are available here. In mid-March, PCORI named Jean Slutsky as PCORI’s Chief Engagement and Dissemination Officer. This same month, GAO issued a solicitation for nominees to apply to fill four positions on PCORI’s Methodology Committee, which seeks to develop and improve the science and methods of CER; nominations are due by April 11, 2014. On March 25, the PCORI Board of Governors approved members to its newly-established Advisory Panel on Rare Disease and Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials (see here and here, respectively, for those details).

On March 1, 2014, AHRQ issued a solicitation entitled, “AHRQ Mentored Career Enhancement Award in Patient Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) for Mid-Career and Senior Investigators (K18)” for which applications are due December 18, 2014.

On March 27, the GAO issued a review of the audit of PCORI’s financial statements for 2013 and 2012.

In April 2014, PCORI announced newly-appointed members to various panels; details here. The PCORI Board of Governors meets on May 5 in Washington, DC; details here.

On April 24, AHRQ convened a technical assistance conference call to discuss a recent FOA titled, “Accelerating the Dissemination and Implementation of PCOR Findings Into Primary Care Practice (R18)” for which LOIs were due on May 23; applications are due by July 3. A copy of the call transcript is available here.

In late April, AHRQ released a FOA titled, “Disseminating and Implementing Evidence from Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in Clinical Practice Using Mobile Health Technology (R21).” LOIs are due by June 20; applications are due by August 4.

On May 5, PCORI issued a notice soliciting contractors to serve as the operational and fiscal agents in servicing the Pipeline to Proposal Awards. The deadline for quotes was May 21.

On May 12, PCORI announced the proposals selected to submit full applications under the first round of the Pragmatic Studies Initiative. On May 19, PCORI issued a list funding opportunities that will begin to receive applications on August 6. The programs vary from quality initiatives to communication and systems improvement. PCORI also issued a second solicitation under its ongoing Pragmatic Studies Initiative in which it seeks letters of intent by June 27 (and full applications from invited participants by July 31) for projects proposing to address 4 new topic areas that expand upon the previously defined 15 high-priority, high-burden topics.

On May 20, PCORI and the John A. Hartford Foundation announced their joint partnership in the CaRe-Align initiative, “an initiative to develop a new model of care that could better meet the complex needs of older patients with multiple chronic conditions.”

On May 29, PCORI announced its support of the NAMD-led Medicaid Medical Directors Network.

On June 4, the NIH and PCORI announced a $30 million 5-year national study on preventing fall-related injuries.

PCORI’s June 19 newsletter announces a number of updates on the CER front, including PCORI’s recent approval of leadership chairs for newly-installed advisory panels (on clinical trials and rare diseases), as well as reiterates imminent funding proposal deadlines, among other announcements.

On a related CER note, on July 30, AHRQ posted a final report pertaining to Recovery Act funding of “Comparative Effectiveness of Health Care Delivery Systems for American Indians and Alaska Natives Using Enhanced Data Infrastructure.”

On July 1, PCORI announced that two newly-installed advisory panels on rare diseases and clinical trials have set their initial priorities.

On July 22, PCORI announced via a blog post on the Engagement Awards issued to-date, in addition to announcing a new funding opportunity that will provide PCOR/CER meeting and conference support. Additional details on the latter funding opportunity are also available here.

In mid-July, AHRQ circulated additional details on its $10.5M grant opportunity for up to three Centers of Excellence that will examine comparative health systems with an eye toward accelerating patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) dissemination (see the grant postingand details, along with the latest agency e-alert below). Eligible entities include public or non-profit private institutions, including community-based organizations, for-profit private institutions and local and state governments, among others. Applications are due by Oct. 17, 2014, with letters of intent due by Sept. 5.

On July 23, PCORI convened a webinar to discuss PCORI’s Methodology Report and standards. An archived webinar is available here.

On July 29, PCORI’s Board of Governors convened to discuss approval of the organization’s next installment of funding awards. An archived webinar is available here. Note that PCORI’s funding application system – for its upcoming fall 2014 funding cycle – will open on August 6; details here and here.

On July 29, PCORI’s Board of Governors approved the award of $54.8 million to support 33 CER studies. A fact sheet is available here.

On August 1, AHRQ sent a proposed information collection to OMB for approval titled, “Continuing Education for Comparative Effectiveness Research Survey.” AHRQ stated in the notice that it is interested in “providing health care decision-makers (e.g., patients, healthcare providers, purchasers, and policymakers) with recent evidence-based information about the harms, benefits, and effectiveness of various treatment options by comparing medical devices, surgeries, tests, drugs, or ways to deliver health care.”

In early august, NASHP, via an engagement grant from PCORI, developed a CER tool for state health policymakers titled, “A Roadmap For State Policymakers To Use Comparative Effectiveness And Patient-Centered Outcomes Research To Inform Decision Making” (details).

On August 6, PCORI announced a series of funding opportunities for patient-centered comparative CER totaling $76 million. Each of thefunding opportunities are outlined here and are intended to support projects under PCORI’s five broad National Priorities for Research. Furthermore, in conjunction with the latest funding announcements, PCORI announced refinements to its application process and issued additional guidance on its priority areas. For this funding round, LOIs are due September 5, 2014.

On August 11, AHRQ conveyed its “continued interest” in supporting individual clinicians through 3-5 year grants, with a focus on readiness for careers that include applying comparative effectiveness approaches to clinical and health system challenges. Existing funding opportunities include the previously announced Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Mentored Clinical Investigator Award (K08; here) and PCOR Mentored Research Scientist Development Award (K01; here).

On August 18, PCORI announced (blog post) the availability of $90 million under its third funding announcement of the Pragmatic Clinical Studies initiative to supportstudies comparing two or more alternatives for addressing a condition, improving systems-level approaches to managing care or eliminating disparities. This “Winter 2015 Cycle” funding may total up to $10 million in direct costs for funded studies of up to five years. LOIs are due by 5pm EST on October 1, 2014, with those invited to submit full applications slated to be notified by October 31, 2014. Full applications then will be due by February 3, 2015, with funding awards announced in July/August 2015. An applicant town hall webinar was held on August 21 to discuss the opportunity (archive available here).

An archive of the August 26 PCORI Board of Governors meeting will soon be available here.

PCORI will convene a public workshop in San Diego, CA on September 22-23 titled, “Getting to Know PCORI: From Application to Closeout,” to help applicants better understand and develop PCORI project proposals (details).

A September 11th webinar is planned titled, “PCORI in Practice: Highlighting Opportunities for Medical Specialty Societies.” Details here.

On Sept. 9, NASHP announced a new listserv for policy makers supported by PCORI to facilitate learning and sharing among state policy makers interested in the most up to date evidence based policy.

On Sept. 15, PCORI announced its solicitation of public input on a “Proposal for Peer Review of Primary Research and Public Release of Primary Research Findings” (see here). The deadline is Nov. 7, 2014.

On Sept.15, the PCORI Board of Governors approved the organization’s FY 15 budget; details here.

On Sept.18, the GAO announced the appointment of three new members to the PCORI Methodology Committee.

On Sept. 23, PCORI distributed $150,000 in prices to the developers of the top three “Matchmaking Apps” for linking and spurring collaborations between patients, caregivers, clinicians and other health research stakeholders.

On Sept. 23, the IOM released a summary of two workshops focused on Value & Science-Driven Health Care that were sponsored by PCORI.

On Sept. 26, PCORI announced that its Chief Science Officer, Dr. Bryan Luce, intends to retire “within the next six to 12 months.”

In general, for a list of current PCORI funding opportunities, including an announcement regarding a change in timeline for Engagement Awards (details), please see here.

On Sept. 30, the PCORI Board of Governors approved $102 million to support 46 new proposals focused on CER. Also on Sept. 30, PCORI announced a research team focused on treatments for uterine fibroids (details) as well as the appointment of a new member to its Board of Governors (details).

On October 2, PCORI announced it is seeking comments on its draft plan for how it will meet its obligation to peer-review and publicly disclose research results. Comments are due Nov. 7.

On October 7, PCORI launched Evidence-to-Action Networks to promote broader information sharing.

On October 16, AHRQ issued a notice announcing that a proposed information collection titled, “Continuing Education for Comparative Effectiveness Research Survey,” was transmitted to OMB for its review and approval. An additional 30-day comment window – through Nov. 17, 2014 – has been provided.

On October 20, the GAO issued a notice soliciting nominees to fill one vacancy on PCORI’s Methodology Committee to develop and improve the science and methods of CER. Specifically, the GAO seeks to appoint an individual with “expertise in health informatics, especially expertise in developing data networks or decision support for clinicians and patients…” Nominations are due by Nov. 17, 2014.

In mid-October, PCORI announced an upcoming workshop to be held jointly with Mathematica Policy Research on Dec. 10 discuss its draft CER framework and toolkit;details.

On October 29, PCORI announced its plans to implement its first PCORnet clinical trial, which will examine “the optimal dose of daily aspirin needed to lower the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients previously diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD).”

On Nov. 4, AHRQ announced its plans to – in the winter 2014-2015 – issue a grant opportunity through which the agency will establish a center dedicated to the dissemination of patient-centered outcomes research through clinical decision support. An application deadline is anticipated in spring 2015.

A Nov. 5 PCORI blog post highlighted PCORI-funded partnerships in support of caregiver initiatives.

On Nov. 18, the PCORI Board of Governors convened (agenda/details).

On Nov. 24, PCORI announced the availability of up to $4 million in FY 15 to expand the “Pipeline to Proposal” initiative, which is working to develop a nationwide community of patients, researchers and stakeholders participating in patient-centered outcomes research. An informational webinar was held on Dec. 3; details here. LOIs are due Dec. 23, 2014 with full applications due Mon., Feb. 16, 2015. Additional application details are specified here.

In late Nov., AHRQ published a compilation of AHRQ projects funded by the PCORI Trust Fund here.

A Dec. 10 PCORI webinar is planned to highlight evidence-based strategies for effective research dissemination and implementation (D&I); details and registration here.

On Dec 5, the PCORI Board of Governors announced it will consider whether to approve funding for comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) on hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection at its Dec. 8 meeting.

On Dec. 8, the PCORI Board of Governors announced $50 million in funding for up to four CER studies on the best ways to diagnose and treat HCV infection.

On Dec. 15, PCORI announced a Request for Proposals to develop an academic curriculum for PCORI’s methodology standards to be implemented in an academic setting. The deadline for proposals was Jan. 30, 2015.

On Dec. 19, PCORI announced that it is accepting nominations for a host of (see announcement) Advisory Panels for terms beginning in 2015.  Applications are due Feb. 6, 2015.

On Dec. 22, PCORI announced the availability of up to $150.7 million in FY 15 funding to support further development of health systems-based and patient-powered data networks. LOIs were due Jan. 15, 2015 with full applications due Feb. 3, 2015. Additional application details are specified here.

2015

On Jan. 27, 2015 the PCORI Board of Governors announced the availability of $9 million in funding for two obesity-related demonstration studies, as well as announcing the charter for a new Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research (CDR). See here for more information on the panel and the application process.

A Feb. 2 blog post emphasizes PCORI’s commitment to reducing and treating heart and related vascular disease.

On Feb. 4, PCORI issued a $50 million funding announcement pertaining to the clinical management of Hepatitis C infection. LOIs are due Mar. 6, 2015 followed by applications by May 5, 2015.

On Feb. 5, PCORI published information on how it expects applicants for PCORI research funding to address human subject protections.

On Feb. 9, PCORI announced key dates for its Obesity Observational Research Initiative. The online application system is slated to open Feb. 25, 2015 with an application deadline of Apr. 30, 2015.

On Feb. 24, PCORI’s Board of Governors awarded more than $64 million for five patient-centered CER studies on care for cancer, back pain, and stroke.

On Mar. 9, GAO released a report that provides background on the PCORI and its “established priorities and processes for funding comparative effectiveness research.” Also addressed are current contract awards and plans for future awards.

On Mar. 30, PCORI approved 27 projects that were awarded Tier I support through its Pipeline to Proposal Awards program. Each project will receive an additional infusion of funding to continue work that began in 2013.

On Apr. 6, PCORI issued a funding announcement under its Pragmatic Clinical Studies initiative, offering up to $90 million in support for projects evaluating the effectiveness of different care options in “real-world” settings. See here.

On Apr. 15, PCORI “announced plans to offer free continuing medical education (CME) and continuing education (CE) opportunities focused on patient-centered outcomes research.” See here.

On Apr. 21, PCORI’s Board of Governors approved (announcement here) more than “$120 million to fund 34 patient-centered clinical comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) studies on a range of conditions and patient populations.”

On Apr. 22, PCORI’s Board of Governors approved 21 people to serve as the first members of PCORI’s new Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research (CDR)

On May 4, PCORI announced a three-year, $14 million clinical trial designed to determine the best dose of aspirin to use to prevent heart attacks and strokes in people with heart disease.

On May 5, the PCORI board “approved $14 million for the first demonstration project to be conducted using PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, as well as plans for two more PCORnet demonstration projects totaling up to $29.5 million in support.”

On June 9, PCORI announced a milestone of having funded more than $180 million in comparative effectiveness research focused on improving child health and care delivery.

On June 16, the PCORI Board of Governors approved the development of a funding announcement designed to engage health insurance plans with PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. The funding opportunity will provide up to $6 million to support collaborations between one or two health plans and PCORnet networks.

On July 9, NIH published a notice of intent to launch a new initiative to disseminate and to implement patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) findings through clinical decision support (CDS).

On July 21, the PCORI Board of Governors approved nearly $142.5 million to support the ongoing development and expansion of known as PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network.

2016

On Feb. 8, in a blog post, NIH Director of Science Policy highlighted the collaborative work between the NIH Office of Science Policy and PCORI.

On Feb. 25, at a Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) White House Summit, the PCORI executive director announced an initiative to enable individuals to access data in their electronic health records (EHRs) and share it for research.

On Apr. 26 the PCORI Board of Governors approved $44.4 million in funding for 21 new patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) studies.

On Apr. 26, announced a new policy that will facilitate free public access to the published findings of PCORI-funded comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) studies.

On May 10, PCORI announced that it has awarded funds totaling nearly $1.1 million to enable 44 projects that were awarded Tier I support through its Pipeline to Proposal Awards programto move forward into the program’s second phase.

On May 23, PCORI’s Board of Governors approved more than $20 million to fund four new patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) studies, including research on breast screening, cerebral palsy, hepatitis C, and stress management.

On May 23, PCORI announced that Dr. Andrew Bindman, the newly named Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), will serve PCORI’s Board of Governors.

On June 16, GAO announced a request for nominations for the Board of Governors of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Letters of nomination and resumes are due by July 21, 2016. Nominations can be submitted by e-mail to PCORl@gao.gov or to the mailing address noted in the announcement (here).

On June 21, PCORI approved nearly $9 million for two projects designed to show how health plans can partner with PCORnet’s Clinical Data Research Networks (CDRNs) to capture health plan data, especially from claims and membership records, to support the goal of speeding research that can help make better-informed healthcare decisions.

On June 29, PCORI announced its support of Vice President Joe Biden’s Cancer Moonshot program to increase the pace and power of clinical research and care through a series of commitments by PCORnet, and patient partnerships to accelerate the pace and power of clinical research.

On July 12, PCORI awarded funds totaling nearly $1.2 million to enable 22 projects to advance into the final phase of PCORI’s Pipeline to Proposal Awards program.

On July 19, PCORI’s Board of Governors approved $152.8 million to fund 28 comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) studies and seven related projects for improving CER methods.

On Aug. 5, PCORI awarded funds totaling $688,000 for 46 projects through its “Pipeline to Proposal” Awards program.

On Aug. 16, PCORI’s Board of Governors approved the selection or reappointment of 48 people to serve on PCORI’s seven multi-stakeholder advisory panels.

On Aug. 16, PCORI announced that it would begin accepting letters of intent regarding ten PCORI Funding Announcements (PFAs). LOIs for all PFAs are due September 14.

On Aug. 17, PCORI issued 10 new announcements offering up to $351 million in funding for patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) study proposals.

On Sept. 6, PCORI joined with the American Heart Association (AHA) to announce a “crowdsourcing challenge” for clinicians and researchers across the country to find the best ideas for new research questions that deal with problematic challenges identified by patients with cardiovascular diseases.

On Sept. 22, the GAO announced the appointment of two new members to the Governing Board of PCORI:  Russell Howerton, MD, Chief Medical Officer and Vice President of Clinical Operations at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center and Kathleen Troeger, MPH, Director of Outcomes Research at Hologic, Inc. in Massachusetts.  In addition, Grayson Norquist, MD, was named to a second three-year term as chair.

On Sept. 27, the PCORI Board of Governors approved $14.8 million to fund a study of two newer blood-thinning medications. The study will compare the two drugs against each other and against an older drug to see which works best in preventing the recurrence of blood clots in the veins and lungs.

On Oct. 3, PCORI published information regarding posttreatment surveillance for breast cancer survivors and held a Twitter chat on Oct. 25 about the challenges patients and clinicians face in making decisions for breast cancer care and research. PCORI noted that it has funded 17 patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness studies related to breast cancer, totaling approximately $77 million.

In October, PCORI announced milestones including an end of fiscal year portfolio of almost $1.6 billion for 551 CER and related projects. PCORI also described great progress in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), which brings together large-scale health data for stakeholder partners. In the past year, PCORI also began implementing a process for peer-reviewing its primary research and releasing useful summaries of results. The first summary should appear on its website in early 2017.

On Oct. 31, the PCORI Board of Governors announced the availability of up to $50 million for studies comparing non-surgical interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain.  PCORI notes that chronic low back pain accounts for the majority of the $100 billion in medical costs associated with low back pain.

On Nov. 1, PCORI released a draft “Policy for Data Access and Data Sharing,” which sets forth expectations and guidelines for PCORI-funded researchers.  The draft policy includes funding for all large PCORI studies to document their data and place them into a repository.  The draft policy was developed by PCORI staff along with input from an expert advisory panel comprised of members of PCORI’s Board of Governors.  PCORI invites stakeholders to review and comment on the draft by Dec. 15.

In November, PCORI announced the “Evidence Synthesis Initiative,” which looks at results and data from already-completed research studies.  The goal of the initiative is to bring together and review all pertinent finalized studies regarding a clinical question in order to “provide evidence that is stronger and more certain the results of each individual study.”  PCORI also will fund projects that reanalyze data from already completed studies to see which groups of patients gain the most or least benefit or are at greater risk for harms.

2017 

On May 8, PCORI announced an updated version of the PCORI Methodology Standards.  The revised standards total 48 and cover 12 topic areas.

On May 8, PCORI announced two new PCORI Funding Announcements (PFAs) that will total up to $41 million for comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) on opioids and advanced illnesses.

On Aug. 1, PCORI awarded more than $3 million for 83 new projects through its Pipeline to Proposal Awards program.

On Aug. 15, PCORI’s Board of Governors approved the selection of 26 new and seven reappointed advisory panel members.

On Aug. 15, PCORI approved $115 million to fund 20 new patient-centered CER studies, including almost $74 million to fund seven studies for research on palliative care and close to $10 million to fund two new studies on reducing unsafe opioid prescribing.

On Sep. 12, PCORI approved $97.9 million to fund 11 studies to support patient-centered CER research, including $18 million to fund two studies comparing ways to improve care-management for adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease and $38 million to fund five studies comparing strategies for treating multiple sclerosis.

On Sep. 26, PCORI approved $8.6 million to fund a new study comparing treatment options for people with psoriasis and $2.75 million to support a funding opportunity in partnership with the American Heart Association to improve the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Statutory Text

 
Implementation Status 
Summary 

SEC. 6301. PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH. (a) IN GENERAL.—Title XI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new part: ‘‘PART D—COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH ‘‘COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH ‘‘SEC. 1181 ø42 U.S.C. 1320e¿. (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: ‘‘(1) BOARD.—The term ‘Board’ means the Board of Governors established under subsection (f). ‘‘(2) COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; RESEARCH.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The terms ‘comparative clinical effectiveness research’ and ‘research’ mean research evaluating and comparing health outcomes and the clinical effectiveness, risks, and benefits of 2 or more medical treatments, services, and items described in subparagraph (B). ‘‘(B) MEDICAL TREATMENTS, SERVICES, AND ITEMS DESCRIBED.—The medical treatments, services, and items described in this subparagraph are health care interventions, protocols for treatment, care management, and delivery, procedures, medical devices, diagnostic tools, pharmaceuticals (including drugs and biologicals), integrative health practices, and any other strategies or items being used in the treatment, management, and diagnosis of, or prevention of illness or injury in, individuals. ‘‘(3) CONFLICT OF INTEREST.—The term ‘conflict of interest’ means an association, including a financial or personal association, that have the potential to bias or have the appearance of biasing an individual’s decisions in matters related to the Institute or the conduct of activities under this section. ‘‘(4) REAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST.—The term ‘real conflict of interest’ means any instance where a member of the Board, the methodology committee established under subsection (d)(6), or an advisory panel appointed under subsection (d)(4), or a close relative of such member, has received or could receive either of the following: ‘‘(A) A direct financial benefit of any amount deriving from the result or findings of a study conducted under this section. ‘‘(B) A financial benefit from individuals or companies that own or manufacture medical treatments, services, or items to be studied under this section that in the aggregate exceeds $10,000 per year. For purposes of the preceding sentence, a financial benefit includes honoraria, fees, stock, or other financial benefit and the current value of the member or close relative’s already existing stock holdings, in addition to any direct financial benefit deriving from the results or findings of a study conducted under this section. ‘‘(b) PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE.— ‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is authorized to be established a nonprofit corporation, to be known as the ‘PatientCentered Outcomes Research Institute’ (referred to in this section as the ‘Institute’) which is neither an agency nor establishment of the United States Government. ‘‘(2) APPLICATION OF PROVISIONS.—The Institute shall be subject to the provisions of this section, and, to the extent consistent with this section, to the District of Columbia Nonprofit Corporation Act. ‘‘(3) FUNDING OF COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.—For fiscal year 2010 and each subsequent fiscal year, amounts in the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (referred to in this section as the ‘PCORTF’) under section 9511 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be available, without further appropriation, to the Institute to carry out this section. ‘‘(c) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Institute is to assist patients, clinicians, purchasers, and policy-makers in making informed health decisions by advancing the quality and relevance of evidence concerning the manner in which diseases, disorders, and other health conditions can effectively and appropriately be prevented, diagnosed, treated, monitored, and managed through research and evidence synthesis that considers variations in patient subpopulations, and the dissemination of research findings with respect to the relative health outcomes, clinical effectiveness, and appropriateness of the medical treatments, services, and items described in subsection (a)(2)(B). ‘‘(d) DUTIES.— ‘‘(1) IDENTIFYING RESEARCH PRIORITIES AND ESTABLISHING RESEARCH PROJECT AGENDA.— ‘‘(A) IDENTIFYING RESEARCH PRIORITIES.—The Institute shall identify national priorities for research, taking into account factors of disease incidence, prevalence, and burden in the United States (with emphasis on chronic conditions), gaps in evidence in terms of clinical outcomes, practice variations and health disparities in terms of delivery and outcomes of care, the potential for new evidence to improve patient health, well-being, and the quality of care, the effect on national expenditures associated with a health care treatment, strategy, or health conditions, as well as patient needs, outcomes, and preferences, the relevance to patients and clinicians in making informed health decisions, and priorities in the National Strategy for quality care established under section 399H of the Public Health Service Act that are consistent with this section. ‘‘(B) ESTABLISHING RESEARCH PROJECT AGENDA.—The Institute shall establish and update a research project agenda for research to address the priorities identified under subparagraph (A), taking into consideration the types of research that might address each priority and the relative value (determined based on the cost of conducting research compared to the potential usefulness of the information produced by research) associated with the different types of research, and such other factors as the Institute determines appropriate. ‘‘(2) CARRYING OUT RESEARCH PROJECT AGENDA.— ‘‘(A) RESEARCH.—The Institute shall carry out the research project agenda established under paragraph (1)(B) in accordance with the methodological standards adopted under paragraph (9) using methods, including the following: ‘‘(i) Systematic reviews and assessments of existing and future research and evidence including original research conducted subsequent to the date of the enactment of this section. ‘‘(ii) Primary research, such as randomized clinical trials, molecularly informed trials, and observational studies. ‘‘(iii) Any other methodologies recommended by the methodology committee established under paragraph (6) that are adopted by the Board under paragraph (9). ‘‘(B) CONTRACTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF FUNDING AND CONDUCT OF RESEARCH.— ‘‘(i) CONTRACTS.— ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the research project agenda established under paragraph (1)(B), the Institute shall enter into contracts for the management of funding and conduct of research in accordance with the following: ‘‘(aa) Appropriate agencies and instrumentalities of the Federal Government. ‘‘(bb) Appropriate academic research, private sector research, or study-conducting entities. ‘‘(II) PREFERENCE.—In entering into contracts under subclause (I), the Institute shall give preference to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institutes of Health, but only if the research to be conducted or managed under such contract is authorized by the governing statutes of such Agency or Institutes. ‘‘(ii) CONDITIONS FOR CONTRACTS.—A contract entered into under this subparagraph shall require that the agency, instrumentality, or other entity— ‘‘(I) abide by the transparency and conflicts of interest requirements under subsection (h) that apply to the Institute with respect to the research managed or conducted under such contract; ‘‘(II) comply with the methodological standards adopted under paragraph (9) with respect to such research; ‘‘(III) consult with the expert advisory panels for clinical trials and rare disease appointed under clauses (ii) and (iii), respectively, of paragraph (4)(A); ‘‘(IV) subject to clause (iv), permit a researcher who conducts original research, as described in subparagraph (A)(ii), under the contract for the agency, instrumentality, or other entity to have such research published in a peer-reviewed journal or other publication, as long as the researcher enters into a data use agreement with the Institute for use of the data from the original research, as appropriate; øAs revised by section 10602(1)(A)(i) and (ii)¿ ‘‘(V) have appropriate processes in place to manage data privacy and meet ethical standards for the research; ‘‘(VI) comply with the requirements of the Institute for making the information available to the public under paragraph (8); and ‘‘(VII) comply with other terms and conditions determined necessary by the Institute to carry out the research agenda adopted under paragraph (2). ‘‘(iii) COVERAGE OF COPAYMENTS OR COINSURANCE.—A contract entered into under this subparagraph may allow for the coverage of copayments or coinsurance, or allow for other appropriate measures, to the extent that such coverage or other measures are necessary to preserve the validity of a research project, such as in the case where the research project must be blinded. ‘‘(iv) SUBSEQUENT USE OF THE DATA.—The Institute shall not allow the subsequent use of data from original research in work-for-hire contracts with individuals, entities, or instrumentalities that have a financial interest in the results, unless approved under a data use agreement with the Institute. øReplaced by section 10602(1)(B)¿ ‘‘(C) REVIEW AND UPDATE OF EVIDENCE.—The Institute shall review and update evidence on a periodic basis as appropriate. ‘‘(D) TAKING INTO ACCOUNT POTENTIAL DIFFERENCES.— Research shall be designed, as appropriate, to take into account the potential for differences in the effectiveness of health care treatments, services, and items as used with various subpopulations, such as racial and ethnic minorities, women, age, and groups of individuals with different comorbidities, genetic and molecular sub-types, or quality of life preferences and include members of such subpopulations as subjects in the research as feasible and appropriate. ‘‘(E) DIFFERENCES IN TREATMENT MODALITIES.—Research shall be designed, as appropriate, to take into account different characteristics of treatment modalities that may affect research outcomes, such as the phase of the treatment modality in the innovation cycle and the impact of the skill of the operator of the treatment modality. ‘‘(3) DATA COLLECTION.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall, with appropriate safeguards for privacy, make available to the Institute such data collected by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services under the programs under titles XVIII, XIX, and XXI, as well as provide access to the data networks developed under section 937(f) of the Public Health Service Act, as the Institute and its contractors may require to carry out this section. The Institute may also request and obtain data from Federal, State, or private entities, including data from clinical databases and registries. ‘‘(B) USE OF DATA.—The Institute shall only use data provided to the Institute under subparagraph (A) in accordance with laws and regulations governing the release and use of such data, including applicable confidentiality and privacy standards. ‘‘(4) APPOINTING EXPERT ADVISORY PANELS.— ‘‘(A) APPOINTMENT.— ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The Institute may appoint permanent or ad hoc expert advisory panels as determined appropriate to assist in identifying research priorities and establishing the research project agenda under paragraph (1) and for other purposes. ‘‘(ii) EXPERT ADVISORY PANELS FOR CLINICAL TRIALS.—The Institute shall appoint expert advisory panels in carrying out randomized clinical trials under the research project agenda under paragraph (2)(A)(ii). Such expert advisory panels shall advise the Institute and the agency, instrumentality, or entity conducting the research on the research question involved and the research design or protocol, including important patient subgroups and other parameters of the research. Such panels shall be available as a resource for technical questions that may arise during the conduct of such research. ‘‘(iii) EXPERT ADVISORY PANEL FOR RARE DISEASE.— In the case of a research study for rare disease, the Institute shall appoint an expert advisory panel for purposes of assisting in the design of the research study and determining the relative value and feasibility of conducting the research study. ‘‘(B) COMPOSITION.—An expert advisory panel appointed under subparagraph (A) shall include representatives of practicing and research clinicians, patients, and experts in scientific and health services research, health services delivery, and evidence-based medicine who have experience in the relevant topic, and as appropriate, experts in integrative health and primary prevention strategies. The Institute may include a technical expert of each manufacturer or each medical technology that is included under the relevant topic, project, or category for which the panel is established. ‘‘(5) SUPPORTING PATIENT AND CONSUMER REPRESENTA- TIVES.—The Institute shall provide support and resources to help patient and consumer representatives effectively participate on the Board and expert advisory panels appointed by the Institute under paragraph (4). ‘‘(6) ESTABLISHING METHODOLOGY COMMITTEE.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Institute shall establish a standing methodology committee to carry out the functions described in subparagraph (C). ‘‘(B) APPOINTMENT AND COMPOSITION.—The methodology committee established under subparagraph (A) shall be composed of not more than 15 members appointed by the Comptroller General of the United States. Members appointed to the methodology committee shall be experts in their scientific field, such as health services research, clinical research, comparative clinical effectiveness research, biostatistics, genomics, and research methodologies. Stakeholders with such expertise may be appointed to the methodology committee. In addition to the members appointed under the first sentence, the Directors of the National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (or their designees) shall each be included as members of the methodology committee. ‘‘(C) FUNCTIONS.—Subject to subparagraph (D), the methodology committee shall work to develop and improve the science and methods of comparative clinical effectiveness research by, not later than 18 months after the establishment of the Institute, directly or through subcontract, developing and periodically updating the following: ‘‘(i) Methodological standards for research. Such methodological standards shall provide specific criteria for internal validity, generalizability, feasibility, and timeliness of research and for health outcomes measures, risk adjustment, and other relevant aspects of research and assessment with respect to the design of research. Any methodological standards developed and updated under this subclause shall be scientifically based and include methods by which new information, data, or advances in technology are considered and incorporated into ongoing research projects by the Institute, as appropriate. The process for developing and updating such standards shall include input from relevant experts, stakeholders, and decisionmakers, and shall provide opportunities for public comment. Such standards shall also include methods by which patient subpopulations can be accounted for and evaluated in different types of research. As appropriate, such standards shall build on existing work on methodological standards for defined categories of health interventions and for each of the major categories of comparative clinical effectiveness research methods (determined as of the date of enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act). ‘‘(ii) A translation table that is designed to provide guidance and act as a reference for the Board to determine research methods that are most likely to address each specific research question. ‘‘(D) CONSULTATION AND CONDUCT OF EXAMINATIONS.— The methodology committee may consult and contract with the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies and academic, nonprofit, or other private and governmental entities with relevant expertise to carry out activities described in subparagraph (C) and may consult with relevant stakeholders to carry out such activities. ‘‘(E) REPORTS.—The methodology committee shall submit reports to the Board on the committee’s performance of the functions described in subparagraph (C). Reports shall contain recommendations for the Institute to adopt methodological standards developed and updated by the methodology committee as well as other actions deemed necessary to comply with such methodological standards. ‘‘(7) PROVIDING FOR A PEER-REVIEW PROCESS FOR PRIMARY RESEARCH.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Institute shall ensure that there is a process for peer review of primary research described in subparagraph (A)(ii) of paragraph (2) that is conducted under such paragraph. Under such process— ‘‘(i) evidence from such primary research shall be reviewed to assess scientific integrity and adherence to methodological standards adopted under paragraph (9); and ‘‘(ii) a list of the names of individuals contributing to any peer-review process during the preceding year or years shall be made public and included in annual reports in accordance with paragraph (10)(D). ‘‘(B) COMPOSITION.—Such peer-review process shall be designed in a manner so as to avoid bias and conflicts of interest on the part of the reviewers and shall be composed of experts in the scientific field relevant to the research under review. ‘‘(C) USE OF EXISTING PROCESSES.— ‘‘(i) PROCESSES OF ANOTHER ENTITY.—In the case where the Institute enters into a contract or other agreement with another entity for the conduct or management of research under this section, the Institute may utilize the peer-review process of such entity if such process meets the requirements under subparagraphs (A) and (B). ‘‘(ii) PROCESSES OF APPROPRIATE MEDICAL JOUR- NALS.—The Institute may utilize the peer-review process of appropriate medical journals if such process meets the requirements under subparagraphs (A) and (B). ‘‘(8) RELEASE OF RESEARCH FINDINGS.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Institute shall, not later than 90 days after the conduct or receipt of research findings under this part, make such research findings available to clinicians, patients, and the general public. The Institute shall ensure that the research findings— ‘‘(i) convey the findings of research in a manner that is comprehensible and useful to patients and providers in making health care decisions; ‘‘(ii) fully convey findings and discuss considerations specific to certain subpopulations, risk factors, and comorbidities, as appropriate; ‘‘(iii) include limitations of the research and what further research may be needed as appropriate; ‘‘(iv) do not include practice guidelines, coverage recommendations, payment, or policy recommendations; and øAs revised by section 10602(2)¿ ‘‘(v) not include any data which would violate the privacy of research participants or any confidentiality agreements made with respect to the use of data under this section. ‘‘(B) DEFINITION OF RESEARCH FINDINGS.—In this paragraph, the term ‘research findings’ means the results of a study or assessment. ‘‘(9) ADOPTION.—Subject to subsection (h)(1), the Institute shall adopt the national priorities identified under paragraph (1)(A), the research project agenda established under paragraph (1)(B), the methodological standards developed and updated by the methodology committee under paragraph (6)(C)(i), and any peer-review process provided under paragraph (7) by majority vote. In the case where the Institute does not adopt such processes in accordance with the preceding sentence, the processes shall be referred to the appropriate staff or entity within the Institute (or, in the case of the methodological standards, the methodology committee) for further review. ‘‘(10) ANNUAL REPORTS.—The Institute shall submit an annual report to Congress and the President, and shall make the annual report available to the public. Such report shall contain— ‘‘(A) a description of the activities conducted under this section, research priorities identified under paragraph (1)(A) and methodological standards developed and updated by the methodology committee under paragraph (6)(C)(i) that are adopted under paragraph (9) during the preceding year; ‘‘(B) the research project agenda and budget of the Institute for the following year; ‘‘(C) any administrative activities conducted by the Institute during the preceding year; ‘‘(D) the names of individuals contributing to any peerreview process under paragraph (7), without identifying them with a particular research project; and ‘‘(E) any other relevant information (including information on the membership of the Board, expert advisory panels, methodology committee, and the executive staff of the Institute, any conflicts of interest with respect to these individuals, and any bylaws adopted by the Board during the preceding year). ‘‘(e) ADMINISTRATION.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), the Board shall carry out the duties of the Institute. ‘‘(2) NONDELEGABLE DUTIES.—The activities described in subsections (d)(1) and (d)(9) are nondelegable. ‘‘(f) BOARD OF GOVERNORS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Institute shall have a Board of Governors, which shall consist of the following members: ‘‘(A) The Director of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (or the Director’s designee). ‘‘(B) The Director of the National Institutes of Health (or the Director’s designee). ‘‘(C) Seventeen members appointed, not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this section, by the Comptroller General of the United States as follows: ‘‘(i) 3 members representing patients and health care consumers. ‘‘(ii) 7 members representing physicians and providers, including 4 members representing physicians (at least 1 of whom is a surgeon), 1 nurse, 1 State-licensed integrative health care practitioner, and 1 representative of a hospital. øReplaced by section 10602(3)¿ ‘‘(iii) 3 members representing private payers, of whom at least 1 member shall represent health insurance issuers and at least 1 member shall represent employers who self-insure employee benefits. ‘‘(iv) 3 members representing pharmaceutical, device, and diagnostic manufacturers or developers. ‘‘(v) 1 member representing quality improvement or independent health service researchers. ‘‘(vi) 2 members representing the Federal Government or the States, including at least 1 member representing a Federal health program or agency. ‘‘(2) QUALIFICATIONS.—The Board shall represent a broad range of perspectives and collectively have scientific expertise in clinical health sciences research, including epidemiology, decisions sciences, health economics, and statistics. In appointing the Board, the Comptroller General of the United States shall consider and disclose any conflicts of interest in accordance with subsection (h)(4)(B). Members of the Board shall be recused from relevant Institute activities in the case where the member (or an immediate family member of such member) has a real conflict of interest directly related to the research project or the matter that could affect or be affected by such participation. ‘‘(3) TERMS; VACANCIES.—A member of the Board shall be appointed for a term of 6 years, except with respect to the members first appointed, whose terms of appointment shall be staggered evenly over 2-year increments. No individual shall be appointed to the Board for more than 2 terms. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment was made. ‘‘(4) CHAIRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPERSON.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall designate a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board from among the members of the Board. Such members shall serve as Chairperson or Vice Chairperson for a period of 3 years. ‘‘(5) COMPENSATION.—Each member of the Board who is not an officer or employee of the Federal Government shall be entitled to compensation (equivalent to the rate provided for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code) and expenses incurred while performing the duties of the Board. An officer or employee of the Federal government who is a member of the Board shall be exempt from compensation. ‘‘(6) DIRECTOR AND STAFF; EXPERTS AND CONSULTANTS.— The Board may employ and fix the compensation of an Executive Director and such other personnel as may be necessary to carry out the duties of the Institute and may seek such assistance and support of, or contract with, experts and consultants that may be necessary for the performance of the duties of the Institute. ‘‘(7) MEETINGS AND HEARINGS.—The Board shall meet and hold hearings at the call of the Chairperson or a majority of its members. Meetings not solely concerning matters of personnel shall be advertised at least 7 days in advance and open to the public. A majority of the Board members shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may meet and hold hearings. ‘‘(g) FINANCIAL AND GOVERNMENTAL OVERSIGHT.— ‘‘(1) CONTRACT FOR AUDIT.—The Institute shall provide for the conduct of financial audits of the Institute on an annual basis by a private entity with expertise in conducting financial audits. ‘‘(2) REVIEW AND ANNUAL REPORTS.— ‘‘(A) REVIEW.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the following: ‘‘(i) Not less frequently than on an annual basis, the financial audits conducted under paragraph (1). ‘‘(ii) Not less frequently than every 5 years, the processes established by the Institute, including the research priorities and the conduct of research projects, in order to determine whether information produced by such research projects is objective and credible, is produced in a manner consistent with the requirements under this section, and is developed through a transparent process. ‘‘(iii) Not less frequently than every 5 years, the dissemination and training activities and data networks established under section 937 of the Public Health Service Act, including the methods and products used to disseminate research, the types of training conducted and supported, and the types and functions of the data networks established, in order to determine whether the activities and data are produced in a manner consistent with the requirements under such section. ‘‘(iv) Not less frequently than every 5 years, the overall effectiveness of activities conducted under this section and the dissemination, training, and capacity building activities conducted under section 937 of the Public Health Service Act. Such review shall include an analysis of the extent to which research findings are used by health care decision-makers, the effect of the dissemination of such findings on reducing practice variation and disparities in health care, and the effect of the research conducted and disseminated on innovation and the health care economy of the United States. ‘‘(v) Not later than 8 years after the date of enactment of this section, the adequacy and use of the funding for the Institute and the activities conducted under section 937 of the Public Health Service Act, including a determination as to whether, based on the utilization of research findings by public and private payers, funding sources for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund under section 9511 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are appropriate and whether such sources of funding should be continued or adjusted. ‘‘(B) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not later than April 1 of each year, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the review conducted under subparagraph (A) with respect to the preceding year (or years, if applicable), together with recommendations for such legislation and administrative action as the Comptroller General determines appropriate. ‘‘(h) ENSURING TRANSPARENCY, CREDIBILITY, AND ACCESS.—The Institute shall establish procedures to ensure that the following requirements for ensuring transparency, credibility, and access are met: ‘‘(1) PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS.—The Institute shall provide for a public comment period of not less than 45 days and not more than 60 days prior to the adoption under subsection (d)(9) of the national priorities identified under subsection (d)(1)(A), the research project agenda established under subsection (d)(1)(B), the methodological standards developed and updated by the methodology committee under subsection (d)(6)(C)(i), and the peer-review process provided under paragraph (7), and after the release of draft findings with respect to systematic reviews of existing research and evidence. ‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL FORUMS.—The Institute shall support forums to increase public awareness and obtain and incorporate public input and feedback through media (such as an Internet website) on research priorities, research findings, and other duties, activities, or processes the Institute determines appropriate. ‘‘(3) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—The Institute shall make available to the public and disclose through the official public Internet website of the Institute the following: ‘‘(A) Information contained in research findings as specified in subsection (d)(9). ‘‘(B) The process and methods for the conduct of research, including the identity of the entity and the investigators conducing such research and any conflicts of interests of such parties, any direct or indirect links the entity has to industry, and research protocols, including measures taken, methods of research and analysis, research results, and such other information the Institute determines appropriate) concurrent with the release of research findings. ‘‘(C) Notice of public comment periods under paragraph (1), including deadlines for public comments. ‘‘(D) Subsequent comments received during each of the public comment periods. ‘‘(E) In accordance with applicable laws and processes and as the Institute determines appropriate, proceedings of the Institute. ‘‘(4) DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A conflict of interest shall be disclosed in the following manner: ‘‘(i) By the Institute in appointing members to an expert advisory panel under subsection (d)(4), in selecting individuals to contribute to any peer-review process under subsection (d)(7), and for employment as executive staff of the Institute. ‘‘(ii) By the Comptroller General in appointing members of the methodology committee under subsection (d)(6); ‘‘(iii) By the Institute in the annual report under subsection (d)(10), except that, in the case of individuals contributing to any such peer review process, such description shall be in a manner such that those individuals cannot be identified with a particular research project. ‘‘(B) MANNER OF DISCLOSURE.—Conflicts of interest shall be disclosed as described in subparagraph (A) as soon as practicable on the Internet web site of the Institute and of the Government Accountability Office. The information disclosed under the preceding sentence shall include the type, nature, and magnitude of the interests of the individual involved, except to the extent that the individual recuses himself or herself from participating in the consideration of or any other activity with respect to the study as to which the potential conflict exists. ‘‘(i) RULES.—The Institute, its Board or staff, shall be prohibited from accepting gifts, bequeaths, or donations of services or property. In addition, the Institute shall be prohibited from establishing a corporation or generating revenues from activities other than as provided under this section. ‘‘(j) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.— ‘‘(1) COVERAGE.—Nothing in this section shall be construed— ‘‘(A) to permit the Institute to mandate coverage, reimbursement, or other policies for any public or private payer; or ‘‘(B) as preventing the Secretary from covering the routine costs of clinical care received by an individual entitled to, or enrolled for, benefits under title XVIII, XIX, or XXI in the case where such individual is participating in a clinical trial and such costs would otherwise be covered under such title with respect to the beneficiary.’’. (b) DISSEMINATION AND BUILDING CAPACITY FOR RESEARCH.— Title IX of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 299 et seq.), as amended by section 3606, is further amended by inserting after section 936 the following: ‘‘SEC. 937 ø42 U.S.C. 299b–37¿. DISSEMINATION AND BUILDING CAPACITY FOR RESEARCH. ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— ‘‘(1) DISSEMINATION.—The Office of Communication and Knowledge Transfer (referred to in this section as the ‘Office’) at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (or any other relevant office designated by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), in consultation with the National Institutes of Health, shall broadly disseminate the research findings that are published by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute established under section 1181(b) of the Social Security Act (referred to in this section as the ‘Institute’) and other government-funded research relevant to comparative clinical effectiveness research. The Office shall create informational tools that organize and disseminate research findings for physicians, health care providers, patients, payers, and policy makers. The Office shall also develop a publicly available resource database that collects and contains government-funded evidence and research from public, private, not-for profit, and academic sources. ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The Office shall provide for the dissemination of the Institute’s research findings and government-funded research relevant to comparative clinical effectiveness research to physicians, health care providers, patients, vendors of health information technology focused on clinical decision support, appropriate professional associations, and Federal and private health plans. Materials, forums, and media used to disseminate the findings, informational tools, and resource databases shall— ‘‘(A) include a description of considerations for specific subpopulations, the research methodology, and the limitations of the research, and the names of the entities, agencies, instrumentalities, and individuals who conducted any research which was published by the Institute; and ‘‘(B) not be construed as mandates, guidelines, or recommendations for payment, coverage, or treatment. ‘‘(b) INCORPORATION OF RESEARCH FINDINGS.—The Office, in consultation with relevant medical and clinical associations, shall assist users of health information technology focused on clinical decision support to promote the timely incorporation of research findings disseminated under subsection (a) into clinical practices and to promote the ease of use of such incorporation. ‘‘(c) FEEDBACK.—The Office shall establish a process to receive feedback from physicians, health care providers, patients, and vendors of health information technology focused on clinical decision support, appropriate professional associations, and Federal and private health plans about the value of the information disseminated and the assistance provided under this section. ‘‘(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall preclude the Institute from making its research findings publicly available as required under section 1181(d)(8) of the Social Security Act. ‘‘(e) TRAINING OF RESEARCHERS.—The Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, in consultation with the National Institutes of Health, shall build capacity for comparative clinical effectiveness research by establishing a grant program that provides for the training of researchers in the methods used to conduct such research, including systematic reviews of existing research and primary research such as clinical trials. At a minimum, such training shall be in methods that meet the methodological standards adopted under section 1181(d)(9) of the Social Security Act. ‘‘(f) BUILDING DATA FOR RESEARCH.—The Secretary shall provide for the coordination of relevant Federal health programs to build data capacity for comparative clinical effectiveness research, including the development and use of clinical registries and health outcomes research data networks, in order to develop and maintain a comprehensive, interoperable data network to collect, link, and analyze data on outcomes and effectiveness from multiple sources, including electronic health records. ‘‘(g) AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT WITH THE INSTITUTE.—Agencies and instrumentalities of the Federal Government may enter into agreements with the Institute, and accept and retain funds, for the conduct and support of research described in this part, provided that the research to be conducted or supported under such agreements is authorized under the governing statutes of such agencies and instrumentalities.’’. (c) IN GENERAL.—Part D of title XI of the Social Security Act, as added by subsection (a), is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘‘LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN USES OF COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH ‘‘SEC. 1182 ø42 U.S.C. 1320e–1¿. (a) The Secretary may only use evidence and findings from research conducted under section 1181 to make a determination regarding coverage under title XVIII if such use is through an iterative and transparent process which includes public comment and considers the effect on subpopulations. ‘‘(b) Nothing in section 1181 shall be construed as— ‘‘(1) superceding or modifying the coverage of items or services under title XVIII that the Secretary determines are reasonable and necessary under section 1862(l)(1); or ‘‘(2) authorizing the Secretary to deny coverage of items or services under such title solely on the basis of comparative clinical effectiveness research. ‘‘(c)(1) The Secretary shall not use evidence or findings from comparative clinical effectiveness research conducted under section 1181 in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII in a manner that treats extending the life of an elderly, disabled, or terminally ill individual as of lower value than extending the life of an individual who is younger, nondisabled, or not terminally ill. ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as preventing the Secretary from using evidence or findings from such comparative clinical effectiveness research in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII based upon a comparison of the difference in the effectiveness of alternative treatments in extending an individual’s life due to the individual’s age, disability, or terminal illness. ‘‘(d)(1) The Secretary shall not use evidence or findings from comparative clinical effectiveness research conducted under section 1181 in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII in a manner that precludes, or with the intent to discourage, an individual from choosing a health care treatment based on how the individual values the tradeoff between extending the length of their life and the risk of disability. ‘‘(2)(A) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed to— ‘‘(i) limit the application of differential copayments under title XVIII based on factors such as cost or type of service; or ‘‘(ii) prevent the Secretary from using evidence or findings from such comparative clinical effectiveness research in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under such title based upon a comparison of the difference in the effectiveness of alternative health care treatments in extending an individual’s life due to that individual’s age, disability, or terminal illness. ‘‘(3) Nothing in the provisions of, or amendments made by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, shall be construed to limit comparative clinical effectiveness research or any other research, evaluation, or dissemination of information concerning the likelihood that a health care treatment will result in disability. ‘‘(e) The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute established under section 1181(b)(1) shall not develop or employ a dollars-per-quality adjusted life year (or similar measure that discounts the value of a life because of an individual’s disability) as a threshold to establish what type of health care is cost effective or recommended. The Secretary shall not utilize such an adjusted life year (or such a similar measure) as a threshold to determine coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII.’’. (d) IN GENERAL.—Part D of title XI of the Social Security Act, as added by subsection (a) and amended by subsection (c), is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘‘TRUST FUND TRANSFERS TO PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH TRUST FUND ‘‘SEC. 1183 ø42 U.S.C. 1320e–2¿. (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall provide for the transfer, from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund under section 1817 and the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund under section 1841, in proportion (as estimated by the Secretary) to the total expenditures during such fiscal year that are made under title XVIII from the respective trust fund, to the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (referred to in this section as the ‘PCORTF’) under section 9511 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, of the following: ‘‘(1) For fiscal year 2013, an amount equal to $1 multiplied by the average number of individuals entitled to benefits under part A, or enrolled under part B, of title XVIII during such fiscal year. ‘‘(2) For each of fiscal years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019, an amount equal to $2 multiplied by the average number of individuals entitled to benefits under part A, or enrolled under part B, of title XVIII during such fiscal year. ‘‘(b) ADJUSTMENTS FOR INCREASES IN HEALTH CARE SPENDING.—In the case of any fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2014, the dollar amount in effect under subsection (a)(2) for such fiscal year shall be equal to the sum of such dollar amount for the previous fiscal year (determined after the application of this subsection), plus an amount equal to the product of— ‘‘(1) such dollar amount for the previous fiscal year, multiplied by ‘‘(2) the percentage increase in the projected per capita amount of National Health Expenditures, as most recently published by the Secretary before the beginning of the fiscal year.’’. (e) PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH TRUST FUND; FINANCING FOR TRUST FUND.— (1) ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUST FUND.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter A of chapter 98 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to establishment of trust funds) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ‘‘SEC. 9511. PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH TRUST FUND. ‘‘(a) CREATION OF TRUST FUND.—There is established in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as the ‘Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund’ (hereafter in this section referred to as the ‘PCORTF’), consisting of such amounts as may be appropriated or credited to such Trust Fund as provided in this section and section 9602(b). ‘‘(b) TRANSFERS TO FUND.—‘‘(1) APPROPRIATION.—There are hereby appropriated to the Trust Fund the following: ‘‘(A) For fiscal year 2010, $10,000,000. ‘‘(B) For fiscal year 2011, $50,000,000. ‘‘(C) For fiscal year 2012, $150,000,000. ‘‘(D) For fiscal year 2013— ‘‘(i) an amount equivalent to the net revenues received in the Treasury from the fees imposed under subchapter B of chapter 34 (relating to fees on health insurance and self-insured plans) for such fiscal year; and ‘‘(ii) $150,000,000. ‘‘(E) For each of fiscal years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019— ‘‘(i) an amount equivalent to the net revenues received in the Treasury from the fees imposed under subchapter B of chapter 34 (relating to fees on health insurance and self-insured plans) for such fiscal year; and ‘‘(ii) $150,000,000. The amounts appropriated under subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), and (E)(ii) shall be transferred from the general fund of the Treasury, from funds not otherwise appropriated. ‘‘(2) TRUST FUND TRANSFERS.—In addition to the amounts appropriated under paragraph (1), there shall be credited to the PCORTF the amounts transferred under section 1183 of the Social Security Act. ‘‘(3) LIMITATION ON TRANSFERS TO PCORTF.—No amount may be appropriated or transferred to the PCORTF on and after the date of any expenditure from the PCORTF which is not an expenditure permitted under this section. The determination of whether an expenditure is so permitted shall be made without regard to— ‘‘(A) any provision of law which is not contained or referenced in this chapter or in a revenue Act, and ‘‘(B) whether such provision of law is a subsequently enacted provision or directly or indirectly seeks to waive the application of this paragraph. ‘‘(c) TRUSTEE.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall be a trustee of the PCORTF. ‘‘(d) EXPENDITURES FROM FUND.— ‘‘(1) AMOUNTS AVAILABLE TO THE PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE.—Subject to paragraph (2), amounts in the PCORTF are available, without further appropriation, to the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute established under section 1181(b) of the Social Security Act for carrying out part D of title XI of the Social Security Act (as in effect on the date of enactment of such Act). ‘‘(2) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The trustee of the PCORTF shall provide for the transfer from the PCORTF of 20 percent of the amounts appropriated or credited to the PCORTF for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2019 to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to carry out section 937 of the Public Health Service Act. ‘‘(B) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts transferred under subparagraph (A) shall remain available until expended. ‘‘(C) REQUIREMENTS.—Of the amounts transferred under subparagraph (A) with respect to a fiscal year, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall distribute— ‘‘(i) 80 percent to the Office of Communication and Knowledge Transfer of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (or any other relevant office designated by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) to carry out the activities described in section 937 of the Public Health Service Act; and ‘‘(ii) 20 percent to the Secretary to carry out the activities described in such section 937. ‘‘(e) NET REVENUES.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘net revenues’ means the amount estimated by the Secretary of the Treasury based on the excess of— ‘‘(1) the fees received in the Treasury under subchapter B of chapter 34, over ‘‘(2) the decrease in the tax imposed by chapter 1 resulting from the fees imposed by such subchapter. ‘‘(f) TERMINATION.—No amounts shall be available for expenditure from the PCORTF after September 30, 2019, and any amounts in such Trust Fund after such date shall be transferred to the general fund of the Treasury.’’. (B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for subchapter A of chapter 98 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new item: ‘‘Sec. 9511. Patient-centered outcomes research trust fund.’’. (2) FINANCING FOR FUND FROM FEES ON INSURED AND SELFINSURED HEALTH PLANS.— (A) GENERAL RULE.—Chapter 34 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subchapter: ‘‘Subchapter B—Insured and Self-Insured Health Plans ‘‘Sec. 4375. Health insurance. ‘‘Sec. 4376. Self-insured health plans. ‘‘Sec. 4377. Definitions and special rules. ‘‘SEC. 4375. HEALTH INSURANCE. ‘‘(a) IMPOSITION OF FEE.—There is hereby imposed on each specified health insurance policy for each policy year ending after September 30, 2012, a fee equal to the product of $2 ($1 in the case of policy years ending during fiscal year 2013) multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the policy. ‘‘(b) LIABILITY FOR FEE.—The fee imposed by subsection (a) shall be paid by the issuer of the policy. ‘‘(c) SPECIFIED HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY.—For purposes of this section: ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, the term ‘specified health insurance policy’ means any accident or health insurance policy (including a policy under a group health plan) issued with respect to individuals residing in the United States. ‘‘(2) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN POLICIES.—The term ‘specified health insurance policy’ does not include any insurance if substantially all of its coverage is of excepted benefits described in section 9832(c). ‘‘(3) TREATMENT OF PREPAID HEALTH COVERAGE ARRANGEMENTS.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any arrangement described in subparagraph (B), such arrangement shall be treated as a specified health insurance policy, and the person referred to in such subparagraph shall be treated as the issuer. ‘‘(B) DESCRIPTION OF ARRANGEMENTS.—An arrangement is described in this subparagraph if under such arrangement fixed payments or premiums are received as consideration for any person’s agreement to provide or arrange for the provision of accident or health coverage to residents of the United States, regardless of how such coverage is provided or arranged to be provided. ‘‘(d) ADJUSTMENTS FOR INCREASES IN HEALTH CARE SPENDING.—In the case of any policy year ending in any fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2014, the dollar amount in effect under subsection (a) for such policy year shall be equal to the sum of such dollar amount for policy years ending in the previous fiscal year (determined after the application of this subsection), plus an amount equal to the product of— ‘‘(1) such dollar amount for policy years ending in the previous fiscal year, multiplied by ‘‘(2) the percentage increase in the projected per capita amount of National Health Expenditures, as most recently published by the Secretary before the beginning of the fiscal year. ‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to policy years ending after September 30, 2019. ‘‘SEC. 4376. SELF-INSURED HEALTH PLANS. ‘‘(a) IMPOSITION OF FEE.—In the case of any applicable self-insured health plan for each plan year ending after September 30, 2012, there is hereby imposed a fee equal to $2 ($1 in the case of plan years ending during fiscal year 2013) multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the plan. ‘‘(b) LIABILITY FOR FEE.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The fee imposed by subsection (a) shall be paid by the plan sponsor. ‘‘(2) PLAN SPONSOR.—For purposes of paragraph (1) the term ‘plan sponsor’ means— ‘‘(A) the employer in the case of a plan established or maintained by a single employer, ‘‘(B) the employee organization in the case of a plan established or maintained by an employee organization, ‘‘(C) in the case of—‘‘(i) a plan established or maintained by 2 or more employers or jointly by 1 or more employers and 1 or more employee organizations, ‘‘(ii) a multiple employer welfare arrangement, or ‘‘(iii) a voluntary employees’ beneficiary association described in section 501(c)(9), the association, committee, joint board of trustees, or other similar group of representatives of the parties who establish or maintain the plan, or ‘‘(D) the cooperative or association described in subsection (c)(2)(F) in the case of a plan established or maintained by such a cooperative or association. ‘‘(c) APPLICABLE SELF-INSURED HEALTH PLAN.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘applicable self-insured health plan’ means any plan for providing accident or health coverage if— ‘‘(1) any portion of such coverage is provided other than through an insurance policy, and ‘‘(2) such plan is established or maintained— ‘‘(A) by 1 or more employers for the benefit of their employees or former employees, ‘‘(B) by 1 or more employee organizations for the benefit of their members or former members, ‘‘(C) jointly by 1 or more employers and 1 or more employee organizations for the benefit of employees or former employees, ‘‘(D) by a voluntary employees’ beneficiary association described in section 501(c)(9), ‘‘(E) by any organization described in section 501(c)(6), or ‘‘(F) in the case of a plan not described in the preceding subparagraphs, by a multiple employer welfare arrangement (as defined in section 3(40) of Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974), a rural electric cooperative (as defined in section 3(40)(B)(iv) of such Act), or a rural telephone cooperative association (as defined in section 3(40)(B)(v) of such Act). ‘‘(d) ADJUSTMENTS FOR INCREASES IN HEALTH CARE SPENDING.—In the case of any plan year ending in any fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2014, the dollar amount in effect under subsection (a) for such plan year shall be equal to the sum of such dollar amount for plan years ending in the previous fiscal year (determined after the application of this subsection), plus an amount equal to the product of— ‘‘(1) such dollar amount for plan years ending in the previous fiscal year, multiplied by ‘‘(2) the percentage increase in the projected per capita amount of National Health Expenditures, as most recently published by the Secretary before the beginning of the fiscal year. ‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to plan years ending after September 30, 2019. ‘‘SEC. 4377. DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL RULES. ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this subchapter—‘‘(1) ACCIDENT AND HEALTH COVERAGE.—The term ‘accident and health coverage’ means any coverage which, if provided by an insurance policy, would cause such policy to be a specified health insurance policy (as defined in section 4375(c)). ‘‘(2) INSURANCE POLICY.—The term ‘insurance policy’ means any policy or other instrument whereby a contract of insurance is issued, renewed, or extended. ‘‘(3) UNITED STATES.—The term ‘United States’ includes any possession of the United States. ‘‘(b) TREATMENT OF GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this subchapter— ‘‘(A) the term ‘person’ includes any governmental entity, and ‘‘(B) notwithstanding any other law or rule of law, governmental entities shall not be exempt from the fees imposed by this subchapter except as provided in paragraph (2). ‘‘(2) TREATMENT OF EXEMPT GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS.—In the case of an exempt governmental program, no fee shall be imposed under section 4375 or section 4376 on any covered life under such program. ‘‘(3) EXEMPT GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAM DEFINED.—For purposes of this subchapter, the term ‘exempt governmental program’ means— ‘‘(A) any insurance program established under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, ‘‘(B) the medical assistance program established by title XIX or XXI of the Social Security Act, ‘‘(C) any program established by Federal law for providing medical care (other than through insurance policies) to individuals (or the spouses and dependents thereof) by reason of such individuals being members of the Armed Forces of the United States or veterans, and ‘‘(D) any program established by Federal law for providing medical care (other than through insurance policies) to members of Indian tribes (as defined in section 4(d) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act). ‘‘(c) TREATMENT AS TAX.—For purposes of subtitle F, the fees imposed by this subchapter shall be treated as if they were taxes. ‘‘(d) NO COVER OVER TO POSSESSIONS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no amount collected under this subchapter shall be covered over to any possession of the United States.’’. (B) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— (i) Chapter 34 of such Code is amended by striking the chapter heading and inserting the following: ‘‘CHAPTER 34—TAXES ON CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES ‘‘SUBCHAPTER A. POLICIES ISSUED BY FOREIGN INSURERS ‘‘SUBCHAPTER B. INSURED AND SELF-INSURED HEALTH PLANS ‘‘Subchapter A—Policies Issued By Foreign Insurers’’. (ii) The table of chapters for subtitle D of such Code is amended by striking the item relating to chapter 34 and inserting the following new item: ‘‘CHAPTER 34—TAXES ON CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES’’. (f) TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF THE PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE.—Subsection 501(l) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘‘(4) The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute established under section 1181(b) of the Social Security Act.’’. SEC. 6302. FEDERAL COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research established under section 804 of Division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (42 U.S.C. 299b–8), including the requirement under subsection (e)(2) of such section, shall terminate on the date of enactment of this Act.

Browse ACA Titles

  • I-Quality, Affordable Health Care for all Americans
  • II-Role of Public Programs
  • III-Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Health Care
  • IV-Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving Public Health
  • V-Health Care Workforce
  • VI-Transparency and Program Integrity
  • VII-Improving Access to Innovative Medical Therapies
  • VIII-Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS ACT)
  • IX-Revenue Provisions

ABOUT

  • Home
  • About Policy Hub
  • Free Newsletter
  • Team
  • Mission and Values
  • Contact Us

Contact Us

Impact Health Policy Partners 1301 K Street, NW, Suite 300W
Washington, D.C. 20005

(202) 309-0796
Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 ‐ Impact Health Policy Partners ‐ All Rights Reserved ‐ Privacy Policy ‐ Terms and Conditions ‐ Log in