My Policy Hub

Improving health is our policy

  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact

ACA Now

1401 - Refundable Tax Credit Providing Premium Assistance for Coverage under a Qualified Health Plan

 
Implementation Status 
Statutory Text 

Summary

Amended by sections 1001 of HCERA and 10105 of the Manager’s Amendment. Creates a refundable credit for premium assistance to be used for Qualified Health Plans (QHPs).

Specifies that the credit is the lesser of the monthly premiums for 1 or more QHPs offered in the individual market within a State which cover the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse or any dependent or the excess (if any) over the adjusted monthly premium for the applicable second-lowest-cost silver plan as specified by an “applicable percentage” of monthly household income – based on the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) – on a sliding scale between 2 percent (up to 133 percent FPL) to 9.5 percent (400 percent FPL).

Provides for indexing of the applicable percentages of taxpayers’ household income starting in 2015 to reflect the excess of the rate of premium growth over the rate of income growth for the preceding calendar year, as well as for an additional adjustment starting in 2019 based on the excess (if any) of the rate of premium growth estimated under indexing over the rate of growth in the consumer price index. Provides for a failsafe if the aggregate amount of premium tax credits under this section and cost-sharing reductions under section 1402 exceeds 0.504 percent of GDP.

Defines adjusted monthly premium – adjusted for age – that is considered for premium tax credit purposes and specifies that if a State requires additional benefits beyond essential health benefits, the portion of the premium allocable to such additional benefits is not taken into account in determining either the monthly premium or the adjusted monthly premium under this section. Provides that employees can receive premium tax credits even if they are eligible for employer-sponsored coverage if their contribution to that coverage exceeds 9.5 percent of their household income or if the employer-sponsored coverage does not provide minimum value, defined as an actuarial value of at least 60 percent. Includes provisions regarding the reconciliation of the credit and advance credit as well as any excess payments. Requires a GAO report within 5 years on issues including the impact of the tax credit on maintaining and expanding coverage.

Effective for taxable years ending after December 31, 2013.

#Health Insurance Exchanges, #Qualified Health Plans, #Subsidies

Implementation Status

 
Summary 
Statutory Text 

The healthcare.gov website maintains a general page on this provision. Additionally, an August 12, 2011, Treasury fact sheet provides an overview of the premium tax credit.

2010

The December 30, 2010, Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010 increased the limitation on the aggregate amount of the advance premium tax credit that can be recaptured upon reconciliation with the actual amount.

2011

The Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011, which was enacted on April 14, 2011 (full statutory text available here), further modified the thresholds for recapturing excess advance premium tax credit amounts.

The Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, enacted on April 15, 2011, repealed the free choice voucher requirement under section 10108, provisions related to which had been noted under section 1401 (conforming changes were therefore made).

2012

IRS Notice 2012-31 (April 26, 2012) solicits comment and furnishes some details on potential approaches to assessing if employer-sponsored plans provide “minimum value.”

On May 23, 2012, Treasury released a final rule on this tax credit for health insurance premiums.

On December 28, 2012, the GAO released a report examining the expiration of the Health Coverage Tax Credit (HCTC), and specifically, how the implementation of the ACA premium tax credits, cost-sharing subsidies and Medicaid expansion will affect HCTC participants’ costs for health plans in multiple ways.

2013

On January 30, 2013, Treasury issued final regulations on the premium tax credit affordability test for related individuals. This provides “guidance to individuals related to employees who may enroll in eligible employer-sponsored coverage and who wish to enroll in qualified health plans through Affordable Insurance Exchanges (Exchanges) and claim the premium tax credit.”

HHS’s March 11, 2013, final rule – the Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2014 – finalizes several provisions relating to the administration of advance payments of the premium tax credit.

On April 30, 2013, the IRS released a proposed rule regarding the minimum value (MV) of eligible employer-sponsored plans and other issues related to the health insurance premium tax credit. The rule addresses several considerations relating to calculating MV and assessing affordability of employer-sponsored coverage, as factors related to employees’ eligibility to access subsidies in the Exchange, including such issues as wellness program incentives and HRA contributions.

The application window for submitting Qualified Health Plan (QHP) applications for Federally Facilitated Marketplaces closed on May 3. CCIIO continues to post detailed operational guidance on the Registration for Technical Assistance Portal (registration required) about Federally Facilitated Marketplaces and other topics (see the “About REGTAP” page). Additional developments include:

On May 1, CCIIO posted guidance regarding the role agents, brokers and web-based brokers may perform in Health Insurance Marketplaces and how they can be compensated.

On May 10, CCIIO released FAQs on Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP)-only Marketplaces indicating its intent to proposed rule-making allowing all States, in 2015, to have the option of running State-Based SHOPs while having Federally Facilitated Individual Marketplaces. The FAQs indicate that this option would be available in 2014 only to States that submitted blueprints and were conditionally approved as State-Based Marketplaces. CCIIO Director Gary Cohen wrote a May 10 letter to Utah Governor Gary Herbert regarding this 2014 pathway for Utah’s Avenue H.

On May 13, CCIIO posted a presentation regarding the Minimum Value (MV) Calculator, referencing HHS’s finalized policy on section 1302(d)(2)(c) of the Affordable Care Act (regarding the calculation of actuarial value) and reviewing the MV Calculator’s development, design and process.

On May 13, CCIIO posted FAQs on essential community providers (ECPs), noting, among other things, that “CMS is simply alerting providers that serve predominantly low-income and medically underserved individuals of an important potential new opportunity to participate in a QHP issuer’s network,” adding that “[i]ssuer requirements of providers serving in their networks will vary.” CCIIO Director Gary Cohen also wrote a letter to ECPs referencing the FAQs, noting the availability of an HHS inbox (essentialcommunityproviders@cms.hhs.gov) for queries and encouraging ECPs to consider participating in QHP networks.

On May 13, CCIIO released FAQs on allowable uses of section 1311 funds in States with a State Consumer Partnership Marketplace. A non-exhaustive list of potentially eligible activities is detailed in a table, including those involving consumer and stakeholder engagement and support, SHOP and contracting and outsourcing and agreements.  An additional FAQ addresses allowable uses of 1311 funds for States in a State Partnership or Federally Facilitated Marketplace.

On May 14, CCIIO posted a presentation outlining the Navigator program and other Marketplace consumer assistance personnel.

On May 14, Senate Finance Committee Republicans wrote a letter to HHS regarding press reports that the agency had encouraged private-sector contributions to Marketplace outreach and enrollment-related efforts. House Energy and Commerce Committee Republican leadership sent a letter to HHS on this issue on May 13.

On May 15, House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) and Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Charles Boustany Jr., (R-LA) sent a letter to HHS inquiring about several aspects of the Navigator program, including privacy safeguards.

On May 16, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Deputy Director for Policy and Regulation at CCIIO, updated the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission on Marketplace implementation, noting that CCIIO has completed the “vast majority” of regulatory work associated with the Marketplaces and is now focused on operational implementation, such as reviewing QHP applications submitted the window for Federally Facilitated Marketplaces. She added that HHS anticipates a June 2013 launch of a call center for Marketplace-related consumer inquiries.

On May 24, CMS posted a revised Paperwork Reduction Act package addressing cooperative agreements to support the establishment of State-operated Health Insurance Exchanges, including “substantial changes in the Establishment Review process.”

On June 26, the IRS issued a Notice, “Eligibility for Minimum Essential Coverage for Purposes of the Premium Tax Credit,” providing guidance on “whether or when, for purposes of the premium tax credit under § 36B of the Internal Revenue Code, an individual is eligible for minimum essential coverage under certain government-sponsored health programs or other coverage designated as minimum essential coverage,” such as Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, TRICARE, student health or state high risk pool programs.

On July 5, CMS issued a final rule with wide-ranging eligibility provisions, including several regarding Exchanges’ eligibility and enrollment. Specifically, before January 1, 2015, State-based Exchanges may “accept the applicant’s attestation regarding enrollment in an eligible employer-sponsored plan and eligibility for qualifying coverage in an eligible employer sponsored plan for the benefit year for which coverage is requested without further verification.” For income verification, for the first year of operations, rule note that CMS is “providing Exchanges with temporarily expanded discretion to accept an attestation of projected annual household income without further verification” applicable to individuals who are not part of a statistically-significant sampling strategy that is delineated in the rule. Other provisions address, among others, authorized representatives, enrollment-related transactions, special enrollment periods and terminations. Also see a July 8 Paperwork Reduction Act package related to information collection under the Exchange-related provisions of this rule.

On July 2, IRS published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemakingregarding the information that Exchanges are required to report to the agency regarding health insurance premium tax credits, including specific rules on reporting of information by Exchanges to help enable such functions as the reconciliation of the premium tax credit with advance credit payments. Comments are due on Sept. 3, 2013.

On August 30, HHS released a Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Package including details on information collections associated with the August 30 Marketplace Program Integrity final rule, the provisions of which addressed an aspect of the risk corridors program, agents and brokers in Federally Facilitated Marketplaces and various other issues. The PRA package also contains provisions on additional information collections related to Navigators, certified application counselors and habilitative services, among other topics.

On September 10, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee, and Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI), Chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee, wrote to Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew opposing any regulatory action to extend premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions to workers in multi-employer plans. On September 13, in a letter to Rep. Camp, Secretary Lew wrote, “the conclusion that an individual cannot benefit from both the exclusion from taxable income for employer-provided health coverage under such a plan and the premium tax credit provided by the ACA applies whether the individual is covered by a single-employer plan or a multiemployer plan.” On September 18, in a letter to Office of Management and Budget Director Sylvia Burwell, 21 Republicans said they are “troubled that the administration has only made a commitment to not move forward with a rule through the IRS, but has left the door open for the Department of Labor (DOL) to issue a regulation favoring labor unions.”

On September 12, the IRS posted a Q&A providing an overview of the premium tax credit, including an explanation of income and family size changes affecting adjustment and reconciliation of the advance and actual subsidy amount. On September 12, the House passed the No Subsidies without Verification Act (HR 2775), which, among other provisions, would preclude premium subsidies until a certified verification process is in place; the White House issued an SAP opposing the bill. On September 27, CCIIO released guidance noting that in light of a recent IRS ruling, “the eligibility rules with respect to premium tax credits under Code section 36B treat same-sex spouses in the same manner as opposite-sex spouses.” CMS said that while Federally Facilitated Marketplaces will be ready to implement the ruling by October 1, State-Based Marketplaces “may be unable to adjust systems to reflect the Ruling and this guidance by October 1, 2013” and “must implement this guidance as soon as reasonably practicable,” adding that states “must implement interim workarounds where reasonably practicable.”

On September 24, CMS sent the CY 2015 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters proposed rule to OMB for review, noting the “proposed and subsequent final rule must precede plan approval and open enrollment (must be complete by January 1, 2014).” The proposed rule is anticipated sometime in October.

On October 1, CMS posted consumer-oriented videos on Health Insurance Marketplaces and premium tax credits, among other topics. On October 28, HHS released a report finding that 46% of uninsured, single young adults ages 18-34 in 34 Federal Marketplace states could obtain bronze plans for less than $50 in post-subsidy, monthly premiums in 2014. Also see an HHS release.

On October 7, CCIIO issued an FAQ specifying that QHP issuers must send FFMs confirmed enrollments by December 16 to receive subsidy payments in January 2014. State-Based Marketplaces have the same deadline.

On October 9, Sarah Hall Ingram, director of the IRS’s ACA Office, testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on implementation of premium subsidies and enforcement of the individual mandate. She said “systems and processes the IRS has developed to support enrollment in the Marketplaces were launched on schedule and are working as planned.” See the hearing page for video.

On October 17, President Obama signed the Continuing Appropriations Act of 2014, ending a government shutdown; it embedded a provision (section 1001) relating to HHS’s ensuring and certifying to Congress that ACA income verification for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions is in place; it also requires an HHS report by Jan. 1, 2014, and an HHS OIG report by July 1, 2014.

On October 21, the IRS released a 1-pager on the premium tax credit and how consumers, depending on how they choose to avail themselves to it, if eligible, can “get it now or get it later.”

On October 24, CMS released a final rule (see a CCIIO fact sheet) codifying certain program integrity-related components of the ACA pertaining to Exchanges, premium stabilization programs and market standards that were delineated in a June 2013 proposed rule. The final rule also amends and adopts as final provisions delineated in the Amendments to the HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2014 interim final rule with comment issued in March 2013 related to risk corridors and reconciliation of cost-sharing.

On Nov. 4, CCIIO posted slides explaining the process – and specific information – required for enabling monthly cost-sharing reduction and advance premium tax credit payments to health insurers. On Nov. 6, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) asked the IRS to supply data on subsidy eligibility determinations conducted for Marketplace applicants, including the average age of those applying.

On Nov. 12, CMS posted a chart generally characterizing, based on income, whether consumers may be eligible for premium tax credits, cost-sharing reductions or Medicaid.

Also on Nov. 12, CMS posted the authorization form through which QHP issuers verify that CMS may make deposits or adjustments in transmitting premium subsidy and cost-sharing reduction payments. Also see a Financial Information Template, Bank Verification Letter Instructions and Payee and Banking Information Submission Instructions. In an e-mail, the agency notes that issuers should e-mail the template and authorization agreement to vendor_management@cms.hhs.gov, while faxing decryption codes and bank verification letters to 301-492-4746 by Dec. 1, 2013.

On Dec. 3, 2013 a newly posted Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration report, dated September 2013, indicated that the IRS’s premium tax credit systems should follow “systems development controls” for security and fraud mitigation, among other functions.

On Dec. 9, 2013, HHS’s Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) issued a report examining, in part, African Americans’ potential qualification for advance premium tax credits.

On Dec. 31, 2013 in a report required by the October 2013 budget deal and reflecting compliance with ACA requirements, Secretary Sebelius certified that Marketplaces verify applicants’ eligibility for advance payments of premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions. The report examines State-Based and Federal Marketplaces’ approaches to verifying specific data elements that range from residency to household income and family size, among others.

2014

On Jan. 15, 2014 U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman, in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to defendant HHS, ruled that the statute “must be read as allowing the IRS to deliver tax credits to individuals purchasing health insurance on federally-facilitated Exchanges”;

In mid-January 2014, CMS began paying, via an interim payment process (see Jan. 13 slides providing an overview), advance payments of the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reductions to Qualified Health Plans, net of Federally Facilitated user fees, if applicable.

On Jan. 21, 2014 HHS released its Annual Update to Poverty Guidelines that will apply to premium subsidy eligibility in 2015.

On Jan. 23, 2014, the IRS posted a fact sheet on premium tax credits, including details on claiming the credit on 2014 tax returns that will be filed in 2015.

On Jan. 30, 2014 HHS published a proposed extension to an already approved information collection (see #1, “Payment Collection Operations Contingency Plan”)  enabling it to obtain issuers’ manually entered, Excel-based payment and enrollment data used to make premium subsidy and cost-sharing reduction payments on an interim basis. The agency indicated HHS will use the information collected to make payments and collect charges in January 2014 and for a number of months thereafter, as may be required based on HHS’ operational progress.” Comments are due on or around March 30.

On Feb. 24, HHS sent the final CY 2015 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters rule to OMB for review, the final step before issuance of the regulation. It addresses ’15 parameters for ACA premium stabilization programs, as well as advance premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions.

On Feb. 5, at a House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee hearing, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen (testimony) touched on the agency’s responsibilities under the ACA, including administering premium subsidies.

On Feb. 25, as part of a consumer-oriented “Tax Tip” series, the IRS released background information on the individual mandate penalty (here) and how changes in circumstances affect premium subsidies (here), among other topics.

On March 14, CCIIO issued a bulletin clarifying Feb. 27 guidance (Word document) on the availability of retroactive premium subsidies and cost-sharing reductions if consumers had technical issues gaining eligibility determinations and effectuating their enrollment through Marketplaces. The FAQs address the applicability and timeframe for the Feb. 27 guidance, among other issues.

On March 11, CCIIO released updated examples for Qualified Health Plans using the simplified methodology for calculating cost-sharing reductions as a component of the reconciliation process outlined in the October 2013 program integrity rule. Also see an accompanying Excel document.

On March 7, CMS released a primer, “Report Life Changes to the Marketplace After You Enroll in Coverage,” that addresses factors ranging from marriage and divorce to income-related fluctuations, noting that while some changes can affect eligibility for Special Enrollment Periods, others may affect premium tax credit amounts, among other impacts.

In a March 25 letter to House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, CBO writes, on premium subsidies, that “high rates of growth projected for the next several years reflect a startup period for the new program,” from $15B in 2014 to $41B in 2015 and rising to $143B in 2024. On March 26, noting that domestic abuse victims face barriers to filing joint returns and accessing premium subsidies, the Treasury highlighted (fact sheet) the head-of-household filing option and provided additional guidance for 2014. Specifically, it said “a married individual who is living apart from his or her spouse, and who is unable to file a joint return as a result of domestic abuse, will be permitted to claim a premium tax credit for 2014 while filing a tax return with a filing status of married filing separately” (see an accompanying IRS notice). Treasury also said it anticipates releasing proposed regulations later this spring, reflecting stakeholder input. On March 18, the IRS published a premium subsidy brochure in Spanish, noting the availability of advance payments of the premium tax credit or the ability to claim it later. For the English version, see here.

On March 24, CMS posted slides presenting the April 2014 timeline for making advance premium subsidy and cost-sharing reduction payments (see slide 7).

On April 21, CMS released an FAQ on premium subsidy eligibility upon voluntary disenrollment from COBRA. See here. On April 14, the CBO and JCT said they now project ACA coverage provisions will cost $5 billion less in 2014 and $104 billion less from 2015-2024 than they had estimated in February 2014. The decline primarily stems from the revised estimate that Marketplace premium subsidies will cost $1.032 trillion instead of $1.197 trillion between 2015-2024. On April 9, the House Energy and Commerce Committee released a Congressional Research Service analysis of CCIIO guidance permitting retroactive advance premium tax credits (APTCs) for off-Exchange plans, if consumers experienced “exceptional” enrollment barriers. The report cites case law that would “arguably support a construction of the ACA and IRC that permits APTCs to be retroactively provided for coverage that was not obtained through an Exchange,” although “it would not be unprecedented if this construction were limited to only those taxpayers who were impacted by the technical issues described in the CCIIO Bulletin,” the CRS adds. The CRS also considers the degree of administrative flexibility the Administration may have had, even if courts viewed the statute literally, which would “seem to be incompatible with the provision of APTCs to issuers for coverage that was not provided ‘through’ an Exchange.” On March 31, CCIIO provided guidance on Marketplaces’ options for assuring access to advance premium tax credits (APTCs) and cost-sharing reductions (CSRs) for domestic abuse victims, who, under a March 28 Treasury notice, may claim premium tax credits via a married-filing-separately tax return instead of a joint return.

On April 11, CCIIO released a document outlining the timeline for enrollment data submission and advance premium tax credit and cost-sharing reduction payments to Qualified Health Plans for May through September 2014.

In a May 27, 2014 letter to HHS’s OIG, Sens. McConnell, Hatch and Coburn say the OIG, in report that is statutorily required by July 2014, should address “a growing body of information” suggesting that Marketplace premium subsidies may not be subject to eligibility-related verification.

On May 23, in an updated timeline, CMS outlines Marketplace QHPs’ enrollment and payment data submission and receipt of Treasury payments of advance premium subsidies and cost-sharing reductions between May and September 2014. On May 21, saying HHS lacks income verification procedures in Federal Marketplaces, House Ways and Means Committee Republicans asked the Treasury to stop paying advance premium subsidies to insurers and requested an estimate of amounts that will be subject to recapture via tax returns.

On June 26, 2014, CCIIO released a proposed rule and guidance specifying the avenue for Federally Facilitated Marketplace (FFM) enrollees to remain auto-enrolled in the same plan for the 2015 open enrollment period, with Marketplace notices enabling them to, among other things, “update their information to get a tailored and updated tax credit that keeps up with any income changes.”  State-Based Marketplaces (SBMs) would have the ability to use the approach that FFMs intend to use (elaborated in further in the procedural guidance); existing regulatory procedures for annual redeterminations; or “alternative procedures approved by [HHS]” under specified criteria on which comment is sought. Comments are due by July 28, 2014. In tandem, CCIIO issued draft standard notices for health insurance issuers to use when discontinuing or renewing a product in the small group or individual market (see here) and instructions for using the draft notices (see here). On June 4, amid reports that 2 million Federal Marketplace enrollees have data “inconsistencies” associated with their enrollment, HHS said it is asking consumers to submit additional documentation to substantiate income, citizenship and other aspects underlying Marketplace and subsidy eligibility if reported data did not match existing sources. The agency indicated that it is offering some flexibility beyond the standard 90-day window to provide the information.

On June 19, 2014, HHS released a report finding, among other things, that QHP enrollees through 36 Federally Facilitated Marketplaces (FFMs) who received premium tax credits paid an average of $82 monthly (76% less than the average full premium of $346) across metal levels and $69 monthly for silver plans. On June 16, CMS posted IRS town hall slides discussing  premium subsidies, including eligibility; the potential impact of changes in circumstances; relevant IRS forms providing documentation; and the mechanics of advance subsidy reconciliation. Also see a 1-pager on additional premium subsidy-related resources. On June 10, the House Ways and Means Subcommittees on Oversight and Health held a joint hearing to examine the implementation of the ACA’s income and insurance verification systems. On June 6, CMS released a notice modifying an existing computer matching program with the Social Security Administration (SSA) that facilitates Marketplace eligibility data needs. It said it was revising the estimated number of fiscal year 2014 transactions (for matched CMS-SSA records) from 5.6 million to 11.8 million in the highest month and from 5.6 million to nearly 18.2 million for the year. On May 29,the IRS issued a publication orienting consumers to the changes in circumstances they should report to Marketplaces if they are having advance payments of premium subsidies made to their QHP.

On July 22, two U.S. Court of Appeals panels issued conflicting rulings regarding the legality of offering ACA premium subsidies in Federally Facilitated Marketplaces (FFMs). In King v. Burwell, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia unanimously ruled that the IRS is valid in allowing premium tax credits in both State-Based and FFMs. Judges noted that “the applicable statutory language is ambiguous and subject to multiple interpretations” but found the IRS’ interpretation is “a permissible exercise of the agency’s discretion.” Just hours earlier, in Halbig v. Burwell, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that subsidies are not legal – vacating the IRS’s rule – since the statutory language of the ACA does not explicitly allow enrollees on FFMs to receive them. The White House will ask the full D.C. Court of Appeals to hear the case. On July 16, the House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing to discuss uncertainties behind the ACA’s eligibility system, including application discrepancies. On July 11, CMS posted slides that provide an overview of a recent proposed rule and guidance on Marketplace annual eligibility redeterminations.

On July 24, the IRS released final and temporary rules (with the temporary regulations also being issued as a proposed rule on which comments are due by Oct. 27, 2014) on Marketplace premium tax credits, building on previous guidance that sought to address the circumstances of domestic abuse victims. Specifically, this rule will “allow married victims of domestic abuse or spousal abandonment to claim a premium tax credit without filing a joint return for up to 3 consecutive years.” See a Treasury fact sheet and updated Q&As (#12-13) incorporating the regulations’ provisions. The rule also addresses the indexing of certain components of the premium tax credit computation and advance credit reconciliation issues. On July 24, the IRS released a draft of Form 8962 for reporting on the premium tax credit, including for reconciliation purposes. On July 23, the GAO released a report finding that it was able to obtain subsidized QHP coverage in 11 of 12 instances using “fictitious identifies.” This coincided with a House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee hearing on the “integrity of the ACA’s premium tax credit” (details). On July 17, the IRS posted a You Tube video discussing the reporting of changes of circumstances for purposes of accurate premium tax credit computation. On July 15, the CBO released its long-term budget projections addressing, among other topics, Marketplace premium subsidies. On July 11, HRSA’s HIV/AIDS Bureau published a Policy Clarification seeking public comment on the “feasibility for [Ryan White] grantees and subgrantees to implement a complementary policy that would allow RWHAP grantees and subgrantees to use RWHAP funds to pay the IRS any additional income tax liability a client may owe to the IRS solely based on reconciliation of the premium tax credit.” Comments are due by Aug. 13, 2014.

On August 5, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration posted a July report finding that the IRS was nearly 100% accurate in calculating premium subsidies for the more than 120,824 requests that were processed from October 1-14, 2013, although “TIGTA identified 33 requests for which the IRS incorrectly notified the Exchange that it could not provide tax information for individuals for whom the Exchange was requesting information because the IRS was unable to match the name on the application to IRS data records.” On August 1, following conflicting appellate court rulings in July on premium tax credits in Federally Facilitated Marketplaces, the IRS posted a brief statement on its website saying “it’s important for individuals receiving advance payments of the premium tax credit to know that at this time, nothing has changed and tax credits remain available.” On August 11, the IRS posted a Spanish-language version of a fact sheet on reporting changes in circumstances to Marketplaces as they happen to assure accurate computation of premium tax credits.

On Aug. 12, CMS announced it had sent letters to 310,000 consumers in Federally Facilitated Marketplace (FFM) plans (state-by-state breakdown) who have pending citizenship or immigration “data matching errors,” saying they must submit outstanding documentation by September 5 or their coverage will end on September 30. The agency said the FFM has resolved 450,000 citizenship and immigration status-related application inconsistencies, with an additional 210,000 “in progress,” of 970,000 cases that were outstanding in May 2014; as many as 60,000 documents are being received daily. Providing operational guidance accompanying CMS’s August 12 release, on August 13 CCIIO described end-of-month QHP and subsidy termination for Federal Marketplace enrollees with outstanding data-match issues involving citizenship or immigration status. On Aug. 13, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) wrote a letter to HHS asking about the internal agency process for verifying applications with citizenship and immigration inconsistencies and about the agency’s plans for acting on OIG findings about income-related inconsistencies, as well.

In August 13 slides, CMS outlines September Marketplace payment processing and enrollment reporting and restatement. Also see the certification form (Word document) to accompany the September Enrollment and Payment template (Excel document) submission. The agency also posted a timeline of making interim payments of advance premium subsidies and cost-sharing reductions through October 2014.

On Aug. 19, HHS posted details on submitting documentation to the Federally Facilitated Marketplace to address pending eligibility data-match inconsistencies, such as those involving citizenship, immigration status, veteran status and income.

On August 19, CMS circulated additional resources for assisters and consumers on resolving application inconsistencies, including: slides with tips on resolving data-match or application inconsistency issues and a listing of documents consumers can provide to resolve inconsistencies; and a fact sheet for assisters on data match-driven QHP terminations.

On August 20, CMS sent a final rule, “Annual Eligibility Determinations for Exchange Participation and Insurance Affordability Programs; Health Insurance Issuer Standards,” to OMB for regulatory clearance, which marks a final step before issuance of the regulation. In June 2014, a proposed rule and accompanying guidance had laid out a pathway for auto-enrollment of Federal Marketplace QHP consumers to remain in the same plan for the 2015 benefit year.

On August 26, CMS published a notice requesting comments on an extension of a currently approved information collection (see #4 on pgs. 2-3) regarding the agency’s “Payment Collection Operations Contingency Plan” through which issuers manually report enrollment and payment data to HHS. The agency notes that it will use the data to “make payments or collect charges from issuers under the following programs: Advance payments of the premium tax credit, advanced cost-sharing reductions, and Marketplace user fees,” adding that the agency “will use the information collected to make payments and collect charges in January 2014 and for a number of months thereafter, as may be required based on HHS’s operational progress.” Comments are due by September 25, 2014.

On Sept. 4, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted HHS’s request for en banc, before the full court, review of the Halbig v. Burwell decision. On July 22, a 3-judge panel had ruled 2-1 against the Administration’s ability to provide premium subsidies to individuals enrolled in plans via Federally Facilitated Marketplaces. Oral arguments in the en banc case are slated for Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2014.

On Sept. 8, the IRS released a video on its YouTube page of the agency commissioner discussing premium tax credits and reconciliation, including reporting changes in circumstances.

On Sept. 10, the House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee held a hearing with officials at CMS and the IRS on the status of ACA implementation. Issues focused largely on the upcoming open enrollment period, beginning Nov. 15. During the deliberations, lawmakers expressed concerns regarding the anticipated difficulty of reconciling premium subsidies on tax returns, as well as questioned Exchange functionality for the upcoming open enrollment period.

On Oct. 8, CBO estimated ACA premium subsidies and cost-sharing reductions cost $13 billion in FY14, below the $19 billion forecast in March 2010.

On Oct. 21, in a final step before formal publication in the Federal Register, CCIIO sent the proposed rule on “CY 2016 payment parameters for the cost-sharing reductions, advance payments of the premium tax credit, reinsurance, and risk adjustment programs as required by the Affordable Care Act” to OMB for final approval.

On Oct. 23, the IRS released a consumer “tax tip” that highlighted reporting changes in circumstances to assure accurate receipt of advance premium tax credit and minimize reconciliation.

On Oct. 28, the IRS released several consumer-focused resources in Spanish that address, among other topics, the premium tax credit and individual mandate.

On Nov. 12, acknowledging the Supreme Court’s decision to review the King v. Burwell case on subsidies’ availability through Federally Facilitated Marketplaces, the IRS posted a statement on its website indicating that “at this time, nothing has changed and tax credits remain available.” On Nov. 10, the CBO released a fiscal year (FY) 2014 budget summary noting that premium subsidies delivered through Marketplaces totaled $13 billion for FY14.

On Jan. 20, 2015, CCIIO presented operationally focused slides on cost-sharing reductions and advance premium tax credit calculations in the context of passive Marketplace reenrollment.

On Jan. 23, 2015, Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) wrote a letter to the IRS on its selection of CGI Federal, lead Healthcare.gov contractor, to assist with ACA implementation activities under its purview. On Jan. 27, 2015, the IRS issued a notice providing “limited penalty relief for taxpayers who have a balance due on their 2014 income tax return as a result of reconciling advance payments of the premium tax credit against the premium tax credit allowed on the tax return.” Specifically, it provides forgiveness for penalties for late payments and the underpayment of estimated taxes.

On Jan. 27, 2015, the IRS posted a chart with guidance to consumers on filing 2014 taxes and assuring compliance with ACA requirements, including premium subsidy reconciliation and the individual mandate.

On Jan. 28, HHS announced that it is collaborating with non-profit organizations and certain large tax preparers to help consumers understand how the ACA impacts their taxes.

On Feb. 9, HHS released a report finding that 87% of individuals that enrolled through Healthcare.gov qualified for financial assistance and eight out of 10 users could choose a plan with a premium of $100 or less after tax credits. On Jan. 28, Senate Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT) sent a letter to the IRS asking about the agency’s plans to waive certain repayment obligations associated with advance premium tax credit payments.

On Feb. 20, CMS announced that 800,000 Marketplace 1095-A Forms sent to Healthcare.gov consumers were affected by an error in the benchmark premium calculation. In a Feb. 23 letter to the Administration, Sen. Hatch (R-UT) requested specific details about the incorrect forms. On Feb. 24, according to reports, a Treasury official indicated that about 50,000 taxpayers who had already filed returns relying on erroneous 1095-As would not have to repay any resulting underpayments.

On Feb. 27, HHS Secretary Burwell testified at a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on the agency’s proposed fiscal year 2016 budget and reiterated there is no contingency plan if the Supreme Court invalidates premium subsidies’ availability through Federally Facilitated Marketplaces (FFMs).

On Mar. 4, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments (transcript) in King v. Burwell regarding the legality of premium subsidies via FFMs.

On Mar. 9, CBO released updated projections in which it said ACA coverage provisions’ net cost would be $1.207 trillion from 2016-2025, reflecting a $142 billion (11%) decrease from the January 2015 figures. It cited a “downward revision in the projection of health insurance premiums” driving lower Exchange subsidy projections, among other factors, and revised its estimate of 2015 average Marketplace enrollment to 11 million from 12 million.

On Mar. 20, CMS and Treasury said those who filed their taxes based on an incorrect 1095-A form will not have to re-file an amended tax return. CMS also said the “vast majority” now have access to a corrected 1095-A.

In a Mar. 23 report, GAO finds ACA premium tax credits “likely contributed to an expansion of health insurance coverage in 2014 because it significantly reduced the cost of exchange plans’ premiums for those eligible.”

On Mar. 31, HHS’ OIG released a report finding that Treasury and HHS took “significant steps in planning the shared roles and responsibilities for advance premium tax credit payments.” On Apr. 2, the IRS highlighted tax-related resources available on irs.gov/aca, including publications addressing the premium tax credit. On Apr. 22, the IRS updated its Q&A document for individuals who received incorrect insurance information for tax purposes, including some circumstances where filing an amended return based on a corrected 1095-A could be advantageous.

On May 8, the IRS posted an archived edition of a recent webinar addressing the individual mandate and premium tax credit.

On June 4, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts held a hearing on King v. Burwell.

On June 10, the House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing with HHS Secretary Burwell, with significant discussion of King v. Burwell scenarios.

On June 25, in a 6-3 decision in King v. Burwell, the Supreme Court upheld the legality of providing premium subsidies through Healthcare.gov

On July 17, CMS released an update (also: IRS “tax tip”) on the importance of filing taxes to reconcile premium subsidies. It noted that those who do not – and are receiving subsidies – will lose subsidy eligibility for 2016 coverage.

On July 20, Senate Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT) wrote (PDF) to the IRS to express concern about the integrity of premium subsidy payments and requested an examination of a large sample of individuals who received a subsidy yet failed to submit a tax return.

On July 23, the IRS released a “tax tip” recommending that consumers receiving premium subsidies report changes in circumstances that may affect subsidy accuracy.

On July 29, GAO released a report urging IRS to strengthen oversight of premium subsidy and individual mandate penalty compliance.

2016

On Jan. 8, 2016, the IRS updated Congress on the status of premium tax credits and individual mandate penalties during the 2015 tax filing season (as of October 2015). The agency noted that about 7.9 million reported a total of $1.6 billion in individual mandate penalties averaging $210. About 12.4 million claimed one or more exemptions.

On Jan. 21, 2016, HHS released a report on the average amount of monthly advance premium tax credits in Healthcare.gov states between Nov. 1, 2015 and Dec. 26, 2015.

In May 2016, CMS posted additional details on outreach to employers regarding employees enrolled in QHPs with premium subsidies, including an employer verification study slated to occur through June 2016.

On June 28, CMS posted slides that provide QHPs with an overview of federal efforts to recheck that consumers receiving advance premium tax credits filed a tax return and reconciled the amount of the credit to their income.

On June 30, CMS highlighted key dates for September 2016 as part of its efforts to transition to making policy-based payments (PBPs) to QHP issuers. The PBP payment process automates the monthly enrollment reporting that underlies issuers’ receipt or advanced payments of Marketplace financial assistance.

On July 8, the IRS published a proposed rule on the premium tax credit and individual mandate. The IRS explains that it “address[es] various issues regarding: (1) eligibility for the premium tax credit (including how opt-out arrangements affect an employee’s required contribution); (2) the due date for payment of premiums in the case of retroactive enrollments; (3) the premium assistance amount when certain coverage is terminated mid-month; (4) the benchmark plan premium (including how pediatric dental benefits affect the benchmark plan premium); (5) the reconciliation of advance payments for an individual whom no one claims as a dependent; and (6) certain information reporting rules [applicable to Exchanges].” Comments are due by Sept. 6, 2016.

In an Oct. 24 letter to CMS, House Energy & Commerce Committee GOP leaders criticize the Administration’s claims of premium affordability under the ACA, indicating that taxpayers are essentially “subsidizing the growing cost of health care insurance” through tax credits.

On Oct. 26, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) released a white paper calling into question the administration’s income eligibility verification process, used to determine eligibility for subsidies, in the ACA Marketplace.

2017

On Mar. 24, CMS issued a bulletin on 2017 updated federal poverty level (FPL) guidelines, which are used in premium tax credit and cost-sharing reduction eligibility, among other applications.

On April 13, CMS issued its final rule on stability in the individual and small group insurance markets. The agency largely finalizes its proposals on abridging the 2018 open enrollment period, deferring to states on network adequacy, and widening issuers’ flexibility on actuarial value (AV) via the de minimus variation allowance. The agency also posted several subregulatory guidances, including guidance that cites the Administration’s ACA Executive Order in deferring to states on specified aspects of QHP certification and an FAQ on its approach to assessing compliance for issuers participating in the FFMs.

In May 8 slides, CMS highlighted key aspects of its Marketplace stabilization final rule, including guaranteed availability, special enrollment period verification, open enrollment policies.

On June 8, HHS issued a Request for Information (RFI) seeking comments on approaches the agency could take to reduce regulatory burdens in the individual and small group markets and saying the agency is “actively working” to further that goal under Title I of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

2017

On July 12, the House Democrats’ Affordable and Accessible Health Care Task Force released a plan to stabilize the individual market.

On July 24, the IRS finalized a rule providing relief from the premium tax credit’s joint filing requirement for married individuals who experience domestic abuse or spousal abandonment.

On Sept. 14, CBO released a report examining federal subsidies for health insurance for those under age 65.

Statutory Text

 
Implementation Status 
Summary 

SEC. 1401. REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT PROVIDING PREMIUM ASSISTANCE
FOR COVERAGE UNDER A QUALIFIED HEALTH
PLAN.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart C of part IV of subchapter A of
chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to refundable
credits) is amended by inserting after section 36A the following
new section:
‘‘SEC. 36B. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR COVERAGE UNDER A QUALIFIED
HEALTH PLAN.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an applicable taxpayer, there
shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle
for any taxable year an amount equal to the premium assistance
credit amount of the taxpayer for the taxable year.
‘‘(b) PREMIUM ASSISTANCE CREDIT AMOUNT.—For purposes of
this section—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘premium assistance credit
amount’ means, with respect to any taxable year, the sum of
the premium assistance amounts determined under paragraph
(2) with respect to all coverage months of the taxpayer occurring
during the taxable year.
‘‘(2) PREMIUM ASSISTANCE AMOUNT.—The premium assistance
amount determined under this subsection with respect to
any coverage month is the amount equal to the lesser of—
‘‘(A) the monthly premiums for such month for 1 or
more qualified health plans offered in the individual market
within a State which cover the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s
spouse, or any dependent (as defined in section
152) of the taxpayer and which were enrolled in through
an Exchange established by the State under 1311 of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or
‘‘(B) the excess (if any) of—
‘‘(i) the adjusted monthly premium for such month
for the applicable second lowest cost silver plan with
respect to the taxpayer, over
‘‘(ii) an amount equal to 1/12 of the product of the
applicable percentage and the taxpayer’s household income
for the taxable year.
‘‘(3) OTHER TERMS AND RULES RELATING TO PREMIUM AS- SISTANCE AMOUNTS.—For purposes of paragraph (2)—
‘‘(A) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—[As revised by section
1001(a)(1)(A) of HCERA] Except as provided in clause
(ii), the applicable percentage for any taxable year shall be the percentage such that the applicable percentage
for any taxpayer whose household income is
within an income tier specified in the following table
shall increase, on a sliding scale in a linear manner,
from the initial premium percentage to the final premium
percentage specified in such table for such income
tier:
‘‘In the case of household income (expressed
as a percent of poverty line)
within the following income tier:
The initial premium percentage
is—
The final premium percentage
is—
Up to 133% 2.0% 2.0%
133% up to 150% 3.0% 4.0%
150% up to 200% 4.0% 6.3%
200% up to 250% 6.3% 8.05%
250% up to 300% 8.05% 9.5%
300% up to 400% 9.5% 9.5%
‘‘(ii) INDEXING.—[As added by section
1001(a)(1)(B) of HCERA instead of clauses (ii) and (iii)
previously here]
‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subclause (II), in
the case of taxable years beginning in any calendar
year after 2014, the initial and final applicable
percentages under clause (i) (as in effect for
the preceding calendar year after application of
this clause) shall be adjusted to reflect the excess
of the rate of premium growth for the preceding
calendar year over the rate of income growth for
the preceding calendar year.
‘‘(II) ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT.—Except as
provided in subclause (III), in the case of any calendar
year after 2018, the percentages described
in subclause (I) shall, in addition to the adjustment
under subclause (I), be adjusted to reflect
the excess (if any) of the rate of premium growth
estimated under subclause (I) for the preceding
calendar year over the rate of growth in the consumer
price index for the preceding calendar year.
‘‘(III) FAILSAFE.—Subclause (II) shall apply for
any calendar year only if the aggregate amount of
premium tax credits under this section and costsharing
reductions under section 1402 of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act for the
preceding calendar year exceeds an amount equal
to 0.504 percent of the gross domestic product for
the preceding calendar year.
‘‘(B) APPLICABLE SECOND LOWEST COST SILVER PLAN.—
The applicable second lowest cost silver plan with respect
to any applicable taxpayer is the second lowest cost silver
plan of the individual market in the rating area in which
the taxpayer resides which—
‘‘(i) is offered through the same Exchange through
which the qualified health plans taken into account
under paragraph (2)(A) were offered, and
‘‘(ii) provides—
‘‘(I) self-only coverage in the case of an applicable
taxpayer—
‘‘(aa) whose tax for the taxable year is determined
under section 1(c) (relating to unmarried
individuals other than surviving
spouses and heads of households) and who is
not allowed a deduction under section 151 for
the taxable year with respect to a dependent,
or
‘‘(bb) who is not described in item (aa) but
who purchases only self-only coverage, and
‘‘(II) family coverage in the case of any other
applicable taxpayer.
If a taxpayer files a joint return and no credit is allowed
under this section with respect to 1 of the spouses by reason
of subsection (e), the taxpayer shall be treated as described
in clause (ii)(I) unless a deduction is allowed under
section 151 for the taxable year with respect to a dependent
other than either spouse and subsection (e) does not
apply to the dependent.
‘‘(C) ADJUSTED MONTHLY PREMIUM.—The adjusted
monthly premium for an applicable second lowest cost silver
plan is the monthly premium which would have been
charged (for the rating area with respect to which the premiums
under paragraph (2)(A) were determined) for the
plan if each individual covered under a qualified health
plan taken into account under paragraph (2)(A) were covered
by such silver plan and the premium was adjusted
only for the age of each such individual in the manner allowed
under section 2701 of the Public Health Service Act.
In the case of a State participating in the wellness discount
demonstration project under section 2705(d) of the
Public Health Service Act, the adjusted monthly premium
shall be determined without regard to any premium discount
or rebate under such project.
‘‘(D) ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.—If—
‘‘(i) a qualified health plan under section
1302(b)(5) of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act offers benefits in addition to the essential
health benefits required to be provided by the plan, or
‘‘(ii) a State requires a qualified health plan under
section 1311(d)(3)(B) of such Act to cover benefits in
addition to the essential health benefits required to be
provided by the plan,
the portion of the premium for the plan properly allocable
(under rules prescribed by the Secretary of Health and
Human Services) to such additional benefits shall not be
taken into account in determining either the monthly premium
or the adjusted monthly premium under paragraph
(2).
‘‘(E) SPECIAL RULE FOR PEDIATRIC DENTAL COVERAGE.— For purposes of determining the amount of any monthly
premium, if an individual enrolls in both a qualified health
plan and a plan described in section 1311(d)(2)(B)(ii)(I) of
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act for any
plan year, the portion of the premium for the plan described
in such section that (under regulations prescribed
by the Secretary) is properly allocable to pediatric dental
benefits which are included in the essential health benefits
required to be provided by a qualified health plan under
section 1302(b)(1)(J) of such Act shall be treated as a premium
payable for a qualified health plan.
‘‘(c) DEFINITION AND RULES RELATING TO APPLICABLE TAX- PAYERS, COVERAGE MONTHS, AND QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN.—For
purposes of this section—
‘‘(1) APPLICABLE TAXPAYER.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—[As revised by section 10105(b)]
The term ‘applicable taxpayer’ means, with respect to any
taxable year, a taxpayer whose household income for the
taxable year equals or exceeds 100 percent but does not exceed
400 percent of an amount equal to the poverty line for
a family of the size involved.
‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS LAW- FULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES.—If—
‘‘(i) a taxpayer has a household income which is
not greater than 100 percent of an amount equal to
the poverty line for a family of the size involved, and
‘‘(ii) the taxpayer is an alien lawfully present in
the United States, but is not eligible for the Medicaid
program under title XIX of the Social Security Act by
reason of such alien status,
the taxpayer shall, for purposes of the credit under this
section, be treated as an applicable taxpayer with a household
income which is equal to 100 percent of the poverty
line for a family of the size involved.
‘‘(C) MARRIED COUPLES MUST FILE JOINT RETURN.—If
the taxpayer is married (within the meaning of section
7703) at the close of the taxable year, the taxpayer shall
be treated as an applicable taxpayer only if the taxpayer
and the taxpayer’s spouse file a joint return for the taxable
year.
‘‘(D) DENIAL OF CREDIT TO DEPENDENTS.—No credit
shall be allowed under this section to any individual with
respect to whom a deduction under section 151 is allowable
to another taxpayer for a taxable year beginning in
the calendar year in which such individual’s taxable year
begins.
‘‘(2) COVERAGE MONTH.—For purposes of this subsection—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘coverage month’ means,
with respect to an applicable taxpayer, any month if—
‘‘(i) as of the first day of such month the taxpayer,
the taxpayer’s spouse, or any dependent of the taxpayer
is covered by a qualified health plan described
in subsection (b)(2)(A) that was enrolled in through an
Exchange established by the State under section 1311
of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and
‘‘(ii) the premium for coverage under such plan for
such month is paid by the taxpayer (or through advance
payment of the credit under subsection (a)
under section 1412 of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act).
‘‘(B) EXCEPTION FOR MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.— ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘coverage month’ shall
not include any month with respect to an individual if
for such month the individual is eligible for minimum
essential coverage other than eligibility for coverage
described in section 5000A(f)(1)(C) (relating to coverage
in the individual market).
‘‘(ii) MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.—The term
‘minimum essential coverage’ has the meaning given
such term by section 5000A(f).
‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR EMPLOYER-SPONSORED MINIMUM
ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.—For purposes of subparagraph
(B)—
‘‘(i) COVERAGE MUST BE AFFORDABLE.—Except as
provided in clause (iii), an employee shall not be treated
as eligible for minimum essential coverage if such
coverage—
‘‘(I) consists of an eligible employer-sponsored
plan (as defined in section 5000A(f)(2)), and
‘‘(II) the employee’s required contribution
(within the meaning of section 5000A(e)(1)(B))
with respect to the plan exceeds 9.5 percent of the
applicable taxpayer’s household income. [As revised
by section 1001(a)(2)(A) of HCERA]
This clause shall also apply to an individual who is eligible
to enroll in the plan by reason of a relationship
the individual bears to the employee.
‘‘(ii) COVERAGE MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM VALUE.—
Except as provided in clause (iii), an employee shall
not be treated as eligible for minimum essential coverage
if such coverage consists of an eligible employer-sponsored
plan (as defined in section 5000A(f)(2)) and
the plan’s share of the total allowed costs of benefits
provided under the plan is less than 60 percent of
such costs.
‘‘(iii) EMPLOYEE OR FAMILY MUST NOT BE COVERED
UNDER EMPLOYER PLAN.—Clauses (i) and (ii) shall not
apply if the employee (or any individual described in
the last sentence of clause (i)) is covered under the eligible
employer-sponsored plan or the grandfathered
health plan.
‘‘(iv) INDEXING.—[As revised by section 10105(c)
and sections 1001(a)(2)(A) and (B) of HCERA] In the
case of plan years beginning in any calendar year after
2014, the Secretary shall adjust the 9.5 percent under
clause (i)(II) in the same manner as the percentages
are adjusted under subsection (b)(3)(A)(ii)
‘‘(D) EXCEPTION FOR INDIVIDUAL RECEIVING FREE
CHOICE VOUCHERS.—[As added by section 10107(h)(1), effective
for taxable year beginning after December 31, 2013]
The term ‘coverage month’ shall not include any month in
which such individual has a free choice voucher provided
under section 10108 of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act.
‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS AND OTHER RULES.— ‘‘(A) QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN.—The term ‘qualified
health plan’ has the meaning given such term by section
1301(a) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
except that such term shall not include a qualified health
plan which is a catastrophic plan described in section
1302(e) of such Act.
‘‘(B) GRANDFATHERED HEALTH PLAN.—The term ‘grandfathered
health plan’ has the meaning given such term by
section 1251 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act.
‘‘(d) TERMS RELATING TO INCOME AND FAMILIES.—For purposes
of this section—
‘‘(1) FAMILY SIZE.—The family size involved with respect to
any taxpayer shall be equal to the number of individuals for
whom the taxpayer is allowed a deduction under section 151
(relating to allowance of deduction for personal exemptions) for
the taxable year.
‘‘(2) HOUSEHOLD INCOME.—
‘‘(A) HOUSEHOLD INCOME.—The term ‘household income’
means, with respect to any taxpayer, an amount
equal to the sum of—[Clauses (i) and (ii) revised by section
1004(a)(1)(A) of HCERA]
‘‘(i) the modified adjusted gross income of the taxpayer,
plus
‘‘(ii) the aggregate modified adjusted gross incomes
of all other individuals who—
‘‘(I) were taken into account in determining
the taxpayer’s family size under paragraph (1),
and
‘‘(II) were required to file a return of tax imposed
by section 1 for the taxable year.
‘‘(B) MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.—[Replaced
by section 1004(a)(2) of HCERA] The term ‘modified adjusted
gross income’ means adjusted gross income increased
by—
‘‘(i) any amount excluded from gross income under
section 911, and
‘‘(ii) any amount of interest received or accrued by
the taxpayer during the taxable year which is exempt
from tax.
‘‘(3) POVERTY LINE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘poverty line’ has the
meaning given that term in section 2110(c)(5) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397jj(c)(5)).
‘‘(B) POVERTY LINE USED.—In the case of any qualified
health plan offered through an Exchange for coverage during
a taxable year beginning in a calendar year, the poverty
line used shall be the most recently published poverty
line as of the 1st day of the regular enrollment period for
coverage during such calendar year.
‘‘(e) RULES FOR INDIVIDUALS NOT LAWFULLY PRESENT.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If 1 or more individuals for whom a taxpayer
is allowed a deduction under section 151 (relating to allowance
of deduction for personal exemptions) for the taxable
year (including the taxpayer or his spouse) are individuals who
are not lawfully present—
‘‘(A) the aggregate amount of premiums otherwise
taken into account under clauses (i) and (ii) of subsection
(b)(2)(A) shall be reduced by the portion (if any) of such
premiums which is attributable to such individuals, and
‘‘(B) for purposes of applying this section, the determination
as to what percentage a taxpayer’s household income
bears to the poverty level for a family of the size involved
shall be made under one of the following methods:
‘‘(i) A method under which—
‘‘(I) the taxpayer’s family size is determined
by not taking such individuals into account, and
‘‘(II) the taxpayer’s household income is equal
to the product of the taxpayer’s household income
(determined without regard to this subsection)
and a fraction—
‘‘(aa) the numerator of which is the poverty
line for the taxpayer’s family size determined
after application of subclause (I), and
‘‘(bb) the denominator of which is the poverty
line for the taxpayer’s family size determined
without regard to subclause (I).
‘‘(ii) A comparable method reaching the same result
as the method under clause (i).
‘‘(2) LAWFULLY PRESENT.—For purposes of this section, an
individual shall be treated as lawfully present only if the individual
is, and is reasonably expected to be for the entire period
of enrollment for which the credit under this section is being
claimed, a citizen or national of the United States or an alien
lawfully present in the United States.
‘‘(3) SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Health
and Human Services, in consultation with the Secretary, shall
prescribe rules setting forth the methods by which calculations
of family size and household income are made for purposes of
this subsection. Such rules shall be designed to ensure that the
least burden is placed on individuals enrolling in qualified
health plans through an Exchange and taxpayers eligible for
the credit allowable under this section.
‘‘(f) RECONCILIATION OF CREDIT AND ADVANCE CREDIT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The amount of the credit allowed under
this section for any taxable year shall be reduced (but not
below zero) by the amount of any advance payment of such
credit under section 1412 of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act.
‘‘(2) EXCESS ADVANCE PAYMENTS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If the advance payments to a taxpayer
under section 1412 of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act for a taxable year exceed the credit allowed
by this section (determined without regard to paragraph
(1)), the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable
year shall be increased by the amount of such excess.
‘‘(B) LIMITATION ON INCREASE WHERE INCOME LESS
THAN 400 PERCENT OF POVERTY LINE.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an applicable taxpayer
whose household income is less than 400 percent
of the poverty line for the size of the family involved
for the taxable year, the amount of the increase
under subparagraph (A) shall in no event exceed $400
($250 in the case of a taxpayer whose tax is determined
under section 1(c) for the taxable year).
‘‘(ii) INDEXING OF AMOUNT.—In the case of any calendar
year beginning after 2014, each of the dollar
amounts under clause (i) shall be increased by an
amount equal to—
‘‘(I) such dollar amount, multiplied by
‘‘(II) the cost-of-living adjustment determined
under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year, determined
by substituting ‘calendar year 2013’ for ‘calendar
year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof.
‘‘(3) INFORMATION REQUIREMENT.—[As revised by section
1004(c) of HCERA] Each Exchange (or any person carrying out
1 or more responsibilities of an Exchange under section
1311(f)(3) or 1321(c) of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act) shall provide the following information to the Secretary
and to the taxpayer with respect to any health plan provided
through the Exchange:
‘‘(A) The level of coverage described in section 1302(d)
of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the
period such coverage was in effect.
‘‘(B) The total premium for the coverage without regard
to the credit under this section or cost-sharing reductions
under section 1402 of such Act.
‘‘(C) The aggregate amount of any advance payment of
such credit or reductions under section 1412 of such Act.
‘‘(D) The name, address, and TIN of the primary insured
and the name and TIN of each other individual obtaining
coverage under the policy.
‘‘(E) Any information provided to the Exchange, including
any change of circumstances, necessary to determine
eligibility for, and the amount of, such credit.
‘‘(F) Information necessary to determine whether a
taxpayer has received excess advance payments.
If the amount of any increase under clause (i) is not
a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to
the next lowest multiple of $50.
‘‘(g) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations
as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section,
including regulations which provide for—
‘‘(1) the coordination of the credit allowed under this section
with the program for advance payment of the credit under
section 1412 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
and
‘‘(2) the application of subsection (f) where the filing status
of the taxpayer for a taxable year is different from such status
used for determining the advance payment of the credit.’’.
(b) DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION.—Section 280C of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following
new subsection:
‘‘(g) CREDIT FOR HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS.—No deduction
shall be allowed for the portion of the premiums paid by the taxpayer
for coverage of 1 or more individuals under a qualified health
plan which is equal to the amount of the credit determined for the
taxable year under section 36B(a) with respect to such premiums.’’.
(c) STUDY ON AFFORDABLE COVERAGE.— (1) STUDY AND REPORT.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 5 years after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall
conduct a study on the affordability of health insurance
coverage, including—
(i) the impact of the tax credit for qualified health
insurance coverage of individuals under section 36B of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the tax credit
for employee health insurance expenses of small employers
under section 45R of such Code on maintaining
and expanding the health insurance coverage of individuals;

(ii) the availability of affordable health benefits
plans, including a study of whether the percentage of
household income used for purposes of section
36B(c)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as
added by this section) is the appropriate level for determining
whether employer-provided coverage is affordable
for an employee and whether such level may
be lowered without significantly increasing the costs to
the Federal Government and reducing employer-provided
coverage; and
(iii) the ability of individuals to maintain essential
health benefits coverage (as defined in section
5000A(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
(B) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit to
the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the
study conducted under subparagraph (A), together with
legislative recommendations relating to the matters studied
under such subparagraph.
(2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—In this subsection,
the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means
the Committee on Ways and Means, the Committee on Education
and Labor, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce
of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Finance and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and
Pensions of the Senate.
(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(1) Paragraph (2) of section 1324(b) of title 31, United
States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘36B,’’ after ‘‘36A,’’.
(2) The table of sections for subpart C of part IV of subchapter
A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 36A
the following new item:
‘‘Sec. 36B. Refundable credit for coverage under a qualified health plan.’’.
(3) [As revised by section 10105(d)] Section 6211(b)(4)(A)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting
‘‘36B,’’ after ‘‘36A,’’.
(e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section
shall apply to taxable years ending after December 31, 2013.

Browse ACA Titles

  • I-Quality, Affordable Health Care for all Americans
  • II-Role of Public Programs
  • III-Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Health Care
  • IV-Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving Public Health
  • V-Health Care Workforce
  • VI-Transparency and Program Integrity
  • VII-Improving Access to Innovative Medical Therapies
  • VIII-Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS ACT)
  • IX-Revenue Provisions

ABOUT

  • Home
  • About Policy Hub
  • Free Newsletter
  • Team
  • Mission and Values
  • Contact Us

Contact Us

Impact Health Policy Partners 1301 K Street, NW, Suite 300W
Washington, D.C. 20005

(202) 309-0796
Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 ‐ Impact Health Policy Partners ‐ All Rights Reserved ‐ Privacy Policy ‐ Terms and Conditions ‐ Log in