My Policy Hub

Improving health is our policy

  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact

ACA Now

1501 - Requirement to Maintain Minimum Essential Coverage

 
Implementation Status 
Statutory Text 

Summary

Amended by section 10106 of the Senate Manager’s Amendment and 1002 of HCERA. Effective January 1, 2014, mandates that all individuals with access to affordable coverage purchase minimum essential coverage or pay a penalty. The penalty phases up as follows:

  • 2014: $95 or 1% of income (whichever is greater)
  • 2015: $325 or 2% of income
  • 2016: $695 or 2.5% of income (up to a cap of the premium for a Bronze plan)
  • After 2016: caps adjusted by increases in cost of living

Exceptions are made for individuals not lawfully present in the U.S., religious objectors and incarcerated individuals. Additional exemptions are allowed for taxpayers with income below the filing threshold, members of Indian tribes, those granted a hardship waiver and individuals who were not covered for less than three months of the year.

Implementation Status

 
Summary 
Statutory Text 

On February 25, 2011, GAO issued a report to Senator Ben Nelson regarding potential alternatives to the individual mandate in encouraging enrollment in insurance coverage programs.

2012

On January 28, 2012, the Supreme Court issued its decision upholding the individual mandate as a constitutional use of Congress’s taxing power.

On September 19, 2012, CBO issued a report estimating the number of Americans who may pay the minimum essential coverage penalty.

2013

On January 30, 2013, the IRS issued a Proposed Rule governing implementation of this individual mandate provision, including collection of penalties for non-compliance. Comments are due May 2 and a public hearing is scheduled for May 29 at 10am. Also on January 30, the Agency posted an FAQ regarding the mandate.

On June 26, HHS issued a final rule implementing certain ACA provisions pertaining to the shared responsibility provision, which calls for individuals to maintain “minimum essential coverage.”  The final rule also delineates the process by which an individual may qualify for an exemption to the application of this requirement or how to comply with the associated tax penalty for purposes of federal filing.

Also on June 26, the IRS released a Notice  providing transition relief from shared responsibility payments for “specified individuals who are eligible to enroll in certain eligible employer-sponsored health plans with a plan year other than a calendar year (non-calendar year plans) if the plan year begins in 2013 and ends in 2014.”

Additionally, CCIIO on June 26 released guidance on hardship exemption criteria and special enrollment periods that Federally Facilitated Marketplaces will use; State-Based Marketplaces may use the criteria or develop their own within regulatory parameters.

On June 26, the IRS issued a Notice, “Eligibility for Minimum Essential Coverage for Purposes of the Premium Tax Credit,” providing guidance on “whether or when, for purposes of the premium tax credit under § 36B of the Internal Revenue Code, an individual is eligible for minimum essential coverage under certain government-sponsored health programs or other coverage designated as minimum essential coverage,” such as Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, TRICARE, student health or state high risk pool programs.

On July 15, the IRS released a Notice providing “relief from the § 5000A shared responsibility payment for specified individuals who are eligible to enroll in certain eligible employer-sponsored health plans with a plan year other than a calendar year (non-calendar year plans) if the plan year begins in 2013 and ends in 2014.”

On July 11, CMS released a Paperwork Reduction Act package containing a supporting statement and certification-related documentation for sponsors seeking to have their coverage recognized, under a pathway laid out in a recent final rule, as minimum essential coverage.

On August 30, 2013, the IRS published final regulations in the Federal Register regarding ACA’s shared responsibility payment (i.e., the individual mandate penalty) for not maintaining minimum essential coverage (MEC), which applies to taxable years ending after December 31, 2013. The IRS says the regulations “largely finalize the rules in the notice of proposed rulemaking” published February 1, 2013; they address, for example, exempt individuals, Medicaid premium assistance and section 1115 waivers vis a vis MEC, liability for individual mandate penalties for dependents and the one-day rule,” under which individuals are considered to have MEC for any calendar month if they are “enrolled in and entitled to receive benefits under a program or plan that is [MEC] for at least one day during the month.” Also see updated FAQs on the individual shared responsibility requirements.

In September, CMS posted a fact sheet providing an overview of exemptions from the individual mandate.

On September 9, following the one-year delay of employer mandate enforcement and associated information reporting requirements, the IRS published a proposed rule on information reporting for applicable large employers under section 6056 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) relating to employers’ offers of health insurance coverage and employee statements used in premium tax credit administration, among other requirements, as well as a proposed rule on information reporting for those offering minimum essential coverage. A Treasury Department fact sheet included farther below provides an overview of select provisions of both rules, including specific proposals the Department says present a “variety of options to potentially reduce or streamline information reporting.” The IRS proposes that these information requirements take effect for calendar years (CYs) beginning after December 31, 2014 (i.e., in CY 2015)—affirming previously issued transition relief; voluntary compliance is encouraged for 2014. Comments are due on November 8.

On September 30, CMS released a fact sheet on exemptions from individual mandate penalties and routes for applying for exemptions, including through Marketplaces.

On October 9, Sarah Hall Ingram, director of the IRS’s ACA Office, testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on implementation of premium subsidies and enforcement of the individual mandate. She said “systems and processes the IRS has developed to support enrollment in the Marketplaces were launched on schedule and are working as planned.” See the hearing page for video.

On October 22, CMS submitted a newly proposed information collection for OMB review relating to the individual mandate exemption for members of healthcare sharing ministries. The agency notes that 4 organizations have indicated their status as such ministries. Comments are due by November 21.

On October 16, CMS submitted for OMB approval the application for Health Insurance Marketplaces’ use in determining eligibility for and granting certificates of exemption from the individual shared responsibility payment. Also see a Paperwork Reduction Act Package including accompanying documentation (including “seven appendices of application materials to illustrate the process applicants will use to apply for exemptions). Comments are due by November 15.

On October 28, CCIIO released a Q&A explaining that it is creating a new hardship exemption from the individual shared responsibility payment – administered through 2015 tax filings – that would apply to those enrolling in Marketplace coverage before the end of the initial open enrollment period. This obviates a scenario in which those enrolling on or after February 16, 2014, could have incurred the penalty because coverage effective dates would have been on April 1 or later—beyond the three-month short coverage gap exemption.

On Oct. 31, in subregulatory guidance, CCIIO outlines a process by which coverage types not recognized as minimum essential coverage (MEC) in the ACA or its implementing regulations can apply for such recognition, adding “such plans or policies must meet substantially all of the requirements of the provisions of Title I of the Affordable Care Act that apply to non-grandfathered health plans in the individual market.” Also see a fact sheet on MEC provisions and newly released MEC Application Form (Excel) and Certification Statement.

On Dec. 19, 2013 HHS announced that it is offering a hardship exemption to the individual mandate for policyholders with canceled plans who “consider the other plans available unaffordable” (see #13 here), a move that will give them access to catastrophic plans through Marketplaces. Secretary Sebelius made the announcement in a letter responding to Sens. Mark Warner (D-VA), Angus King (I-ME) Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) and Tim Kaine (D-VA), who released a statement posting the Secretary’s letter here. Also see accompanying guidance from CCIIO that documents the steps needed to secure the exemption and catastrophic coverage. Secretary Sebelius also indicated HHS would establish a dedicated hotline on the topic.

2014

On Jan. 23, 2014 the IRS issued a proposed rule that would codify guidance in the preamble of the IRS’s August 2013 final rule regarding the ACA’s individual mandate penalty for not maintaining minimum essential coverage (MEC). The IRS clarifies coverage under certain government-sponsored programs that the IRS does not consider to constitute government-sponsored MEC.

In accompanying Notice 2013-42, the IRS indicates that, due to the fact that individuals receiving limited-benefit government health programs (e.g., individuals with medically needy coverage or that were receiving benefits as part of an expansion population authorized under section 1115(a)(2)) may not have been aware at the time of open enrollment that their coverage was not deemed to be MEC pursuant to the ACA, the IRS “provides transition relief from the shared responsibility payment for months in 2014 in which individuals have certain Medicaid coverage or limited-benefit coverage” (i.e., exemptions from the individual mandate penalty). Also see updated individual mandate FAQs reflecting these changes.

On Feb. 25, as part of a consumer-oriented “Tax Tip” series, the IRS released background information on the individual mandate penalty (here) and how changes in circumstances affect premium subsidies (here), among other topics.

On Feb. 10, Republican Sens. Coburn, Alexander, Barrasso, Cornyn and others asked (press release) the IRS to explain its approach to individual mandate enforcement, including whether those who “completed all the steps to purchase health insurance, but were not enrolled due to a website error” will be subject to penalties, among other issues. They also cite a Congressional Research Service report indicating the IRS could “present its claim when property is being sold and collect both the original penalty amount along with accrued interest and applicable penalties” and inquire about any IRS intent to employ this approach.

On March 13, at a House Ways and Means Committee hearing on the HHS budget, Secretary Sebelius said there would be no further delays to significant provisions of the ACA, specifically with respect to the individual mandate and the March 31 end-date to the program’s inaugural 6-month enrollment period.

On March 5, the IRS finalized “streamlined” ACA reporting requirements for employers and insurers (see here and here) pursuant to sections 6055 and 6056 of the Internal Revenue Code. Among other provisions, the IRS indicates that self-insured employers will be able to meet the ACA reporting obligations via a single, consolidated form for purposes of reporting information pertaining to sections 6055 and 6056.

On March 25, complementing its regularly updated Q&As on the topic, the IRS launched a homepage on the individual mandate with general information on minimum essential coverage requirements, exemptions, penalties and reporting. On March 24, the CBO released a score of SGR legislation attaching individual mandate repeal (S. 2122), as well, saying it would reduce spending by $288.1B over 10 years. While the SGR bill itself (S. 2110) would cost $180.3B over 10 years, the individual mandate provisions score $468.5B in savings. On March 12, the CBO posted a score indicating that the SGR repeal bill (H.R. 4015) with an amendment by House W&M Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) to delay the individual mandate penalties and payments until 2019 would reduce spending by $31.1B between 2014 and 2024, given the amendment’s effect of saving $169.5B over that period. According to a March 4 CBO score, H.R. 4118’s 1-year delay of the individual mandate’s penalties and corresponding payment schedule would reduce the deficit by $10B from 2014-2019 and by $9B from 2014-2024.

In an April 7, 2014 infographic, HHS explains the exemption from the individual mandate penalty that is available to American Indians and Alaska Natives in certain circumstances, as well as ways of claiming it through the Marketplace or tax returns. On March 31, CCIIO said those applying for coverage during Marketplace open enrollment who are determined eligible for Medicaid or CHIP will not face individual mandate penalties for the months in 2014 leading up to their coverage effective dates.

On April 8, 2014 Mark Iwry, a senior Treasury official, testified at a House Ways and Means Committee hearing on final employer mandate rules. According to news reports (Reuters), Iwry said the Administration does support individual mandate delay and has not evaluated authority to do so.

On April 29, the IRS published technical corrections (available here and here) to previously issued information reporting final regulations.

On May 27, 2014 the IRS released a consumer-oriented fact sheet covering what counts as minimum essential coverage (MEC), how people may qualify from exemptions from the ACA’s individual mandate and what penalties may apply in 2014 for not maintaining MEC. Additional resources include a chart of what qualifies as MEC (here) and a chart of individual mandate exemptions (here). The IRS also recently posted “basic examples of the payment calculation” for the individual mandate penalty (here). On April 30, state Insurance Commissioners wrote to President Obama expressing concern about the sustainability of individual and small group markets in U.S. territories absent an individual mandate.

On June 5, 2014, in updated projections, CBO estimates 4 million people will pay individual mandate penalties for being uninsured in 2016. The 2 million decline from Sept. 2012 estimates largely is driven by expected hardship exemptions. CBO and JCT estimate that penalties will total $4 billion in 2016, $3 billion less than the 2012 estimates, the last time they made such projections.

On July 24, 2014, the IRS released Revenue Procedure 2014-46 specifying the 2014 monthly national average bronze QHP premium that “is used to determine the maximum individual shared responsibility payment that may be due” (beginning in 2014, $204 monthly for an individual and $1,020 monthly for a family of five or more).

On August 8, the IRS posted a fact sheet that summarizes the availability of exemptions to paying the individual mandate penalty.

On Sept. 8, the IRS released a video on its YouTube page of the agency commissioner providing an overview of the individual mandate. On Sept. 18, CCIIO released guidance on the hardship exemption from the individual mandate, saying “all individuals with gross income below the filing threshold are entitled to a hardship exemption regardless of whether they file a return and regardless of whether they claim a dependent.” Also see Sept. 18 guidance establishing that those who are eligible for a hardship exemption for eligibility to receive services from an Indian health care provider, including the Indian Health Service, may claim the exemption through 2014 tax returns.

On Oct. 6, CCIIO posted guidance on individual mandate hardship exemptions, noting that most expire at the end of 2014 and that “consumers will not be able to use them to enroll or re-enroll in catastrophic coverage in 2015 with the exception of the hardship exemption for individuals who are eligible for services through the Indian Health Service.” Exemptions obtained because of non-ACA compliant canceled plans are valid for catastrophic plan eligibility until plan years beginning on or before Oct. 1, 2016.

On Oct. 28, the IRS released several consumer-focused resources in Spanish that address, among other topics, the premium tax credit and individual mandate.

On Nov. 6, DOL, HHS and Treasury issued FAQs specifying certain employer reimbursement arrangement that do not comply with ACA market reforms and reiterates that, pursuant to other guidance, can trigger penalties under the employer mandate.

On Nov. 23, CMS released a wide-ranging proposed rule, the 2016 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters (press release; fact sheet), addressing the ACA risk adjustment, reinsurance and risk corridors programs; cost-sharing parameters; Marketplace prescription drug coverage and other dimensions of essential health benefits (EHBs); QHP contracting with essential community providers; and rate review, among other issues that generally apply to 2016 coverage. Consistent with Nov. 4 guidance, the rule also proposes that employer plans not including substantial coverage of inpatient hospitalization or physician services would not meet ACA minimum value criteria. Comments are due by Dec. 22.

On Nov. 23, codifying a proposed rule issued in January 2014 on the individual mandate penalty for not maintaining minimum essential coverage (MEC), the IRS issued a final rule clarifying coverage under certain government-sponsored programs that the IRS does not consider to constitute government-sponsored MEC. Among other provisions, the rule finalizes the proposals that Medicaid benefits provided to medically needy individuals and coverage under section 1115 demonstration projects generally are not government-sponsored MEC. The agency further notes its authority in conjunction with HHS to designate certain such coverage as minimum essential coverage, citing the HHS’ Nov. 7 State Health Officials’ letter. The final rule also addresses hardship exemptions from the individual mandate penalty available without Exchange certification. Notice 2014-76, published concurrently with this final rule, provides a comprehensive list of all hardship exemptions that may be claimed on a tax return without obtaining an exemption certification from a Marketplace.

On Nov. 21, CCIIO issued guidance to Marketplaces on hardship exemptions involving certain limited-benefit Medicaid and CHIP coverage and those ineligible for Medicaid based on states’ opting not to participate in ACA-authorized expansion. On Nov. 7, the IRS issued a notice indicating that “an individual enrolled in a qualified health plan who becomes eligible for Medicaid coverage for pregnancy-related services that is minimum essential coverage, or for CHIP coverage based on pregnancy, is treated as eligible for minimum essential coverage under the Medicaid or CHIP coverage for purposes of the premium tax credit only if the individual enrolls in the coverage.”

On Nov. 26, CMS posted a Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) package containing the Quality Improvement Strategy Reporting Template discussed in the proposed 2016 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters. Also see a Nov. 26 PRA package stemming from the 2016 notice’s discussion of states’ 2017 opportunity to update essential health benefits benchmark plans.

2015

On Jan. 21, 2015, Sens. Hatch (R-UT) and Alexander (R-TN) reintroduced legislation to repeal the individual mandate. On Jan. 12, 2015, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case against the individual mandate brought by the American Association of Physicians. On Dec. 16, the IRS released Publication 5187 (fact sheet), which is intended to explain how “taxpayers satisfy the individual shared responsibility provision by enrolling in minimum essential coverage, qualifying for an exemption, or making a shared responsibility payment.”

On Jan. 27, 2015, the IRS posted a chart with guidance to consumers on filing 2014 taxes and assuring compliance with ACA requirements, including premium subsidy reconciliation and the individual mandate.

On Jan. 28, HHS announced that it is collaborating with non-profit organizations and certain large tax preparers to help consumers understand how the ACA impacts their taxes.

On Feb. 13, while not recognizing any new types of minimum essential coverage (MEC) for purposes of individual mandate compliance, CCIIO released guidance on criteria for assessing whether to consider health coverage as MEC

On Feb. 20, CMS finalized the wide-ranging final 2016 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters rule that addresses – among other topics – ACA premium stabilization, Marketplace open enrollment and user fee, rate review, essential health benefits, prescription drug coverage and other issues generally affecting Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) for the 2016 benefit year. Also see a fact sheet. Additionally, on Feb. 20, CCIIO finalized the 2016 letter to health insurance issuers in the Federally Facilitated Marketplace, which addresses QHP certification timelines, benefit design, essential community providers, network adequacy and other issues.

On Feb. 20, CMS announced that 800,000 Marketplace 1095-A Forms sent to Healthcare.gov consumers were affected by an error in the benchmark premium calculation. In a Feb. 23 letter to the Administration, Sen. Hatch (R-UT) requested specific details about the incorrect forms. On Feb. 24, according to reports, a Treasury official indicated that about 50,000 taxpayers who had already filed returns relying on erroneous 1095-As would not have to repay any resulting underpayments.

On Mar. 7, the IRS posted a publication, “Affordable Care Act: What Employers Need to Know,” that addresses information reporting and other topics.

On Mar. 20, CMS and Treasury said those who filed their taxes based on an incorrect 1095-A form will not have to re-file an amended tax return. CMS also said the “vast majority” now have access to a corrected 1095-A.

On Mar. 20, in guidance applicable to FFMs, CCIIO notes that a hardship exemption from the 2014 individual mandate penalty will be available to those with CHIP buy-in coverage because they may not have known it did not qualify as ACA minimum essential coverage (MEC). A similar exemption will be available for 2014 penalties for those covered by U.S. Olympic Committee Elite Athlete Health Insurance, which also does not qualify as MEC. The guidance also addresses hardship exemptions for those categorically eligible for Medicaid in 209(b) states that have spend-down provisions and clarifies earlier guidance on those enrolled in medically needy Medicaid.

On Apr. 24, the IRS released a notice indicating that “an individual who may enroll in a CHIP buy-in program that HHS has designated as minimum essential coverage is eligible for minimum essential coverage under the program for purposes of the premium tax credit only for the period the individual is enrolled.”

On Apr. 14, the House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee held a hearing on the ACA’s individual and employer mandates.

On May 8, the IRS posted an archived edition of a recent webinar addressing the individual mandate and premium tax credit.

On May 8, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration issued a report finding that IRS’ delay in employer and insurer information reporting “reduces the IRS’s ability to determine whether taxpayers and their dependents” have ACA minimum essential coverage.” It explores the agency’s individual mandate enforcement mechanisms and recommends that the penalty calculator, known as the Shared Responsibility Payment Calculation Tool, be added to IRS.gov for the 2016 filing year.

On July 15, CCIIO released slides on renewing enrollees with individual mandate hardship exemptions. On July 29, CCIIO released FAQs addressing State-based Marketplaces’ ability to have HHS process individual mandate exemption requests, among other topics.

On July 21, the IRS said approximately 7.5 million taxpayers reported a total of $1.5 billion in individual shared responsibility payments ($200 average), with about 12 million taxpayers claiming an exemption.

On July 29, GAO released a report urging IRS to strengthen oversight of premium subsidy and individual mandate penalty compliance.

On Sept. 15, CBO issued a score estimating that repealing the ACA’s individual mandate and associated penalties would reduce direct spending by $311 billion and decrease revenues by $6 billion over 10 years for a net reduction in the deficit of $305 billion between 2015-2025. 14 million more would be uninsured by 2025 compared with current projections, and individual premiums would increase by “roughly 20% relative to current law in all years between 2017 and 2025.”

On Sept. 29, the House Ways and Means Committee advanced reconciliation legislation that would repeal the individual and employer mandates, among other provisions.

On Dec. 7, CMS leaders released a blog post providing consumer education on the increased 2016 individual mandate penalty, including its calculation and available exemptions. They confirmed that a special enrollment period during tax filing season will not be offered.

2016

On Jan. 8, 2016, the IRS updated Congress on the status of premium tax credits and individual mandate penalties during the 2015 tax filing season (as of October 2015). The agency noted that about 7.9 million reported a total of $1.6 billion in individual mandate penalties averaging $210. About 12.4 million claimed one or more exemptions.

On July 8, the IRS published a proposed rule on the premium tax credit and individual mandate. The IRS explains that it “address[es] various issues regarding: (1) eligibility for the premium tax credit (including how opt-out arrangements affect an employee’s required contribution); (2) the due date for payment of premiums in the case of retroactive enrollments; (3) the premium assistance amount when certain coverage is terminated mid-month; (4) the benchmark plan premium (including how pediatric dental benefits affect the benchmark plan premium); (5) the reconciliation of advance payments for an individual whom no one claims as a dependent; and (6) certain information reporting rules [applicable to Exchanges].” Comments are due by Sept. 6, 2016.

On Aug. 15, the IRS and CCIIO announced a hardship exemption to the individual mandate for people who would have been eligible for the Health Care Tax Credit (HCTC) but do not participate in an interim process for receiving the credit before it is reinstated in January 2017.

On Sept. 27, the White House issued a Statement of Administration Policy opposing R. 954, the CO-OP Consumer Protection Act of 2016, which passed the House. It would temporarily exempt individuals from tax penalties if his or her insurance coverage ended mid-year because of a CO-OP closure.

2017

On Jan. 23, 2017, President Trump signed an executive order on minimizing the burdens of the ACA that alluded to using regulatory authority to “waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of the Act that would impose a fiscal burden on any State or a cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden on individuals, families, healthcare providers, health insurers, patients, recipients of healthcare services, purchasers of health insurance, or makers of medical devices, products, or medications.”

In late January, the IRS indicated that it would not systematically reject “silent returns” in which taxpayers do not indicate their coverage status under the ACA individual mandate. The agency cited the Trump Administration’s ACA executive order in seeking to mitigate burden.

On Jan. 24, the House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee held a hearing on the individual mandate.

Also on Jan. 24, the Senate Finance Committee held a confirmation hearing for HHS Secretary Tom Price during which he was questioned on the ACA individual mandate and other issues.  The Senate HELP Committee had held a hearing on Rep. Price’s confirmation on Jan. 18.

On Aug. 15, Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Ways and Means Ranking Member Richard Neal (D-MA) sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) urging the agency to investigate the Trump Administration’s enforcement of the individual mandate.

On Dec. 22, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted effectively repealing the individual mandate in 2019. See section 11081 on p. 39.

2018

On April 9, CMS issued guidance expanding hardship exemptions from the individual mandate in 2018, such as for individuals facing limited competition among QHPs.

Statutory Text

 
Implementation Status 
Summary 

SEC. 1501 [42 U.S.C. 18091]. REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL
COVERAGE.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) IN GENERAL.—The individual responsibility requirement
provided for in this section (in this subsection referred to
as the ‘‘requirement’’) is commercial and economic in nature,
and substantially affects interstate commerce, as a result of
the effects described in paragraph (2).
(2) EFFECTS ON THE NATIONAL ECONOMY AND INTERSTATE
COMMERCE.—øReplaced by section 10106(a)¿ The effects described
in this paragraph are the following:
(A) The requirement regulates activity that is commercial
and economic in nature: economic and financial decisions
about how and when health care is paid for, and
when health insurance is purchased. In the absence of the
requirement, some individuals would make an economic
and financial decision to forego health insurance coverage
and attempt to self-insure, which increases financial risks
to households and medical providers.
(B) Health insurance and health care services are a
significant part of the national economy. National health
spending is projected to increase from $2,500,000,000,000,
or 17.6 percent of the economy, in 2009 to
$4,700,000,000,000 in 2019. Private health insurance
spending is projected to be $854,000,000,000 in 2009, and
pays for medical supplies, drugs, and equipment that are
shipped in interstate commerce. Since most health insurance
is sold by national or regional health insurance companies,
health insurance is sold in interstate commerce
and claims payments flow through interstate commerce.
(C) The requirement, together with the other provisions
of this Act, will add millions of new consumers to the
health insurance market, increasing the supply of, and demand
for, health care services, and will increase the number
and share of Americans who are insured.
(D) The requirement achieves near-universal coverage
by building upon and strengthening the private employerbased
health insurance system, which covers 176,000,000
Americans nationwide. In Massachusetts, a similar requirement
has strengthened private employer-based coverage:
despite the economic downturn, the number of
workers offered employer-based coverage has actually increased.

(E) The economy loses up to $207,000,000,000 a year
because of the poorer health and shorter lifespan of the
uninsured. By significantly reducing the number of the uninsured,
the requirement, together with the other provisions
of this Act, will significantly reduce this economic
cost.
(F) The cost of providing uncompensated care to the
uninsured was $43,000,000,000 in 2008. To pay for this
cost, health care providers pass on the cost to private insurers,
which pass on the cost to families. This cost-shifting
increases family premiums by on average over $1,000
a year. By significantly reducing the number of the uninsured,
the requirement, together with the other provisions
of this Act, will lower health insurance premiums.
(G) 62 percent of all personal bankruptcies are caused
in part by medical expenses. By significantly increasing
health insurance coverage, the requirement, together with
the other provisions of this Act, will improve financial security
for families.
(H) Under the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), and this Act, the Federal
Government has a significant role in regulating health
insurance. The requirement is an essential part of this
larger regulation of economic activity, and the absence of
the requirement would undercut Federal regulation of the
health insurance market.
(I) Under sections 2704 and 2705 of the Public Health
Service Act (as added by section 1201 of this Act), if there
were no requirement, many individuals would wait to purchase
health insurance until they needed care. By significantly
increasing health insurance coverage, the requirement,
together with the other provisions of this Act, will
minimize this adverse selection and broaden the health insurance
risk pool to include healthy individuals, which will
lower health insurance premiums. The requirement is essential
to creating effective health insurance markets in
which improved health insurance products that are guaranteed
issue and do not exclude coverage of pre-existing
conditions can be sold. (J) Administrative costs for private health insurance,
which were $90,000,000,000 in 2006, are 26 to 30 percent
of premiums in the current individual and small group
markets. By significantly increasing health insurance coverage
and the size of purchasing pools, which will increase
economies of scale, the requirement, together with the
other provisions of this Act, will significantly reduce administrative
costs and lower health insurance premiums.
The requirement is essential to creating effective health
insurance markets that do not require underwriting and
eliminate its associated administrative costs.
(3) SUPREME COURT RULING.—In United States v. SouthEastern
Underwriters Association (322 U.S. 533 (1944)), the
Supreme Court of the United States ruled that insurance is
interstate commerce subject to Federal regulation.
(b) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new chapter:
‘‘CHAPTER 48—MAINTENANCE OF MINIMUM ESSENTIAL
COVERAGE
Sec. 15015000A IRC
‘‘Sec. 5000A. Requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage.
‘‘SEC. 5000A. REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.

‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.—An
applicable individual shall for each month beginning
after 2013 ensure that the individual, and any dependent of the individual
who is an applicable individual, is covered under minimum
essential coverage for such month.
‘‘(b) SHARED RESPONSIBILITY PAYMENT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—øReplaced by section 10106(b)¿ If a taxpayer
who is an applicable individual, or an applicable individual
for whom the taxpayer is liable under paragraph (3),
fails to meet the requirement of subsection (a) for 1 or more
months, then, except as provided in subsection (e), there is
hereby imposed on the taxpayer a penalty with respect to such
failures in the amount determined under subsection (c).
‘‘(2) INCLUSION WITH RETURN.—Any penalty imposed by
this section with respect to any month shall be included with
a taxpayer’s return under chapter 1 for the taxable year which
includes such month.
‘‘(3) PAYMENT OF PENALTY.—If an individual with respect
to whom a penalty is imposed by this section for any month—
‘‘(A) is a dependent (as defined in section 152) of another
taxpayer for the other taxpayer’s taxable year including
such month, such other taxpayer shall be liable for
such penalty, or
‘‘(B) files a joint return for the taxable year including
such month, such individual and the spouse of such individual
shall be jointly liable for such penalty.
‘‘(c) AMOUNT OF PENALTY.—[Paragraphs (1) and (2) were revised
in their entirety by section 10106(b)(2)]
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The amount of the penalty imposed by
this section on any taxpayer for any taxable year with respect
to failures described in subsection (b)(1) shall be equal to the
lesser of—
‘‘(A) the sum of the monthly penalty amounts determined
under paragraph (2) for months in the taxable year
during which 1 or more such failures occurred, or
‘‘(B) an amount equal to the national average premium
for qualified health plans which have a bronze level of coverage,
provide coverage for the applicable family size involved,
and are offered through Exchanges for plan years
beginning in the calendar year with or within which the
taxable year ends.
‘‘(2) MONTHLY PENALTY AMOUNTS.—For purposes of paragraph
(1)(A), the monthly penalty amount with respect to any
taxpayer for any month during which any failure described in
subsection (b)(1) occurred is an amount equal to 1⁄12 of the
greater of the following amounts:
‘‘(A) FLAT DOLLAR AMOUNT.—An amount equal to the
lesser of—
‘‘(i) the sum of the applicable dollar amounts for
all individuals with respect to whom such failure occurred
during such month, or
‘‘(ii) 300 percent of the applicable dollar amount
(determined without regard to paragraph (3)(C)) for
the calendar year with or within which the taxable
year ends.
‘‘(B) PERCENTAGE OF INCOME.—øAs revised by section
1002(a)(1) of HCERA¿ An amount equal to the following
percentage of the excess of the taxpayer’s household income
for the taxable year over the amount of gross income
specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer
for the taxable year:
‘‘(i) 1.0 percent for taxable years beginning in
2014.
‘‘(ii) 2.0 percent for taxable years beginning in
2015.
‘‘(iii) 2.5 percent for taxable years beginning after
2015.
‘‘(3) APPLICABLE DOLLAR AMOUNT.—[As revised by section
10106(b)(3) and by section 1002(a)(2) of HCERA] For purposes
of paragraph (1)—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraphs
(B) and (C), the applicable dollar amount is $695.
‘‘(B) PHASE IN.—The applicable dollar amount is $95
for 2014 and $325 for 2015.
‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS UNDER AGE 18.—
If an applicable individual has not attained the age of 18
as of the beginning of a month, the applicable dollar
amount with respect to such individual for the month shall
be equal to one-half of the applicable dollar amount for the
calendar year in which the month occurs.
‘‘(D) INDEXING OF AMOUNT.—In the case of any calendar
year beginning after 2016, the applicable dollar
amount shall be equal to $695, increased by an amount
equal to—
‘‘(i) $695, multiplied by
‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment determined
under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year, determined
by substituting ‘calendar year 2015’ for ‘calendar year
1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof.
If the amount of any increase under clause (i) is not a multiple
of $50, such increase shall be rounded to the next
lowest multiple of $50.
‘‘(4) TERMS RELATING TO INCOME AND FAMILIES.—For purposes
of this section—
‘‘(A) FAMILY SIZE.—The family size involved with respect
to any taxpayer shall be equal to the number of individuals
for whom the taxpayer is allowed a deduction
under section 151 (relating to allowance of deduction for
personal exemptions) for the taxable year.
‘‘(B) HOUSEHOLD INCOME.—The term ‘household income’
means, with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable
year, an amount equal to the sum of—[shown to reflect
probable amendment made by section 1004(a)(1)(C) of
HCERA]
‘‘(i) the modified adjusted gross income of the taxpayer,
plus
‘‘(ii) the aggregate modified adjusted gross incomes
of all other individuals who—
‘‘(I) were taken into account in determining
the taxpayer’s family size under paragraph (1),
and
‘‘(II) were required to file a return of tax imposed
by section 1 for the taxable year.
‘‘(C) MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.—[Replaced
by section 1004(a)(2)(B)] The term ‘modified adjusted gross
income’ means adjusted gross income increased by—
‘‘(i) any amount excluded from gross income under
section 911, and
‘‘(ii) any amount of interest received or accrued by
the taxpayer during the taxable year which is exempt
from tax.
‘‘(d) APPLICABLE INDIVIDUAL.—For purposes of this section—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘applicable individual’ means,
with respect to any month, an individual other than an individual
described in paragraph (2), (3), or (4).
‘‘(2) RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS.—
‘‘(A) RELIGIOUS CONSCIENCE EXEMPTION.—[Replaced
by section 10106(c)] Such term shall not include any individual
for any month if such individual has in effect an exemption
under section 1311(d)(4)(H) of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act which certifies that such individual
is—
‘‘(i) a member of a recognized religious sect or division
thereof which is described in section 1402(g)(1),
and ‘‘(ii) an adherent of established tenets or teachings
of such sect or division as described in such section.
‘‘(B) HEALTH CARE SHARING MINISTRY.— ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Such term shall not include any
individual for any month if such individual is a member
of a health care sharing ministry for the month.
‘‘(ii) HEALTH CARE SHARING MINISTRY.—The term
‘health care sharing ministry’ means an organization—
‘‘(I) which is described in section 501(c)(3) and
is exempt from taxation under section 501(a),
‘‘(II) members of which share a common set of
ethical or religious beliefs and share medical expenses
among members in accordance with those
beliefs and without regard to the State in which
a member resides or is employed,
‘‘(III) members of which retain membership
even after they develop a medical condition,
‘‘(IV) which (or a predecessor of which) has
been in existence at all times since December 31,
1999, and medical expenses of its members have
been shared continuously and without interruption
since at least December 31, 1999, and
‘‘(V) which conducts an annual audit which is
performed by an independent certified public accounting
firm in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and which is made available
to the public upon request.
‘‘(3) INDIVIDUALS NOT LAWFULLY PRESENT.—Such term
shall not include an individual for any month if for the month
the individual is not a citizen or national of the United States
or an alien lawfully present in the United States.
‘‘(4) INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS.—Such term shall not include
an individual for any month if for the month the individual
is incarcerated, other than incarceration pending the
disposition of charges.
‘‘(e) EXEMPTIONS.—No penalty shall be imposed under subsection
(a) with respect to—
‘‘(1) INDIVIDUALS WHO CANNOT AFFORD COVERAGE.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any applicable individual for any
month if the applicable individual’s required contribution
(determined on an annual basis) for coverage for the
month exceeds 8 percent of such individual’s household income
for the taxable year described in section 1412(b)(1)(B)
of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. For purposes
of applying this subparagraph, the taxpayer’s household
income shall be increased by any exclusion from gross
income for any portion of the required contribution made
through a salary reduction arrangement.
‘‘(B) REQUIRED CONTRIBUTION.—For purposes of this
paragraph, the term ‘required contribution’ means—
‘‘(i) in the case of an individual eligible to purchase
minimum essential coverage consisting of coverage
through an eligible-employer-sponsored plan, the
portion of the annual premium which would be paid
by the individual (without regard to whether paid
through salary reduction or otherwise) for self-only
coverage, or
‘‘(ii) in the case of an individual eligible only to
purchase minimum essential coverage described in
subsection (f)(1)(C), the annual premium for the lowest
cost bronze plan available in the individual market
through the Exchange in the State in the rating area
in which the individual resides (without regard to
whether the individual purchased a qualified health
plan through the Exchange), reduced by the amount of
the credit allowable under section 36B for the taxable
year (determined as if the individual was covered by
a qualified health plan offered through the Exchange
for the entire taxable year).
‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULES FOR INDIVIDUALS RELATED TO EM- PLOYEES.—øReplaced by section 10106(d)¿ For purposes of
subparagraph (B)(i), if an applicable individual is eligible
for minimum essential coverage through an employer by
reason of a relationship to an employee, the determination
under subparagraph (A) shall be made by reference to required
contribution of the employee.
‘‘(D) INDEXING.—In the case of plan years beginning in
any calendar year after 2014, subparagraph (A) shall be
applied by substituting for ‘8 percent’ the percentage the
Secretary of Health and Human Services determines reflects
the excess of the rate of premium growth between
the preceding calendar year and 2013 over the rate of income
growth for such period.
‘‘(2) TAXPAYERS WITH INCOME BELOW FILING THRESHOLD.—
[As revised by section 1002(b)(2) of HCERA] Any applicable individual
for any month during a calendar year if the individual’s
household income for the taxable year described in section
1412(b)(1)(B) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
is less than the amount of gross income specified in section
6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.
‘‘(3) MEMBERS OF INDIAN TRIBES.—Any applicable individual
for any month during which the individual is a member
of an Indian tribe (as defined in section 45A(c)(6)).
‘‘(4) MONTHS DURING SHORT COVERAGE GAPS.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any month the last day of which
occurred during a period in which the applicable individual
was not covered by minimum essential coverage for a continuous
period of less than 3 months.
‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULES.—For purposes of applying this
paragraph—
‘‘(i) the length of a continuous period shall be determined
without regard to the calendar years in
which months in such period occur,
‘‘(ii) if a continuous period is greater than the period
allowed under subparagraph (A), no exception
shall be provided under this paragraph for any month
in the period, and
‘‘(iii) if there is more than 1 continuous period described
in subparagraph (A) covering months in a calendar
year, the exception provided by this paragraph
shall only apply to months in the first of such periods.
The Secretary shall prescribe rules for the collection of the
penalty imposed by this section in cases where continuous
periods include months in more than 1 taxable year.
‘‘(5) HARDSHIPS.—Any applicable individual who for any
month is determined by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under section 1311(d)(4)(H) to have suffered a hardship
with respect to the capability to obtain coverage under a
qualified health plan.
‘‘(f) MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.—For purposes of this section—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘minimum essential coverage’
means any of the following:
‘‘(A) GOVERNMENT SPONSORED PROGRAMS.—Coverage
under—
‘‘(i) the Medicare program under part A of title
XVIII of the Social Security Act,
‘‘(ii) the Medicaid program under title XIX of the
Social Security Act,
‘‘(iii) the CHIP program under title XXI of the Social
Security Act,
‘‘(iv) the TRICARE for Life program,
‘‘(v) the veteran’s health care program under chapter
17 of title 38, United States Code, or
‘‘(vi) a health plan under section 2504(e) of title
22, United States Code (relating to Peace Corps volunteers).

‘‘(B) EMPLOYER-SPONSORED PLAN.—Coverage under an
eligible employer-sponsored plan.
‘‘(C) PLANS IN THE INDIVIDUAL MARKET.—Coverage
under a health plan offered in the individual market within
a State.
‘‘(D) GRANDFATHERED HEALTH PLAN.—Coverage under
a grandfathered health plan.
‘‘(E) OTHER COVERAGE.—Such other health benefits
coverage, such as a State health benefits risk pool, as the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, in coordination
with the Secretary, recognizes for purposes of this subsection.

‘‘(2) ELIGIBLE EMPLOYER-SPONSORED PLAN.—The term ‘eligible
employer-sponsored plan’ means, with respect to any employee,
a group health plan or group health insurance coverage
offered by an employer to the employee which is—
‘‘(A) a governmental plan (within the meaning of section
2791(d)(8) of the Public Health Service Act), or
‘‘(B) any other plan or coverage offered in the small or
large group market within a State.
Such term shall include a grandfathered health plan described
in paragraph (1)(D) offered in a group market.
‘‘(3) EXCEPTED BENEFITS NOT TREATED AS MINIMUM ESSENTIAL
COVERAGE.—The term ‘minimum essential coverage’ shall
not include health insurance coverage which consists of coverage
of excepted benefits—
‘‘(A) described in paragraph (1) of subsection (c) of section
2791 of the Public Health Service Act; or
‘‘(B) described in paragraph (2), (3), or (4) of such subsection
if the benefits are provided under a separate policy,
certificate, or contract of insurance.
‘‘(4) INDIVIDUALS RESIDING OUTSIDE UNITED STATES OR
RESIDENTS OF TERRITORIES.—Any applicable individual shall be
treated as having minimum essential coverage for any
month—
‘‘(A) if such month occurs during any period described
in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 911(d)(1) which is applicable
to the individual, or
‘‘(B) if such individual is a bona fide resident of any
possession of the United States (as determined under section
937(a)) for such month.
‘‘(5) INSURANCE-RELATED TERMS.—Any term used in this
section which is also used in title I of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act shall have the same meaning as when
used in such title.
‘‘(g) ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURE.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The penalty provided by this section
shall be paid upon notice and demand by the Secretary, and
except as provided in paragraph (2), shall be assessed and collected
in the same manner as an assessable penalty under subchapter
B of chapter 68.
‘‘(2) SPECIAL RULES.—Notwithstanding any other provision
of law—
‘‘(A) WAIVER OF CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—In the case of
any failure by a taxpayer to timely pay any penalty imposed
by this section, such taxpayer shall not be subject to
any criminal prosecution or penalty with respect to such
failure.
‘‘(B) LIMITATIONS ON LIENS AND LEVIES.—The Secretary
shall not—
‘‘(i) file notice of lien with respect to any property
of a taxpayer by reason of any failure to pay the penalty
imposed by this section, or
‘‘(ii) levy on any such property with respect to
such failure.’’.
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters for subtitle
D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting
after the item relating to chapter 47 the following new item:
‘‘CHAPTER 48—MAINTENANCE OF MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.’’.
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section
shall apply to taxable years ending after December 31, 2013.

Browse ACA Titles

  • I-Quality, Affordable Health Care for all Americans
  • II-Role of Public Programs
  • III-Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Health Care
  • IV-Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving Public Health
  • V-Health Care Workforce
  • VI-Transparency and Program Integrity
  • VII-Improving Access to Innovative Medical Therapies
  • VIII-Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS ACT)
  • IX-Revenue Provisions

ABOUT

  • Home
  • About Policy Hub
  • Free Newsletter
  • Team
  • Mission and Values
  • Contact Us

Contact Us

Impact Health Policy Partners 1301 K Street, NW, Suite 300W
Washington, D.C. 20005

(202) 309-0796
Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 ‐ Impact Health Policy Partners ‐ All Rights Reserved ‐ Privacy Policy ‐ Terms and Conditions ‐ Log in