My Policy Hub

Improving health is our policy

  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • Impact Insights
  • Issues
  • ACA Now
  • Search
  • Contact

ACA Now

3401 - Revision of Certain Market Basket Updates and Incorporation of Productivity Improvements into Market Basket Updates that do not Already Incorporate such Improvements

 
Implementation Status 
Statutory Text 

Summary

Amended by sections 10319 of the Manager’s Amendment and 1105 of HCERA. Revises payment updates in Medicare fee-for-service as follows:

  • Inpatient and outpatient hospitals, inpatient rehab facilities and psychiatric hospitals: -0.25% in 2010 and 2011, -0.1% in 2012 and 2013, -0.3% in 2014, -0.2% in 2015 and 2016 and 0.75% from 2017-2019. Productivity adjustment applied beginning in 2012.
  • Long-term care hospitals: -0.25% in 2010, -0.5% in 2011, -0.1% in 2012 and 2013, -0.3% in 2014, -0.2% in 2015 and 2016 and -0.75% from 2017-2019. Productivity adjustment applied starting in 2012.
  • Home health agencies: -1.0% from 2011-2013 and productivity adjustment applied starting in 2015.
  • Hospice: -0.3% for 2013-2019, though cuts from 2014-2019 may be waived if rates of insurance do not increase as much as projected by CBO. Productivity adjustment applied beginning in 2013.
  • Skilled nursing facilities: No adjustments to market basket except for the productivity adjustment to be applied starting in 2012.
  • Clinical laboratory services: Expected 0.5% increases for 2011-2013 eliminated and -1.75% reductions applied to 2011-2015. Productivity adjustment begins in 2011 but is not to be applied of the resulting update is 0 or negative.
  • Renal dialysis facilities: Eliminates the -1.0% reduction under current law and replaces it with a productivity adjustment beginning in 2012.

Other services: For services not described above whose payment updates are dictated by the consumer price index (such as durable medical equipment and ambulatory surgical centers), applies a productivity adjustment starting in 2011.

Last updated: (August 31, 2016)  

Implementation Status

 
Summary 
Statutory Text 

By the end of 2012, CMS had begun implementing these provisions via the annual regulatory cycles for these providers. To access additional details regarding reimbursement for these fee-for-service providers, see CMS’s general information page for prospective payment systems in Medicare.

2013

On May 1, CMS issued its FY 2014 Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) Prospective Payment System (PPS) and Consolidated Billing proposed rule. This rule addresses provisions pertaining to sections 3108 and 3401 of the ACA.  Comments on the proposed rule are due by 5pm ET on July 1.

On May 2, CMS released its FY 2014 Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Prospective Payment System (PPS) proposed rule. Among other things, CMS proposes revisions to the FY 2014 market basket (MB) update, as well as revises the list of diagnosis codes that are used to determine presumptive compliance under the “60% rule,” in addition to delineating changes to the quality measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program (QRP).  Comments are due July 1.

On July 8, 2013, CMS released its CY14 hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system proposed rule in which it contemplates these provisions of the ACA in its proposal.  Comments on the underlying proposed rule are due by September 6, 2013.  A CMS press release is available here.

On July 2, 2013, CMS released its CY14 End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) proposed ruleimplementing an ATRA-required cut to the ESRD bundled payment of 12%, leading CMS to project a net year over year reduction to dialysis facilities of 9.4% for CY14 after taking into account a 2.9% MB update and -0.4% productivity adjustment called for under this provision of the law and some additional minor factors.  Comments are due by August 30, 2013.  A CMS press release is available here.

On July 31, CMS issued its FY 2014 skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) prospective payment system (PPS) and consolidated billing final rule for estimating that aggregate FY 2014 payments, relative to FY 2013, will increase by 1.3% (or $470M).  In the rule, the agency addressed the ACA-mandated productivity adjustment under section 3401; provisions pertaining to the permissibility of physician assistants to order post-hospital extended care services at section 3108; and hospice wage index improvements delineated at section 3137.

On July 31, CMS issued its FY 2014 Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Prospective Payment System (PPS) final rule under which payments are projected to increase by 2.3% in FY14 , or by $170 million relative to FY13 figures.  The final rule includes a discussion of the ACA-mandated productivity adjustment at section 3401; hospice wage index improvements delineated at section 3137; and the IRF Quality Reporting Program (QRP) at section 3004.

On August 2, 2013, CMS issued its FY 2014 Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and Long-Term Care Hospital (LTCH) PPS final rule under which gross hospital payments will be $1.2 billion higher in FY 2014 than they were in FY 2013 – much higher than the $27 million increase initially proposed.  The final rule addresses a number of IPPS and LTCH payment and quality-related provisions authorized or amended by the ACA.

On Nov. 22, 2013, CMS issued its CY 2014 HH PPS final rule (slated to be published in the Federal Register on Dec. 2) in which the agency estimates home health agencies (HHAs) will see a 1.05 percent net cut—for an aggregate decline of $200M in Medicare payments to HHAs in CY 2014.  The net -1.05 percent cut reflects (as outlined in Table 33 on p. 214 of the proposed rule):  +2.3 percent in home health payment update percentage;  -2.73 percent due to ACA-mandated rebasing adjustments; and  -0.62 percent stemming from impacts of the HH PPS Grouper scoring changes.  Also: CMS press release and fact sheet.

Also on Nov. 22, CMS issued the CY 2014 ESRD final rule (slated to be published in the Federal Register on Dec. 2) in which – due to a phase in of the ATRA-mandated drug utilization adjustment – the “overall impact of the CY 2014 changes is projected to result in an average increase in payments of 0.0 percent from CY 2013 to CY 2014,” compared with an estimated net 9.4% cut foreseen in the proposed rule (which did not include a phase in).  A press release is available here.

On November 27, 2013, CMS released the CY14 Medicare Hospital Outpatient Department (HOPD) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) final rule. Most elements of the final rule were in line with what was proposed, except for CMS’s decision to delay by one year the creation of 29 new comprehensive APCs to replace 29 existing device-dependent APCs. Comments on the rule are due by January 27.

On November 27, 2013, CMS issued the CY14 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) final rule, in which it decided not to finalize proposed cuts to potentially misvalued codes with higher reimbursement rates than in the hospital outpatient setting. The rule did make some RVU changes that cut some specialties, however, and added a separate payment for non-face-to-face chronic care management services.

On November 22, 2013, CMS issued guidance (Change Request 8517), indicating that the annual update to the local clinical laboratory fees for CY 2014 is (-0.75%), in part due to the ACA productivity adjustment.

2014

On May 1, CMS issued a proposed rule updating FY 2015 Medicare payment policies and rates for inpatient stays at general acute care and LTCHs. Under the proposed rule, hospitals that participate in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program and are ‘meaningful users’ of EHRs would receive a 1.3% payment update. However, the 1.3% rate increase, when coupled with the payment policy reductions – including those under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, the Hospital Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, Medicare DSH changes as well as “the expiration of certain statutory provisions that provided special temporary increases in payments to hospitals and other proposed changes” – would ultimately decrease IPPS operating payments by approximately 0.8% or $241 million over FY 2015 payment levels. Also of note, gross LTCH payments under the proposed rule would increase by 0.8% or $44 million over FY 2014 payments, with a delay (pursuant to the statutory mandate) in the full application of the 25% Rule patient threshold, among other key LTCH policy changes denoted further below. Comments are due by June 30, 2014. CMS fact sheets are available here and here. A CMS press release is available here.

On May 1, CMS issued its FY 2015 IRF PPS proposed rule under which the agency proposes a net increase of 2.2%, or roughly $160 million, in Medicare payments to IRFs in FY 2015 over the FY 2014 payment update. CMS indicates that the net update reflects a 2.1% increase (2.7% MB update less the 0.4% statutory productivity adjustment, further reduced by the 0.2% reduction called for by the ACA). However, “[a]n additional 0.1% increase to aggregate payments due to updating the outlier threshold results in an overall update of 2.2%…” A CMS fact sheet is available here. Comments are due June 30, 2014.

On May 2, CMS released the proposed FY 2015 hospice wage index and payment rate update (available here; fact sheet), in which the agency estimates that FY15 hospice payments would increase by an estimated $230 million, 1.3% net, reflecting the following factors: (1)   2.0% proposed payment update to the hospice per diem rates (a “hospital market basket” increase of 2.7 percent minus 0.7 percentage point for statutory reductions); and  -0.7% in hospice payments, stemming from “updated wage data and the sixth year of CMS’s seven-year phase-out of its wage index budget neutrality adjustment factor (BNAF),” the agency explains. The regulation addresses these ACA provisions. Comments are due by July 1.

On May 1, CMS issued its FY 2015 SNF PPS proposed rule, which proposes to increase Medicare payments to SNFs by 2%, or roughly $750 million, in FY 2015 – an increase over the 1.3% update effectuated under last year’s FY 2014 final regulation. CMS notes that the 2% update factor reflects a 2.4% MB increase less a 0.4% statutory productivity adjustment. A CMS fact sheet is available here. Comments are due by June 30, 2014.

On July 1, CMS issued its CY15 Medicare HHA PPS proposed rule under which CMS estimates that HHAs will see a -0.3% update – for an aggregate decrease of $58 million in Medicare payments to HHAs in CY 2015. A CMS fact sheet is available here.  These key ACA provisions are addressed in the underlying rule.  Comments on the proposed rule are due by September 2, 2014.

On July 2, CMS released its CY15 ESRD PPS proposed rule which, following an advance notice of proposed rule-making on the topic, also embeds separate proposals on implementing the ACA-mandated adjustments to DME to reflect competitively bid rates. CMS estimates that overall, ESRD facilities will experience a 0.3% increase in 2015 for an increase of about $30M in Medicare payments, which derive from updates to the outlier threshold amounts. CMS notes for CY15, under the proposal, hospital-based ESRD facilities have an estimated 0.5% increase in payments coed with freestanding facilities seeing an estimated 0.3% increase. CMS also “projects that urban ESRD facilities will receive an estimated increase in payments of 0.4% while rural facilities will receive a decrease of 0.5%.” Also, the proposed rule also contains proposals on establishing a methodology for adjusting DMEPOS payment amounts using information from the Medicare DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program and adopting a phase-in of “special payment rules” for certain DME and enteral nutrition in certain areas. These key ACA provisions are addressed in the proposed rule. An agency fact sheet on the proposed rule, including the DME components, is available here. Comments on the proposed rule are due by September 2, 2014.

On July 3, CMS issued its CY15 HOPPS/ASC proposed rule in which the agency estimates that CY15 payments would increase hospital OPPS payments by 2.2% compared with CY14 payments, with ASCs to see an estimated 1.2% increase. These key ACA provisions are addressed in the underlying rule. An agency fact sheet is available here. Comments are due by September 2, 2014.

On August 4, CMS issued a final rule updating FY 2015 Medicare payment policies and rates for inpatient stays at general acute care and LTCHs. The final rule also codifies “two interim final rules with comment period relating to criteria for disproportionate share hospital [DSH] uncompensated care payments and extensions of temporary changes to the payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals and of the Medicare-Dependent, Small Rural Hospital (MDH) Program.”

Under the final rule, hospitals that participate in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program and are ‘meaningful users’ of EHRs would receive a 1.4% payment update – up slightly from the agency’s 1.3% proposed increased. However, the 1.4% rate increase, when coupled with payment policy reductions enumerated further below – including reductions under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, changes to Medicare DSH payments, and so forth – are projected to decrease IPPS operating payments by approximately 0.6%” (compared to the net decrease of 0.8% under the proposed rule) – or by roughly $756 million in FY 2015.

CMS also finalized its proposal to continue its slow phase-in of the ATRA’s coding intensity adjustment, leaving ~$8 billion to be recouped in FYs ‘15 and ‘16.

Gross LTCH payments under the final rule would increase by 1.1%  – up from the 0.8% CMS put forward in its proposed rule, with a delay (pursuant to the statutory mandate) in the full application of the 25% Rule patient threshold, among other key LTCH policy changes denoted further below.

CMS fact sheets are available here and here.  An agency press release is available here.

On August 11, CMS issued a MLN Matters article addressing hospice market basket revisions and quality reporting program provisions pursuant to the ACA.

On Oct. 31, CMS issued  its CY 15 ESRD final rule that also incorporates separate provisions finalizing a methodology – driven by the ACA – to adjust DMEPOS fee schedule payments based on competitively bid rates. The final regulation addresses the ACA productivity adjustment (at sec. 3401) as well as special payment rules for DME and enteral nutrition via sec. 3021 authority. Under the rule, CMS estimates that compared with CY14, ESRD facilities will see a 0.3% net increase in estimated CY15 Medicare payments – the same as estimated under the proposed rule. A fact sheet on the rule is available here.

On Oct. 31, CMS released the CY 15 OPPS/ASC final rule (fact sheet), estimating that net OPPS payments will increase by 2.3% (vs. 2.2% in the proposed rule) compared with CY 14 payments. This represents a $5.1B increase or $900M when changes stemming from enrollment, utilization, and case-mix are excluded. The final rule addresses these provisions of the ACA.

2015

On Apr. 15, CMS issued a proposed rule (fact sheet) updating FY 2016 payments under the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Prospective Payment System (PPS). According to the proposals delineated in the rule, Medicare payments to SNFs are expected to increase by 1.4%, or $500 million, over FY 2015 rates

On Apr. 23, CMS proposed to increase Medicare payments to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) by a net 1.7%, or roughly $130 million in FY 2016, which addressed these provisions in the law.

On Apr. 17, 2015 as part of a proposed rule updating FY 2016 Medicare payment policies and rates for inpatient stays at general acute care and LTCHs, CMS proposed “to extend the imputed floor policy (both the original methodology and the alternative methodology) for 1 additional year, through September 30, 2016, while [they] continue to explore potential wage index reforms.” The regulation addressed this provision of the ACA.

On Apr. 17, as part of a proposed rule updating FY 2016 Medicare payment policies and rates for inpatient stays at general acute care and LTCHs, CMS updated the national standardized amount for inpatient operating cost by a factor called the “applicable percentage increase” 2.7%, along with a -0.6 multifactor productivity adjustment, and a -0.2% “other” adjustment. The regulation addressed this provision of the ACA.

On Apr. 24, CMS released a proposed rule (fact sheet) on the FY16 inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system (IPF PPS) and rate update. CMS estimates that IPFs will see a 1.6% increase in FY16 payments, $80M above FY15. The regulation addressed this provision of the ACA

On June 24, the House voted to approve H.R. 1190 the Protecting Seniors Access to Medicare Act of 2015, which repeals the Independent Payment Advisory Review Board (IPAB).

On July 1, CMS released its CY 16 Medicare hospital OPPS and ambulatory surgical center proposed rule (fact sheet), which estimated that net CY 16 OPPS payments will decrease by -0.2%, or $43 million, compared with CY 15 payments. Comments are due by Aug. 31

On July, 6, CMS issued a proposed rule (press release; fact sheet) enumerating CY 16 payments under the Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS). Under the proposed rule, CMS estimates that home health agencies (HHAs) will see a -1.8% update, for an aggregate decrease of roughly $350 million in Medicare payments to HHAs in CY 16. Comments are due Sept. 4.

On July 8, CMS posted the CY 16 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) proposed rule, which delineates payment policies impacting over one million physicians and other practitioners paid under the MPFS each year (see fact sheet here). Citing the latest doc fix (P.L. 114-10), the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), CMS effectuates the statutory 0.5% increase. Comments are due Sept. 8.

On July 30, CMS released a final rule (fact sheet) updating the FY 16 Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Prospective Payment System (PPS). Under the final rule, Medicare payments to SNFs are expected to increase by 1.2% (versus 1.4% in April’s proposed rule), with aggregate FY16 payments rising by $430M compared with FY 15.

On July 31, CMS released the FY 16 inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) and long-term care hospital PPS final rule affecting discharges beginning on Oct. 1, 2015.  The rule also includes an embedded interim final rule with comment period effectuating the statutory extension of the Medicare-dependent, small rural hospital Program and changes to the low-volume payment adjustment.

On July 31, CMS released an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) final rule in which it estimated that FY 16 payments will increase by 1.8% or $135 million across all IRFs compared with FY 2015.

On July 31, CMS finalized its proposal (fact sheet here) to update rates and certain policies related to the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Prospective Payment System (IPF PPS) for FY 16. The final rule reflects a 1.5% increase in CMS’ estimated payments to IPFs relative to its FY 15 estimate.

On July 31, CMS released its final FY 16 hospice wage index and payment rate update (available here; fact sheet), estimating that net Medicare payments to hospices will increase by $160 million, or 1.1%.

2016

On Apr. 21, CMS released a proposal updating payment regulations for hospices. Under the proposed rule, net Medicare payments to hospices will increase by $330 million or 2.0 percent. The update is based on a market basket of 2.8 percent less a 0.5 percent productivity adjustment and a 0.3 percentage point adjustment set by the ACA.

On Apr. 21, CMS released a proposal updating payment regulations for Skilled Nursing Facilities. Under the proposal CMS estimates that overall payments to SNFs will increase by $800 million or 2.1 percent above FY 2016 levels.

On Apr. 21, CMS released a proposal updating payment regulations for Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs). Under the proposed rule, FY 2017 Medicare payments will increase by $125 million or 1.6 percent across all IRFs compared with FY 2016. This stems from an estimated 1.45 percent increase factor (an IRF-specific market basket estimate of 2.7 percent, minus a 0.5 percent multi-factor productivity adjustment and 0.75 percentage point statutory reduction) plus 0.2 percent for outlier threshold result updates. Table 21 on p. 158 of the public inspection copy provides fuller detail on the estimated payment impacts across facilities (by region, ownership status, etc.).

On Apr.19, CMS released the FY 2017 inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) and long-term care hospital PPS and policy proposed rule that, once, finalized, will apply to discharges beginning on or after Oct. 1, 2016. Under the rule, CMS estimates a net average payment increase of 0.7 percent (a roughly $539 million increase in spending, including capital) in FY 2017 for the IPPS. For LTCH’s, and stemming largely from the application of statutory site-neutrality provisions in the Pathway for SGR Reform Act, CMS estimates that FY 2017 payments will decrease by an estimated $355 million or -6.9 percent in FY 2017.

On June 24, CMS released the calendar year 2017 proposed rule for the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) prospective payment system (PPS), which updates rates for renal dialysis services provided to Medicare beneficiaries on or after Jan. 1, 2017. CMS anticipates that aggregate ESRD PPS payments to dialysis facilities will increase by about $50 million in CY 2017, with $30 million stemming from the payment rate update and $20 million from updates to the outlier threshold amounts. This translates to an estimated +5 percent net rate update to ESRD facilities in CY 2017 compared with CY 2016. Comments are due by Aug. 23, 2016.

On June 27, CMS released its proposed rule on the calendar year (CY) 2017 home health prospective payment system rate update, which also proposes further policies for implementing a Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) Model beginning in CY 2018. CMS estimates that Medicare payments to home health agencies (HHAs) will decline by 1.0 percent in CY 2017, reflecting a $180 million decrease compared with CY 2016. Comments are due by Aug. 26, 2016.

On July 6, CMS released the calendar year (CY) 2017 hospital outpatient prospective system (OPPS) and ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system proposed rule. CMS estimates that overall, hospital outpatient departments (OPDs) will experience a 1.6 percent – or $5.1 billion – increase relative to CY 2016.

On July 28, 2016, CMS issued a notice updating fiscal year (FY) 2017 Medicare payment policies and rates for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System (IPF PPS). CMS estimates IPF payments to increase by 2.2 percent or $100 million in FY 2017.

July 29, CMS released a final rule that says net Medicare payments to hospices will increase by $350 million or 2.1 percent. The update is based on a market basket (MB) of 2.7 percent less a 0.3 percent productivity adjustment and a 0.3 percentage point adjustment set by the ACA. The final rule reflects a $20 million increase over proposed levels.

On July 29, CMS announced Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) rates in its annual payment rule. Under the rule, FY 2017 Medicare payments will increase by $145 million or 1.9 percent across all IRFs compared with FY 2016. This stems from an estimated 1.65 percent increase factor (an IRF-specific market basket estimate of 2.7 percent, minus a 0.3 percent multi-factor productivity adjustment and 0.75 percentage point statutory reduction) plus 0.3 percent for outlier threshold result updates. The final rule reflects a $20 million increase over proposed levels.

On July 29, CMS released the Skilled Nursing Facility payment rule. CMS estimates that overall payments to SNFs will increase by $920 million or 2.4 percent above FY 2016 levels. CMS clarifies that this estimate “is attributable to a 2.7 percent [MB] increase reduced by 0.3 percentage points, in accordance with the multi-factor productivity adjustment required by law.” The final rule reflects a $120 million increase over proposed levels.

On Aug. 2, CMS released the FY 2017 inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) and long-term care hospital (LTCH) PPS and policy final rule. The final rule governs FY 2017 payments to approximately 3,330 acute care hospitals and 430 LTCHs through the IPPS and LTCH PPS, respectively, and effectuates key policy changes. Under the rule, net payments to inpatient hospitals will increase by 0.95 percent on average compared with FY 2016. For the IPPS, the rule finalizes the 1.5 percent documentation and coding recoupment cut, as proposed, and delays the proposed incorporation of S-10 data into uncompensated care calculations. LTCH PPS payments will decrease by 7.1 percent under the LTCH PPS amid the ongoing implementation of site neutrality and will increase by 0.7 percent for cases qualifying for the higher standard rate. The aforementioned provisions are addressed in this regulation.

On Oct. 31, CMS released the calendar year 2017 final rule for the ESRD PPS. The rule also addresses key policies related to the DMEPOS Competitive Bidding (CB) Program.

On Nov. 1, CMS released the CY 2017 HOPD/ASC payment system final rule. CMS estimates that overall, HOPDs will experience a 1.7 percent (up from 1.6 percent under the proposed rule) increase relative to CY 2016.

2017

On April 27, CMS released a proposed rule that would update the prospective payment rates for SNFs for FY 2018. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

On April 27, CMS released its proposal to revise the FY 2018 Medicare IPPS/LTCH PPS. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

On April 27, CMS released a proposed rule that would update the FY 2018 prospective payment rates for IRFs. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

On April 27, CMS released its hospice proposed rule updating the hospice wage index, payment rates, and cap amount for FY 2018. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

On June 29, CMS released its CY 2018 proposed rule updating the ESRD PPS. CMS expects to make about $10 billion in payments to 6,750 ESRD facilities in CY 2018. Proposals also address updates to outlier policy, including for pricing drugs and biologics. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

On July 14, CMS proposed updated payment policies applying to hospital outpatient departments and ASCs beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2018. CMS estimates that overall, hospital outpatient departments (OPDs) will experience a 2.0 percent increase ($5.7 billion) relative to CY 2017. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

On July 14, CMS released the CY 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) proposed rule. The proposal updates rates and policies applicable to Medicare physicians and other professionals under Medicare Part B as of Jan. 1, 2018. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

On Aug. 1, CMS finalized rulemaking that would update the prospective payment rates for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for FY 2018. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

On Aug. 1, CMS released final rulemaking that to update the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for FY 2018. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

On Aug. 3, CMS finalized a rule to revise the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) and the Long-Term Care Hospital (LTCH) Prospective Payment System for FY 2018. This provision of the ACA is addressed in the rule.

 

Statutory Text

 
Implementation Status 
Summary 

SEC. 3401. REVISION OF CERTAIN MARKET BASKET UPDATES AND INCORPORATION OF PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS INTO MARKET BASKET UPDATES THAT DO NOT ALREADY INCORPORATE SUCH IMPROVEMENTS. (a) INPATIENT ACUTE HOSPITALS.—Section 1886(b)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)), as amended by section 3001(a)(3), is further amended— (1) in clause (i)(XX), by striking ‘‘clause (viii)’’ and inserting ‘‘clauses (viii), (ix), (xi), and (xii)’’; (2) in the first sentence of clause (viii), by inserting ‘‘of such applicable percentage increase (determined without regard to clause (ix), (xi), or (xii))’’ after ‘‘one-quarter’’; (3) in the first sentence of clause (ix)(I), by inserting ‘‘(determined without regard to clause (viii), (xi), or (xii))’’ after ‘‘clause (i)’’ the second time it appears; and (4) by adding at the end the following new clauses: ‘‘(xi)(I) For 2012 and each subsequent fiscal year, after determining the applicable percentage increase described in clause (i) and after application of clauses (viii) and (ix), such percentage increase shall be reduced by the productivity adjustment described in subclause (II). ‘‘(II) The productivity adjustment described in this subclause, with respect to a percentage, factor, or update for a fiscal year, year, cost reporting period, or other annual period, is a productivity adjustment equal to the 10-year moving average of changes in annual economy-wide private nonfarm business multi-factor productivity (as projected by the Secretary for the 10-year period ending with the applicable fiscal year, year, cost reporting period, or other annual period). ‘‘(III) The application of subclause (I) may result in the applicable percentage increase described in clause (i) being less than 0.0 for a fiscal year, and may result in payment rates under this section for a fiscal year being less than such payment rates for the preceding fiscal year. ‘‘(xii) After determining the applicable percentage increase described in clause (i), and after application of clauses (viii), (ix), and (xi), the Secretary shall reduce such applicable percentage increase—øAs revised by section 10319(a)¿ ‘‘(I) for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011, by 0.25 percentage point; ‘‘(II) for each of fiscal years 2012 and 2013, by 0.1 percentage point; ‘‘(III) for fiscal year 2014, by 0.3 percentage point; ‘‘(IV) for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016, by 0.2 percentage point; and ‘‘(V) for each of fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019, by 0.75 percentage point. The application of this clause may result in the applicable percentage increase described in clause (i) being less than 0.0 for a fiscal year, and may result in payment rates under this section for a fiscal year being less than such payment rates for the preceding fiscal year. øAs revised by section 1105(a)(2) of HCERA¿’’. (b) SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES.—Section 1888(e)(5)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395yy(e)(5)(B)) is amended— (1) by striking ‘‘PERCENTAGE.—The term’’ and inserting ‘‘PERCENTAGE.— ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to clause (ii), the term’’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new clause: ‘‘(ii) ADJUSTMENT.—For fiscal year 2012 and each subsequent fiscal year, after determining the percentage described in clause (i), the Secretary shall reduce such percentage by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II). The application of the preceding sentence may result in such percentage being less than 0.0 for a fiscal year, and may result in payment rates under this subsection for a fiscal year being less than such payment rates for the preceding fiscal year.’’. (c) LONG-TERM CARE HOSPITALS.—Section 1886(m) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(m)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: ‘‘(3) IMPLEMENTATION FOR RATE YEAR 2010 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In implementing the system described in paragraph (1) for rate year 2010 and each subsequent rate year, any annual update to a standard Federal rate for discharges for the hospital during the rate year, shall be reduced— ‘‘(i) for rate year 2012 and each subsequent rate year, by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and ‘‘(ii) for each of rate years 2010 through 2019, by the other adjustment described in paragraph (4). ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE.—The application of this paragraph may result in such annual update being less than 0.0 for a rate year, and may result in payment rates under the system described in paragraph (1) for a rate year being less than such payment rates for the preceding rate year. ‘‘(4) OTHER ADJUSTMENT.—øAs revised by section 10319(b) and section 1105(b) of HCERA¿ For purposes of paragraph (3)(A)(ii), the other adjustment described in this paragraph is— ‘‘(A) for rate year 2010, 0.25 percentage point; ‘‘(B) for rate year 2011, 0.50 percentage point; ‘‘(C) for each of the rate years beginning in 2012 and 2013, 0.1 percentage point; ‘‘(D) for rate year 2014, 0.3 percentage point; ‘‘(E) for each of rate years 2015 and 2016, 0.2 percentage point; and ‘‘(F) for each of rate years 2017, 2018, and 2019, 0.75 percentage point.’’. (d) INPATIENT REHABILITATION FACILITIES.—Section 1886(j)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(j)(3)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (C)—(A) by striking ‘‘FACTOR.—For purposes’’ and inserting ‘‘FACTOR.— ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes’’; (B) by inserting ‘‘subject to clause (ii)’’ before the period at the end of the first sentence of clause (i), as added by paragraph (1); and (C) by adding at the end the following new clause: ‘‘(ii) PRODUCTIVITY AND OTHER ADJUSTMENT.— After establishing the increase factor described in clause (i) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall reduce such increase factor— ‘‘(I) for fiscal year 2012 and each subsequent fiscal year, by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and ‘‘(II) for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2019, by the other adjustment described in subparagraph (D). The application of this clause may result in the increase factor under this subparagraph being less than 0.0 for a fiscal year, and may result in payment rates under this subsection for a fiscal year being less than such payment rates for the preceding fiscal year.’’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘‘(D) OTHER ADJUSTMENT.—øAs revised by section 10319(b) and section 1105(b) of HCERA¿ For purposes of subparagraph (C)(ii)(II), the other adjustment described in this subparagraph is— ‘‘(i) for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011, 0.25 percentage point; ‘‘(ii) for each of fiscal years 2012 and 2013, 0.1 percentage point; ‘‘(iii) for fiscal year 2014, 0.3 percentage point; ‘‘(iv) for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016, 0.2 percentage point; and ‘‘(v) for each of fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019, 0.75 percentage point.’’. (e) HOME HEALTH AGENCIES.—Section 1895(b)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395fff(b)(3)(B)) is amended— (1) in clause (ii)(V), by striking ‘‘clause (v)’’ and inserting ‘‘clauses (v) and (vi)’’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new clause: ‘‘(vi) ADJUSTMENTS.—After determining the home health market basket percentage increase under clause (iii), and after application of clause (v), the Secretary shall reduce such percentage— ‘‘(I) for 2015 and each subsequent year, by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and ‘‘(II) for each of 2011, 2012, and 2013, by 1 percentage point. øAs revised by section 10319(d)¿ The application of this clause may result in the home health market basket percentage increase under clause (iii) being less than 0.0 for a year, and may result in payment rates under the system under this subsection for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year.’’. (f) PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS.—Section 1886 of the Social Security Act, as amended by sections 3001, 3008, 3025, and 3133, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: ‘‘(s) PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT FOR PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS.— ‘‘(1) REFERENCE TO ESTABLISHMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SYSTEM.—For provisions related to the establishment and implementation of a prospective payment system for payments under this title for inpatient hospital services furnished by psychiatric hospitals (as described in clause (i) of subsection (d)(1)(B)) and psychiatric units (as described in the matter following clause (v) of such subsection), see section 124 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999. ‘‘(2) IMPLEMENTATION FOR RATE YEAR BEGINNING IN 2010 AND SUBSEQUENT RATE YEARS.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In implementing the system described in paragraph (1) for the rate year beginning in 2010 and any subsequent rate year, any update to a base rate for days during the rate year for a psychiatric hospital or unit, respectively, shall be reduced— ‘‘(i) for the rate year beginning in 2012 and each subsequent rate year, by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and ‘‘(ii) for each of the rate years beginning in 2010 through 2019, by the other adjustment described in paragraph (3). ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE.—The application of this paragraph may result in such update being less than 0.0 for a rate year, and may result in payment rates under the system described in paragraph (1) for a rate year being less than such payment rates for the preceding rate year. ‘‘(3) OTHER ADJUSTMENT.—øAs revised by section 10319(e) and section 1105(d) of HCERA¿ For purposes of paragraph (2)(A)(ii), the other adjustment described in this paragraph is— ‘‘(A) for each of the rate years beginning in 2010 and 2011, 0.25 percentage point; ‘‘(B) for each of the rate years beginning in 2012 and 2013, 0.1 percentage point; ‘‘(C) for the rate year beginning in 2014, 0.3 percentage point; ‘‘(D) for each of the rate years beginning in 2015 and 2016, 0.2 percentage point; and ‘‘(E) for each of the rate years beginning in 2017, 2018, and 2019, 0.75 percentage point. ‘‘(4) QUALITY REPORTING.—øAs added by section 10322(a)¿ ‘‘(A) REDUCTION IN UPDATE FOR FAILURE TO REPORT.— ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Under the system described in paragraph (1), for rate year 2014 and each subsequent rate year, in the case of a psychiatric hospital or psychiatric unit that does not submit data to the Secretary in accordance with subparagraph (C) with respect to such a rate year, any annual update to a standard Federal rate for discharges for the hospital during the rate year, and after application of paragraph (2), shall be reduced by 2 percentage points. ‘‘(ii) SPECIAL RULE.—The application of this subparagraph may result in such annual update being less than 0.0 for a rate year, and may result in payment rates under the system described in paragraph (1) for a rate year being less than such payment rates for the preceding rate year. ‘‘(B) NONCUMULATIVE APPLICATION.—Any reduction under subparagraph (A) shall apply only with respect to the rate year involved and the Secretary shall not take into account such reduction in computing the payment amount under the system described in paragraph (1) for a subsequent rate year. ‘‘(C) SUBMISSION OF QUALITY DATA.—For rate year 2014 and each subsequent rate year, each psychiatric hospital and psychiatric unit shall submit to the Secretary data on quality measures specified under subparagraph (D). Such data shall be submitted in a form and manner, and at a time, specified by the Secretary for purposes of this subparagraph. ‘‘(D) QUALITY MEASURES.— ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to clause (ii), any measure specified by the Secretary under this subparagraph must have been endorsed by the entity with a contract under section 1890(a). ‘‘(ii) EXCEPTION.—In the case of a specified area or medical topic determined appropriate by the Secretary for which a feasible and practical measure has not been endorsed by the entity with a contract under section 1890(a), the Secretary may specify a measure that is not so endorsed as long as due consideration is given to measures that have been endorsed or adopted by a consensus organization identified by the Secretary. ‘‘(iii) TIME FRAME.—Not later than October 1, 2012, the Secretary shall publish the measures selected under this subparagraph that will be applicable with respect to rate year 2014. ‘‘(E) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF DATA SUBMITTED.—The Secretary shall establish procedures for making data submitted under subparagraph (C) available to the public. Such procedures shall ensure that a psychiatric hospital and a psychiatric unit has the opportunity to review the data that is to be made public with respect to the hospital or unit prior to such data being made public. The Secretary shall report quality measures that relate to services furnished in inpatient settings in psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric units on the Internet website of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.’’. (g) HOSPICE CARE.—Section 1814(i)(1)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(i)(1)(C)), as amended by section 3132, is amended by adding at the end the following new clauses: øAs revised by section 10319(f)¿ ‘‘(iv) After determining the market basket percentage increase under clause (ii)(VII) or (iii), as applicable, with respect to fiscal year 2013 and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall reduce such percentage— ‘‘(I) for 2013 and each subsequent fiscal year, by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and ‘‘(II) subject to clause (v), for each of fiscal years 2013 through 2019, by 0.3 percentage point. The application of this clause may result in the market basket percentage increase under clause (ii)(VII) or (iii), as applicable, being less than 0.0 for a fiscal year, and may result in payment rates under this subsection for a fiscal year being less than such payment rates for the preceding fiscal year. ‘‘(v) Clause (iv)(II) shall be applied with respect to any of fiscal years 2014 through 2019 by substituting ‘0.0 percentage points’ for ‘0.3 percentage point’, if for such fiscal year— ‘‘(I) the excess (if any) of— ‘‘(aa) the total percentage of the non-elderly insured population for the preceding fiscal year (based on the most recent estimates available from the Director of the Congressional Budget Office before a vote in either House on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that, if determined in the affirmative, would clear such Act for enrollment); over ‘‘(bb) the total percentage of the non-elderly insured population for such preceding fiscal year (as estimated by the Secretary); exceeds ‘‘(II) 5 percentage points.’’. (h) DIALYSIS.—Section 1881(b)(14)(F) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395rr(b)(14)(F)) is amended— (1) in clause (i)— (A) by inserting ‘‘(I)’’ after ‘‘(F)(i)’’ (B) in subclause (I), as inserted by subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking ‘‘clause (ii)’’ and inserting ‘‘subclause (II) and clause (ii)’’; and (ii) by striking ‘‘minus 1.0 percentage point’’; and (C) by adding at the end the following new subclause: ‘‘(II) For 2012 and each subsequent year, after determining the increase factor described in subclause (I), the Secretary shall reduce such increase factor by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II). The application of the preceding sentence may result in such increase factor being less than 0.0 for a year, and may result in payment rates under the payment system under this paragraph for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year.’’; and (2) in clause (ii)(II)— (A) by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to clause (i)(II), the’’; and (B) by striking ‘‘clause (i) minus 1.0 percentage point’’ and inserting ‘‘clause (i)(I)’’. (i) OUTPATIENT HOSPITALS.—Section 1833(t)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(3)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (C)(iv), by inserting ‘‘and subparagraph (F) of this paragraph’’ after ‘‘(17)’’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: ‘‘(F) PRODUCTIVITY AND OTHER ADJUSTMENT.—After determining the OPD fee schedule increase factor under subparagraph (C)(iv), the Secretary shall reduce such increase factor— ‘‘(i) for 2012 and subsequent years, by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and ‘‘(ii) for each of 2010 through 2019, by the adjustment described in subparagraph (G). The application of this subparagraph may result in the increase factor under subparagraph (C)(iv) being less than 0.0 for a year, and may result in payment rates under the payment system under this subsection for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year. ‘‘(G) OTHER ADJUSTMENT.—øAs revised by section 10319(g) and section 1105(e) of HCERA¿ For purposes of subparagraph (F)(ii), the adjustment described in this subparagraph is— ‘‘(i) for each of 2010 and 2011, 0.25 percentage point; ‘‘(ii) for each of 2012 and 2013, 0.1 percentage point; ‘‘(iii) for 2014, 0.3 percentage point; ‘‘(iv) for each of 2015 and 2016, 0.2 percentage point; and ‘‘(v) for each of 2017, 2018, and 2019, 0.75 percentage point.’’. (j) AMBULANCE SERVICES.—Section 1834(l)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(l)(3)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; (2) in subparagraph (B)— (A) by inserting ‘‘, subject to subparagraph (C) and the succeeding sentence of this paragraph,’’ after ‘‘increased’’; and (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: ‘‘(C) for 2011 and each subsequent year, after determining the percentage increase under subparagraph (B) for the year, reduce such percentage increase by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II).’’; and (4) by adding at the end the following flush sentence: ‘‘The application of subparagraph (C) may result in the percentage increase under subparagraph (B) being less than 0.0 for a year, and may result in payment rates under the fee schedule under this subsection for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year.’’. (k) AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTER SERVICES.—Section 1833(i)(2)(D) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(i)(2)(D)) is amended— (1) by redesignating clause (v) as clause (vi); and (2) by inserting after clause (iv) the following new clause: ‘‘(v) In implementing the system described in clause (i) for 2011 and each subsequent year, any annual update under such system for the year, after application of clause (iv), shall be reduced by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II). The application of the preceding sentence may result in such update being less than 0.0 for a year, and may result in payment rates under the system described in clause (i) for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year.’’. (l) LABORATORY SERVICES.—Section 1833(h)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(h)(2)(A)) is amended— (1) in clause (i)— (A) by inserting ‘‘, subject to clause (iv),’’ after ‘‘year) by’’; and (B) by striking ‘‘through 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘and 2010’’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new clause: ‘‘(iv) After determining the adjustment to the fee schedules under clause (i), the Secretary shall reduce such adjustment— ‘‘(I) for 2011 and each subsequent year, by the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II); and ‘‘(II) for each of 2011 through 2015, by 1.75 percentage points. Subclause (I) shall not apply in a year where the adjustment to the fee schedules determined under clause (i) is 0.0 or a percentage decrease for a year. The application of the productivity adjustment under subclause (I) shall not result in an adjustment to the fee schedules under clause (i) being less than 0.0 for a year. The application of subclause (II) may result in an adjustment to the fee schedules under clause (i) being less than 0.0 for a year, and may result in payment rates for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year.’’. (m) CERTAIN DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT.—Section 1834(a)(14) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(14)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (K)— (A) by striking ‘‘2011, 2012, and 2013,’’; and (B) by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at the end; (2) by striking subparagraphs (L) and (M) and inserting the following new subparagraph: ‘‘(L) for 2011 and each subsequent year— ‘‘(i) the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (United States city average) for the 12-month period ending with June of the previous year, reduced by— ‘‘(ii) the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II).’’; and (3) by adding at the end the following flush sentence: ‘‘The application of subparagraph (L)(ii) may result in the covered item update under this paragraph being less than 0.0 for a year, and may result in payment rates under this subsection for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year.’’. (n) PROSTHETIC DEVICES, ORTHOTICS, AND PROSTHETICS.—Section 1834(h)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(h)(4)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A)— (A) in clause (ix), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; (B) in clause (x)— (i) by striking ‘‘a subsequent year’’ and inserting ‘‘for each of 2007 through 2010’’; and (ii) by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at the end; (C) by adding at the end the following new clause: ‘‘(xi) for 2011 and each subsequent year— ‘‘(I) the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (United States city average) for the 12-month period ending with June of the previous year, reduced by— ‘‘(II) the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II).’’; and (D) by adding at the end the following flush sentence: ‘‘The application of subparagraph (A)(xi)(II) may result in the applicable percentage increase under subparagraph (A) being less than 0.0 for a year, and may result in payment rates under this subsection for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year.’’. (o) OTHER ITEMS.—Section 1842(s)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395u(s)(1)) is amended— (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘Subject to’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) Subject to’’; (2) by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new subparagraph: ‘‘(B) Any fee schedule established under this paragraph for such item or service shall be updated— ‘‘(i) for years before 2011— ‘‘(I) subject to subclause (II), by the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (United States city average) for the 12-month period ending with June of the preceding year; and ‘‘(II) for items and services described in paragraph (2)(D) for 2009, section 1834(a)(14)(J) shall apply under this paragraph instead of the percentage increase otherwise applicable; and ‘‘(ii) for 2011 and subsequent years—‘‘(I) the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (United States city average) for the 12-month period ending with June of the previous year, reduced by— ‘‘(II) the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II).’’; and (3) by adding at the end the following flush sentence: ‘‘The application of subparagraph (B)(ii)(II) may result in the update under this paragraph being less than 0.0 for a year, and may result in payment rates under any fee schedule established under this paragraph for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year.’’. (p) NO APPLICATION PRIOR TO APRIL 1, 2010.—Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, the amendments made by subsections (a), (c), and (d) shall not apply to discharges occurring before April 1, 2010.

Browse ACA Titles

  • I-Quality, Affordable Health Care for all Americans
  • II-Role of Public Programs
  • III-Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Health Care
  • IV-Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving Public Health
  • V-Health Care Workforce
  • VI-Transparency and Program Integrity
  • VII-Improving Access to Innovative Medical Therapies
  • VIII-Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS ACT)
  • IX-Revenue Provisions

ABOUT

  • Home
  • About Policy Hub
  • Free Newsletter
  • Team
  • Mission and Values
  • Contact Us

Contact Us

Impact Health Policy Partners 1301 K Street, NW, Suite 300W
Washington, D.C. 20005

(202) 309-0796
Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 ‐ Impact Health Policy Partners ‐ All Rights Reserved ‐ Privacy Policy ‐ Terms and Conditions ‐ Log in